postN105.1

India Insider: Agriculture Still Traps Nation’s Workforce

India Insider: Agriculture Still Traps Nation's Workforce

A Field Survey in South India’s Agricultural Towns

India’s growth story is usually told through noteworthy headline numbers. Yet beneath these aggregates lies a persistent imbalance, agriculture continues to employ a large share of the workforce, while contributing a much smaller share of output. This gap shapes income stability, consumption patterns, and the complicated experience of growth across much of the country for many people.

This essay uses field observations comparing two major agricultural towns in Tamil Nadu State in India, Tiruvannamalai and Kallakurichi. After analyzing their respective data and examining how this imbalance plays out on the ground, I offer my perspective.

Typical Agricultural Field in Southern India

Tiruvannamalai: Growth Without Employment Transformation

In Tiruvannamalai district, I visited several areas where housing conditions were poor and informal settlements were widespread. I have visited many households here since 2023. These conditions are now changing, but not in a way that fundamentally transforms employment.

Capital inflows from the neighboring State of Andhra Pradesh have fueled a real estate boom and expanded services such as lodging, restaurants, and transport. While this has altered the physical landscape and raised asset values, it has not created stable non-farm jobs at scale. Employment remains largely informal, seasonal, and low-paid, leaving the underlying agricultural labor trap intact.

Although Tiruvannamalai exhibits a relatively high services share in district GDP, the income generated by this sector accrues from a narrow group of asset owners, intermediaries, and rent-seekers. As a result, per capita income figures overstate the extent of broad-based welfare. A large share of the workforce remains engaged in low-wage service activities with limited income security.

Kallakurichi: Agricultural Dependence, Weaker Services

In Kallakurichi district, the structural imbalance is even more pronounced. Agriculture accounts for a noticeably larger share of district GDP than in Tiruvannamalai, while the services share is correspondingly lower. District level GDDP and sectoral composition data from the Department of Economics and Statistics, Government of Tamil Nadu (2022–23 provisional, current prices), show that agriculture contributes roughly one-fifth of district output, even as a disproportionately large share of the workforce continues to depend on this type of work for income.

This high dependence on agriculture results in extremely low output per worker, widespread disguised unemployment, and chronically weak incomes. Growth exists, but it is concentrated in activities that do not absorb labor effectively.

Gross Domestic District Product Comparison of Agriculture versus Non-Agriculture

Core Problem: Growth Composition, Not Growth Absence

The core structural problem in districts like Tiruvannamalai and Kallakurichi is therefore not the absence of growth, but its composition. Too many workers remain tied to a sector that generates relatively little value. Services and industry have expanded, but not in a manner that absorbs surplus rural labor at scale.

As long as labor remains trapped in low productivity farming, while non-farm sectors fail to provide stable employment opportunities, headline income measures will continue to overstate actual welfare.

Consumption Consequences of Agricultural Dependence

This imbalance has direct consequences for consumption. Towns that depend heavily on agriculture tend to exhibit weak and uneven consumption patterns. Farm incomes are inherently volatile, driven by fluctuations in commodity prices, weather conditions, and market access. In many cases, farmers are forced to sell produce at a discount, incur outright losses, or delay sales under distressing conditions. Only intermittently do they realize meaningful profits.

Chart Comparing Towns of Tiruvannamalai and Kallakurichi in Tamil Nadu

This volatility translates into cautious spending behavior. Consumption rises in short bursts following a good season, but thereafter contracts sharply. This pattern is clearly visible in districts such as Tiruvannamalai and Kallakurichi, where agricultural dependence suppresses steady consumption despite occasional income windfalls.

The same dynamic is visible at State level. Across Tamil Nadu, agriculture employs over 40 percent of the labor force, while contributing a far smaller share of output. The statistics exhibited at the district level are therefore not an isolated phenomenon, but a systemic one.

National Structural Imbalance

Zooming out further, what is visible in Tiruvannamalai and Kallakurichi mirrors India’s broader structural imbalance. Nationally, agriculture employs close to half the workforce, but contributes less than a fifth of GDP. This gap suppresses incomes, weakens consumption, and reflects India’s limited success in industrializing at scale.

