post305

India Insider: Affluence Among the Few, Aspirations for Many

by with No Comment AMT MarketsAssetsFeatured Highlights

India Insider: Affluence Among the Few, Aspirations for Many

A recent report by Franklin Templeton highlighted that India’s per capita income will penetrate the $5,000.00 USD level by 2031, pushing the country into what some analysts consider an affluence trigger zone. Their article celebrates the consumer boom showing the rising sales of premium detergents, growing green tea consumption, and a surge in discretionary spending, as if prosperity has finally crossed over into a mainstream phenomena.

But a closer look reveals something else and a worthwhile critique of Franklin Templeton’s optimistic portrayal.

Who Actually Spends this Money ?

The Franklin Templeton report confidently attributes the wealth effect to rising equities, real estate and gold. Yet, with only 13 crore (130 million) demat accounts in a country of 143 crore people, how can equities be driving broad affluence? Even within those attributed accounts, activity is heavily concentrated in the top decile of income earners like urban professionals in finance, IT and export linked sectors; and over 70% of mutual fund assets under management come from the top ten cities.

The so called upper middle class that fuels premium consumption largely works in these sectors. For the rest of India – especially the 42% still dependent on agriculture – wages have barely kept pace with inflation. Several national surveys and analyses show real wage stagnation since 2015-2016. Data from the Labor Bureau and the National Sample Survey (NSSO) indicates that real wages for rural laborers had near zero growth between 2015-2016 and 2022-2023. In contrast, the period before 2015-16 showed much faster wage growth.

post305
NSSO Survey data compiled by Idea India Magazine

The Concentration of Savings and Spending Power

The report itself concedes that the top 20% of households hold around 85% of India’s total savings. That’s roughly 26 crore people (260 million) driving most of the premium consumption, while the remaining 104 crore (1.04 billion) share only 15% of savings – a stark reminder that aggregate growth often hides skewed realities. And this is why rural households and lower-income urban families, meanwhile, are facing tighter budgets and are actually cutting back on discretionary spending.

Gold as a Survival Cushion

The report romanticizes gold as a symbol of wealth, but in rural India, the precious metal plays a very different role. Gold is not an indicator of luxury and status, but a financial safety net. In villages around Tiruvannamalai City of Tamil Nadu State. Where I have surveyed about 50 families, average holdings are often below 40 grams. When harvests fail or cash flows tighten, this gold is pledged or sold to fund essentials like health expenses, education or seeds for the next planting season.

Yes, some towns in India have higher gold holdings and savings, sharply due to offshore remittances especially in States like Kerala and Gujarat. This remittance led prosperity fuels local real estate and pushes up rents, but it’s a localized story, not a national one. Most rural communities still depend on seasonal income and informal borrowing.

The Uneven Reality Behind Growth

Premium brands are growing faster, but this signals income polarization, not inclusive growth. The per capita income maybe rising, but it’s an average skewed by the top 10-20% who hold multiple assets. For most, consumption is fueled by rising debt. Until wage growth broadens and rural incomes strengthen, India’s  consumption boom will remain the affluence of a few – not the prosperity of the many.

post294

India Insider: U.S Credit Crunch vs. Indian Banking Paralysis

by with No Comment Featured HighlightsFinancial InstitutionsIndia

India Insider: U.S Credit Crunch vs. Indian Banking Paralysis

When the U.S suffered a severe credit crunch in the early 1990s, the triggers were clear: the collapse of the leveraged buyout (LBO) boom, commercial real estate price corrections, and the failure of Savings and Loans (S&L) Associations, created the need for a $160 billion taxpayer bailout. Regulators, determined to act tough, declared many banks undercapitalized. The result was a nationwide squeeze from 1991 to 1993, where capital shortages – not liquidity, froze credit markets.

post294
Reserve Bank of India Borrowing Rates 1935 to 2025

Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan slashed the Federal Funds rate to 3%, but banks couldn’t lend without capital. The unique twist was that, even as lending slowed, competition among borrowers pushed prime lending rates to 6%. This gave banks a fat 3–4% spread. Greenspan let this persist for nearly three years, enabling banks to earn profits equal to more than 10% of assets. With capital requirements at 8%, the windfall repaired balance sheets. By 1994, the U.S had exited the crisis and returned to strong growth.

India’s trajectory was very different. For decades, the country ran structurally high interest rates, which in theory should have allowed banks to recapitalize through spreads, just like the U.S. However, the reality was distorted by governance failures. Public sector banks (PSBs) , which dominate the system did not use their spreads to strengthen capital. Instead, politically connected lending to oligarchs and large industrial houses left the banks saddled with non-performing assets (NPAs).

I witnessed the aftermath up close in 2019 while working at Edelweiss Brokerage. Shadow banks were stressed, some private banks were crumbling, and PSBs were finally forced to acknowledge their bad loans. The selloff in the banking stocks were brutal that year, Catholic Syrian Bank’s IPO, one of the prominent South Indian banks went undersubscribed. To counter the slowdown, the government slashed corporate taxes from 30% to 22% to stimulate capital expenditure.

Unlike the U.S, India’s stress was on the asset side. Corporates were dragged into Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) proceedings, where assets were monetized through painful restructurings. Piramal Finance bought DHFL at 30 cents on the dollar, and ArcelorMittal acquired Essar Steel at 90 cents. This was the hard clean up the system had avoided for years.

The NDA (National Democratic Alliance) government made the right call in restructuring the banking sector. Weak public sector banks were merged with stronger ones. Yes, it was costly. Households bore the burden via higher taxes, hidden charges, and high borrowing rates. But at least the problem was confronted.

The contrast is striking. The U.S endured a sharp three-year crunch, recapitalized its banks through spreads and market discipline, and bounced back quickly. India endured nearly a decade of paralysis, requiring taxpayer recapitalizations, corporate asset fire-sales, and systemic restructuring. The eventual stability allowed private sector banks to quietly capture market share from their weaker state-owned peers.

The lesson is simple: interest rate spreads can heal banks only if governance is strong. Without accountability, as India’s PSB saga shows, high rates merely tax households and businesses without fixing the system.