India Agriculture as Percent of GDP from 1990s into 2020s

Services have grown rapidly, but they remain reliant on capital and skill intensive, and unable to absorb surplus rural labor in large numbers. As a result, economic growth continues without broad based prosperity. Headline GDP numbers improve, but the underlying structure remains fragile.

India’s central economic scrouge is growth without labor mobility. Until workers move out of low productivity agriculture jobs and into stable non-farm employment at scale, income volatility and weak consumption will remain defining features of the economy. Regardless of how strong the headline growth numbers appear, a national challenge remains.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

postN74

India Insider: Growth Without Development an Inequality Trap

India Insider: Growth Without Development an Inequality Trap

An India and Latin America Comparison

India’s strong headline growth reflects a rapid expansion of aggregate output. Yet this growth often coexists with weak job creation, uneven human capital formation, and persistent inequality. This coexistence is not a temporary anomaly. It reflects a deeper political & economic structure in which inequality itself constrains development, rather than merely emerging as a byproduct of slow growth.

This mechanism is similar to Latin America. In unequal political economies, rising income concentration encourages elites to exit from public systems like education, healthcare, transport, and social insurance. Once affluent groups no longer depend on public provision, political incentives to strengthen these systems weaken fiscal capacity erodes, public services deteriorate, and inequality becomes self-reinforcing.

Latin America’s experience illustrates this dynamic clearly. Despite periods of high growth driven by industrialization, commodity booms, or financial liberalization, many countries failed to build universal public systems. Elites relied on private schools, private healthcare, and offshore financial arrangements, while the majority depended on chronically underfunded public institutions. The result was a narrow tax base, weak state capacity, and growth that was volatile and socially shallow.

Figure concept adapted from book, “The cost of Inequality in Latin America” by Diego Sanchez-Ancochea

India increasingly shows signs of a similar trajectory. Public spending on health remains around 1.2 – 1.4 percent of GDP. Government expenditures on education is around 3 percent of GDP, which is low not just by OECD standards, but comparative to many middle income Latin American economies. Out of pocket healthcare costs account for roughly 45 – 50 percent of total health spending in India, among the highest shares globally. These figures point to a systematic private substitution over public provisions, a hallmark of elite exit.

Implications of Elite Leaving Public Systems

Withdrawal from public systems has direct implications for growth quality. When education and healthcare remain uneven, the diffusion of skills and productivity across the workforce is limited. Growth then concentrates in capital intensive or skill intensive enclaves, while large segments of the labor force remain trapped in low productivity informal employment. India’s employment elasticity of growth has remained structurally low, estimated at below 0.2 in recent decades, meaning that even high output growth generates relatively few jobs.

This structural weakness is reinforced by the nature of Indian capitalism. Like much of Latin America, India’s growth model rewards scale, access, and regulatory navigation more than technological risk taking. Firms that can manage land acquisition, compliance complexity, market concentration, and political connections earn higher returns than those that invest in frontier innovation. Private investment in research and development remains modest: total R&D spending in India is around 0.6 – 0.7 percent of GDP, with a particularly weak contribution from the private sector. By contrast, East Asian economies that achieved solid employment growth invested 2.0 – 4.0 percent of GDP in R&D during their catch up phases.

This outcome produces poor job growth and entrenched dual labor markets, which is also another Latin American hallmark. A relatively small formal sector benefits from capital strengthening and productivity gains, but the majority of workers remain in informal employment with stagnant wages and weak social protection. Gradually this weakens domestic demand and increases reliance on credit, exports, or asset inflation to sustain growth. Latin America’s history also shows that such growth patterns are inherently fragile.

India Vulnerability and Structural Risks

Narrow tax bases limit counter-cyclical policies. High inequality constrains mass consumption. Credit expansion often substitutes for income growth, increasing financial vulnerability. India has thus far avoided repeated balance of payments or sovereign debt crises, but the underlying structural risks look similar to Latin America. Growth looks strong on paper, yet remains vulnerable to shocks and has been slow to translate into broad based societal gains.

India differs from economies that have escaped their inequality traps, like East Asia and Northern Europe, because of poor development sequencing. These successful regional giants expanded universal public education, healthcare, and social insurance early, before inequality became politically entrenched. Elite dependence on public systems sustained fiscal capacity and productivity diffusion, allowing growth to create gainful employment.

India’s Social and Economic Dualism

India’s economic liberalization grew before consolidating universal public provisions. As growth has accelerated, inequality has widened and the exit of elites has deepened from public centers. An opportunity to create inclusive institutions during this early growth phase is missing for parts of the society.

The implication is clear. High growth alone does not guarantee development. When inequality weakens public systems and limits fiscal capacity, this discourages technological risk taking and produces inadequate job growth. Output expansion becomes narrow and periodically fragile. Latin America’s experience is a warning. Without building strong public institutions and reshaping incentives toward broad based innovation, India risks portraying impressive headline growth while vast disparity persists.

postN72

U.S National Security: USD Reserve Currency Importance

U.S National Security: USD Reserve Currency Importance

Opinion: The following article is commentary and its views are solely those of the author. This article was first published the 23rd of December via The Angry Demagogue.

We would like to start going through the U.S administration’s National Security Strategy released last month. There is a lot in there – much of it the same as in past administrations and much of it different. The tone of course is full Trump and while the introductory parts try to make it into a revolutionary document it does in fact build upon much of what has been American foreign policy for decades. One thing it most certainly gets right is that American foreign policy since the end of the Cold War has not found its compass. From a unitary world to one dependent upon global organizations, from a sharing of goals with western Europe to a pivot to Asia, from the war on terror and the middle east to Russia-Ukraine, the United States has struggled to find its way in the post-Cold War world.

We however will concentrate today on one aspect of the strategy, the third bullet in part III – “What Are America’s Available Means to Get What We Want?”. The third bullet point speaks of America having “The world’s leading financial system and capital markets, including the Dollar’s global reserve currency status” – a point that no one with any knowledge of global capital markets can not accept. The end of the bullet point – the Dollar’s global reserve currency status – is the most important because it underscores America’s leadership and essentially allows the United States of America to finance its military and its welfare state. The U.S Dollar as the “reserve currency” means that nearly all the world’s goods are quoted and therefore sold in Dollars.

Why is that important to the United States? Because the U.S government depends on its ability to issue Treasury bonds and bills at will – something no other government can do. It can do this because for another country to buy oil or copper or titanium or corn or soybeans from a country that is not their own– they need access to Dollars. Saudi Arabia and the other gulf states quote the price of oil in U.S Dollars and demand payment in U.S Dollars. The Saudis can deposit those Dollars in American banks or in what is called Eurodollar deposits in foreign banks (there are some 13 trillion Dollars in Eurodollar accounts globally). The Eurodollar accounts are essentially promises by the bank to give U.S Dollars to the holder when he makes a withdrawal. This strengthens the U.S capital markets and allows investors to have better and more investment choices. It is not only America’s often superior companies that bring profits to 401k’s and pension funds but the liquidity and vastness of America’s capital markets that can list domestic and foreign corporations. The reserve currency leading to the advanced capital markets allows the world – and America – to do this.

The U.S Treasury market is so liquid because every country needs Dollars in order to trade. They need to have enough dollar reserves since no one actually wants their own currency. In Israel, for example, local gas companies cannot buy oil with Israeli Shekels, since what will Azerbaijan, for example, do with them? There are only so many products that Israel can sell them. They need Dollars so that they are free to buy other commodities or other products.

The U.S Dollar as a reserve currency also is a break on inflation since the price of oil and other commodities is always in U.S Dollars. A weak or strong U.S Dollar influences the inflation rate in non-USD countries. A weak Israeli Shekel, South African Rand or Chinese Yuan does not influence the price of gasoline in the United States.

In short – as the Trump Administration understands well, the dollar as a reserve currency is a luxury the U.S cannot give up. The lack of the USD as a reserve currency could cause the Dollar to collapse and along with it the price of U.S Treasuries. As UST prices drop, their yields will rise and the cost of financing the U.S government will make interest payments on debt to rise well beyond its already absurd figure of over 4% of GDP – while debt itself is 120% of GDP. The U.S government currently pays over $1 trillion in debt service (interest payments on its bonds and bills). By contrast, the U.S defense budget for 2024 was $836 billion (about 3.3% of GDP).

We need to ask ourselves what can challenge the USD as the reserve currency and what could happen that would encourage the world to change? While the E.U had dreams of making the Euro an alternative reserve currency, the lack of growth in the E.U’s economy and population have put that dream to rest. The only other country that could theoretically replace the United States as the global economic go to country could be China. While in the long run, China’s lack of openness would probably mean that the Yuan would not last long as the reserve currency, that does not mean that they couldn’t jolt the global economy just enough to force it to use the Yuan to buy oil and other commodities.

China is already cornering the market on rare earth minerals and it making inroads in Africa where it mines all sorts of commodities from gold to copper to platinum and so many others (Africa has about 30% of global mineral reserves). That in itself is not enough to rock the global markets and cause a change in how the world does business.

Oil though, is that one thing that could allow China to challenge the USD as the reserve currency, even if it just presents the Yuan as an alternative.

How could that happen?

A Chinese takeover of Taiwan, by whatever means it uses would give the Chinese Communist Party control not only of the South China Sea but also allow its noisier and inferior (to America’s) submarine fleet to enter the Pacific and patrol it freely. The Chinese Navy, with a base on the “other” side of Taiwan would give it control of the north-south sea lanes that Japan and South Korea are dependent upon. Essentially, Chinese control of Taiwan would put Japan, South Korea, Vietnam and the Philippines at the mercy of the Chinese Navy. China could blockade these countries but that would be an act of war and then involve the navies of those countries and possibly the United States. It would affect the global economy negatively but it would not cause a change in world’s reserve currency. But, what if China works out a deal with Saudi Arabia to quote and sell their oil in Yuan (or the Chinese Petro-Yuan it wants to create) and then tells these countries, especially industrial powerhouses and energy poor Japan and South Korea that it will allow the passage of oil as long as they purchase the oil in Yuan?

Russia is already trying to get India to pay it for its oil in Yuan, to some success. Adding economies the size of Japan and South Korea would mean that any country that wants to buy oil could buy it in Yuan instead of Dollars. Once in Yuan, these countries would need to use the Yuan to buy Chinese products, deposit cash there and buy Chinese treasury bills. If China were to combine that with demands that all chips made in Taiwan also be sold in Yuan, the U.S Dollar would suddenly and forcefully no longer be the only reserve currency in the world.

Obviously, the way to stop this from happening is by stating outright that the United States will not tolerate a Chinese takeover of Taiwan. It is true, that the Strategy claims that the US “will also maintain our longstanding declaratory policy on Taiwan, meaning that the United States does not support any unilateral change to the status quo in the Taiwan Strait” but in practice the administration has criticized Japan’s tough talk on China instead of leaving it be. A strong silence on Prime Minister Takaichi’s remarks on China would have served the purpose of keeping the status quo more than telling her to tone down her rhetoric. There is a strong “no intervention ever” strain in the country and the President must make the case that that is not an option if the United States wants to maintain its leadership position, way of life and general prosperity.

In short, the threat to the Dollar as the reserve currency heads right through Taiwan. For those who think that the investment the U.S makes in keeping the Dollar where it is, is too expensive, just think of going on vacation and having the change to Yuan before you leave the country, wondering how much to change because of currency fluctuation and how much fun it is to return with hundreds of dollars in banknotes that you can’t use. Imagine your credit card bill on such travels and wondering how you went 15% over budget but didn’t get anything extra for it. Now imagine the national economy working that way.

Disclaimer: the views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of the author, and not necessarily the opinions reflected by angrymetatraders.com or its associated parties.

You can follow Ira Slomowitz via The Angry Demagogue on Substack https://iraslomowitz.substack.com/ 

postN71

India Insider: The 8.2% Growth Mirage Needs a Reality Check

India Insider: The 8.2% Growth Mirage Needs a Reality Check

India is celebrating the 8.2% real GDP growth result for Q2 FY26, as if it has entered a new economic orbit. Politicians are claiming victory and media is packaging optimism. The narrative is simple: India cannot be stopped. But once we move beyond the headline, the number loses credibility. It rests on a broken deflator, a statistical gap that no one can trace, and data architecture that doesn’t consider half the economy. This is not a story of unstoppable growth. This is a story of statistical convenience.

The Production–Expenditure Divide

On the production side, the numbers look heroic. Manufacturing allegedly grew 9.1%, and financial and professional services posted more than 10% growth. Corporate India looks like it is flying. But when the same activity is measured from the expenditure side – who actually spends this income – the story weakens.

Private consumption at 7.9% is respectable, not outstanding. The real shock is government consumption, which contracted by 2.7%. A shrinking government should normally mute growth, not accelerate it. Yet the GDP shoots up. How does that make sense? It doesn’t unless the number is being propped up somewhere else – and this is the case.

₹1.63 Lakh Crore of ‘Unknown Growth’

GDP includes a category called ‘discrepancy’. It exists because the two methods – production and expenditure – never perfectly align. The discrepancy stands at ₹1.63 lakh crore ($18.2 Billion USD) which equates into roughly 3.3% of real GDP. That means a chunk of this 8.2% growth has no identifiable spender: No households. No firms. No government.

It is income without absorption. A statistical plug. When a number this large is called ‘discrepancy’, the headline becomes unreliable – suspicious. You cannot claim world beating growth when your own data admits it cannot explain where that growth came from.

Chart via the National Statistical Office

The Deflator Illusion

The next distortion is the nominal vs real GDP gap. Nominal GDP is growing at 8.7% and real GDP at 8.2%. A gap of 0.5 percentage points implies inflation has almost vanished. Every Indian knows this is not true. Costs did not collapse. Food inflation has not disappeared.

The explanation is mechanical: India still uses the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) to deflate nominal output. Global commodity prices fell, WPI softened sharply, and that flattening pushed up the real number. In other words, GDP grew because the denominator fell, not because production surged.

This creates a fiscal problem. The Union Budget assumed 10.1% nominal growth. At 8.7%, tax buoyancy will weaken, deficit targets become more difficult, and next year’s fiscal capability shrinks. Real GDP does not pay the bills, Nominal GDP does.

The Informal Blind Spot

India still cannot measure its informal economy accurately. Nearly half of GDP and employment sits outside the formal system, yet the NSO uses formal sector proxies such as corporate balance sheets, GST data, and financial flows to estimate the rest of the economy. If a small business collapses and a corporate giant expands, the data shows a net gain, erasing distress at the bottom which means real economic circumstances are not portrayed accurately for Indian citizens.

Agriculture grew at 3.5%, but it still supports 46% of India’s workforce. That means growth is concentrated in capital intensive and balance-sheet heavy sectors, not into areas that put cash into rural hands. A booming Nifty Index via the stock market does not translate into household prosperity.

An Economy Measured with Old Tools

India continues to measure GDP using a 2011–12 base year, an era before UPI (Unified Payments Interface), before fintech credit, before e-commerce, before gig workforces, before the pandemic rewired supply chains and consumption patterns. India is living in a digital economy, but measuring activity with analog instruments.

A shift to a 2022–23 base year, plus replacing WPI with a Producer Price Index, may finally align the numbers realistically. But until then, headlines are running ahead of bona-fide measurements.

India’s 8.2% print is impressive, but growth estimates that don’t reflect grounded realities produce illusionary optics rather than useful insights. For India to strengthen fiscal and economic credibility, measurements must capture households, labor markets, and productivity, not solely corporate outputs. Policy cannot be shaped by statistical ambiguity, it requires transparency and trusted data.

post315

India Insider: Why a Deep Corporate Bond Market is Needed

India Insider: Why a Deep Corporate Bond Market is Needed

India’s corporate bond market remains small relative to the size and ambitions of its economy. This is often described as a regulatory shortcoming. In reality, it reflects a deeper structural choice: India’s financial system was built to channel savings through banks, not markets. That choice now imposes visible constraints on capital formation, governance, and risk pricing.

During the Covid-19 pandemic, several Indian companies including firms such as Arvind Fashions were forced to raise capital by diluting their equity in public markets. Equity issuance is not inherently wrong, especially during a crisis. However, businesses built on consumer brands, distribution networks, and long gestation cycles require patient, long term capital. Financing such models primarily through short term bank loans or repeated equity dilution creates a mismatch between the nature of the business and the nature of the capital supporting it.

India Corporate Bond Comparison to the U.S 2024-25 Approximated Totals

In countries like the U.S, this gap is filled by intermediate forms of capital. Private equity firms often provide long duration funding through instruments such as mezzanine debt, while deep corporate bond markets allow companies to raise long term money aligned with their operating horizons. In India, the absence of such markets make corporate choose to either raise capital via short term debt that strains cash flows or equity dilution at unfavorable points in the cycle.

A corporate bond market also serves a broader purpose: governance and accountability. A Parliamentary Standing Committee report in 2022 noted that nearly ₹10 lakh crore ($110 Billion USD) of corporate bank loans were written off over the preceding five years. While write-offs do not automatically imply wrongdoing, they highlight a system in which credit losses are repeatedly absorbed by public sector balance sheets where the capital is often infused by taxpayers money. In bank dominated systems, credit assessment is periodic and opaque. Market discipline remains weak.

Traded securities impose a different standard. Michael Milken once observed that bond markets re-evaluate credit daily, not every six months. Prices respond immediately to new information. If sellers suddenly outnumber buyers, the market forces a reassessment of risk in real time. In effect, every trading day becomes a fresh credit decision.

This discipline is missing when loans remain locked within banks. A vibrant corporate bond market which is supported by securitization, secondary-market liquidity, and institutional investors would allow credit risk to be priced, transferred, and monitored continuously. It would expose stress early, rather than after losses have already been socialized.

Today, banks account for nearly 70 percent of financial intermediation in India. Fintech has begun to challenge this dominance, but largely in consumer and personal finance. For corporate and MSME (Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises) financing, long-term capital cannot come from apps or short duration loans, it must come from markets designed to price risk over time.

India’s corporate bond market will not look like America’s, nor does it need to. But without deeper liquidity, institutional participation, and price discovery, India will continue to build long term businesses on short-term money ,and bear the consequences when cycles turn.

(Notes: 1 USD = 90.58)

post305

India Insider: Affluence Among the Few, Aspirations for Many

India Insider: Affluence Among the Few, Aspirations for Many

A recent report by Franklin Templeton highlighted that India’s per capita income will penetrate the $5,000.00 USD level by 2031, pushing the country into what some analysts consider an affluence trigger zone. Their article celebrates the consumer boom showing the rising sales of premium detergents, growing green tea consumption, and a surge in discretionary spending, as if prosperity has finally crossed over into a mainstream phenomena.

But a closer look reveals something else and a worthwhile critique of Franklin Templeton’s optimistic portrayal.

Who Actually Spends this Money ?

The Franklin Templeton report confidently attributes the wealth effect to rising equities, real estate and gold. Yet, with only 13 crore (130 million) demat accounts in a country of 143 crore people, how can equities be driving broad affluence? Even within those attributed accounts, activity is heavily concentrated in the top decile of income earners like urban professionals in finance, IT and export linked sectors; and over 70% of mutual fund assets under management come from the top ten cities.

The so called upper middle class that fuels premium consumption largely works in these sectors. For the rest of India – especially the 42% still dependent on agriculture – wages have barely kept pace with inflation. Several national surveys and analyses show real wage stagnation since 2015-2016. Data from the Labor Bureau and the National Sample Survey (NSSO) indicates that real wages for rural laborers had near zero growth between 2015-2016 and 2022-2023. In contrast, the period before 2015-16 showed much faster wage growth.

NSSO Survey data compiled by Idea India Magazine

The Concentration of Savings and Spending Power

The report itself concedes that the top 20% of households hold around 85% of India’s total savings. That’s roughly 26 crore people (260 million) driving most of the premium consumption, while the remaining 104 crore (1.04 billion) share only 15% of savings – a stark reminder that aggregate growth often hides skewed realities. And this is why rural households and lower-income urban families, meanwhile, are facing tighter budgets and are actually cutting back on discretionary spending.

Gold as a Survival Cushion

The report romanticizes gold as a symbol of wealth, but in rural India, the precious metal plays a very different role. Gold is not an indicator of luxury and status, but a financial safety net. In villages around Tiruvannamalai City of Tamil Nadu State. Where I have surveyed about 50 families, average holdings are often below 40 grams. When harvests fail or cash flows tighten, this gold is pledged or sold to fund essentials like health expenses, education or seeds for the next planting season.

Yes, some towns in India have higher gold holdings and savings, sharply due to offshore remittances especially in States like Kerala and Gujarat. This remittance led prosperity fuels local real estate and pushes up rents, but it’s a localized story, not a national one. Most rural communities still depend on seasonal income and informal borrowing.

The Uneven Reality Behind Growth

Premium brands are growing faster, but this signals income polarization, not inclusive growth. The per capita income maybe rising, but it’s an average skewed by the top 10-20% who hold multiple assets. For most, consumption is fueled by rising debt. Until wage growth broadens and rural incomes strengthen, India’s  consumption boom will remain the affluence of a few – not the prosperity of the many.

post303

India and the U.S Govt Shutdown: Quick Market Thoughts

India and the U.S Govt Shutdown: Quick Market Thoughts

President Trump has been ramping up his claims that India is no longer going to buy Russian oil, he made a statement regarding this belief yesterday once again. As the White House threatened to initiate tougher sanctions against India, there seems to have been some movement towards a reconciliation between the two powerful nations.

The Trump administration is clearly trying to limit the amount of purchases of Russian oil by India to increase economic pressures on Russia, and reportedly India may be starting to actually buy less oil. India has certainly not stopped buying Russian oil in a maximum ‘fait accompli’, but if the nation continues to show a willingness to purchase less energy resources from Russia, this will go a long way in preserving a good U.S and India association. A stronger relationship between the U.S and India can achieve a vital economic and military correlation for the both nations. Improved friendlier tones from New Delhi and Washington D.C appear to have reassured investors in the Indian equity markets via highs currently being seen on Nifty 50, which are now within sight of apex values from late September last year.

Nifty 50 One Year Chart as of 23rd October 2025

India is a vital and important part of U.S policy as it attempts to also create pressure on China too. By maintaining political and business dealings with India, the U.S can and should look upon this joint relationship as a vast long-term strategic interest. India understands this as well. The ability of India and the U.S to remain ‘friendly’ allies, and the prospect of creating a vigorous economic and military partnership should be one of the U.S government’s essential missions.

India does have strong connections to Russia the past handful of decades politically and economically via its non-aligned status. India will certainly maintain its dialogue and sometimes cooperative dealings with Russia. However, if India and the U.S maintain a solid relationship with the prospect of increasing their economic and political ties this could substantially change dynamics on the Asian continent.

U.S Government Shutdown Since the 1st of October

The U.S government has now been shutdown for over three weeks as Republicans and Democrats remain stubborn about compromise. Both sides have made the shutdown a political game. While each party claims they are doing what is best for the nation and preach to their collective voting bases, the stalemate could start to have uglier effects regarding wages not paid for many U.S employees on the 1st of November.

Dow Jones 30 One Year Chart as of 23rd October 2025

A lack of government salaries not being dispersed will cause an economic hit via consumer spending and create at a minimum some temporary damage for GDP numbers. Remarkably, and to be clear about this potential impact, Wall Street hasn’t seemed to care yet, but this could start to change. As the U.S economy rumbles powerfully forward without a major downturn in the major equity indices, politicians appear to be comfortable acting like spoiled children on both sides of the aisles engaged in accusing the other side of misdeeds.

Likely to start changing attitudes among Republicans and Democrats in the next two weeks are the coming Federal Reserve’s FOMC Statement during the end of October, and voting results via key political races in the first week of November.

Wall Street wants clarity regarding interest rate outlooks for November, December and early next year. Investors might not get a clear picture from the Fed next week, taking into consideration the Federal Reserve will not have up to date official U.S economic data because of the government shutdown. Meaning the Fed will likely issue a 25 basis point rate cut on the 29th of October and say it is uncertain about the coming few months because it does not have enough inflation, employment and GDP information to form a concrete opinion. The joke of coarse being the Fed seldom seems to have a strong opinion, but now can use the government shutdown as an excuse.

And now for contemplation, let’s look at the election in NYC for Mayor. A bona fide socialist may get elected in New York City who carries the historically misguided and dangerous wisdom of a Marxist. The economic and social practices of Marxism have proven utter failures for over one hundred years consistently. If NYC suffers a victory from the socialist candidate running as a Democrat, Wall Street and many financial institutions based in the city will not react favorably.

In the meantime, U.S equity indices remain elevated, cautious and within sight of record highs. The Nasdaq, Dow Jones and S&P along with other financial assets are producing choppy dangerous conditions for day traders who are attempting to wager on daily changes and suffering from the cautious behavioral sentiment being generated. Investors who look towards the mid and long-term are likely more comfortable, but are certainly keeping an eye on what is going to transpire over the next two weeks. Gold and Silver have come off their speculative highs. Forex continues to create volatile conditions as financial institutions appear unready to make bold predictions about what the Federal Reserve will do into January 2026.
post300

Gold: Not a Love Note but Recognition of Long-Term Importance

Gold: Not a Love Note but Recognition of Long-Term Importance

The U.S is now starting its second week of the government shutdown. Gold is near $4,190.00 as of this writing, which may be looked on as sign by some that some investors have bought into the precious metal because of a lack of faith in certain things. ‘Certain things’ being written in a way that points out the rather complex mix of perceptions that could quantify into all moving parts causing the bull run.

Gold Six Month Chart as of 15th October 2025

If you are a regular reader you will probably have figured out that I do not believe Gold is traversing higher because of a mere government shutdown. The precious metal has seen an upwards trend develop in earnest since the middle of October 2022 when it was trading around $1,640.00. Behavioral sentiment is important within Gold, and this has been the case for almost 6,000 years according to archeologists and historians.

In August 2011 Gold was near $1,900.00. In December of 2015 the precious metal was back to almost $1,000.00. This is written to show that in a little more than a four year period Gold lost nearly half its value in the relatively recent past.

This doesn’t mean I am writing to warn Gold is going to lose half its value suddenly and will be testing $2,000.00 in four years time. It points out that even though the precious metal is considered a hedge against inflation, that speculative elements are fantastically strong when large players buy and sell in unison and can cause periods in which Gold becomes overvalued and then experiences downturns.

Gold Five Year Chart as of 15th October 2025

We have seen this bullish show in Gold before. Milestone numbers are significant in the minds of the public, which often causes the thinking that they should have bought some gold in the past when it was cheaper. But interestingly enough for Gold is that it is almost always considered expensive by the general public. The value of fiat currency is highly correlated to the value of Gold in an unflattering way. While this is an obvious statement for many, it is important to note that we are all looking at the value of Gold while using hindsight.

Yes, I can hear influencers singing in unison in the background ‘do not forget about Bitcoin’, but I ask permission to do so. Hindsight is not always comfortable and I have been proven wrong about the digital currency frequently. However, I still remain somewhat optimistic that my bet on Gold is a better wager compared to Bitcoin regarding value in the future. And by future I mean for all-time. There is not enough foresight to know what Gold will be valued in one thousand years compared to Bitcoin. Yet, I remain much more confident about Gold being around than BTC in a millennium.

People can speak about a debasement of fiat currencies, including the USD. Like it or not the USD remains the dominant go to currency of global enterprise and this is unlikely to change over the next decade. The USD and other currencies are plagued by a constant loss of overall value due to inflation caused by a myriad of reasons. Rising prices in goods are unlikely to suddenly disappear, the costs of commerce and consumer products may start to gradually slow periodically, but the price of things seldom grows cheaper over the long-term.

Yes, the case can be made that by owning Gold it does not serve the economy well, because it is not an asset that is easily spent, but that is an argument for Adam Smith, John Maynard Keynes and Milton Friedman to enjoy in heaven. In the meantime down here on Earth, Gold can be speculated upon, bought and sold, and treated as a precious metal that will likely always be valued highly.

Gold Chart Prices since 1925

This is not a love note for Gold, it is meant as a way to say the precious metal is fairly priced considering the state of the world. $4,000.00 per an ounce of Gold could certainly turn into $5,000.00 in the not so distant future – like six months or one year depending on zeal. Speculative elements certainly aim for targets that psychologically please aspirations.

Day traders as always are faced with a dilemma. Looking for more upside and partaking in the bullish trend is a logical thought and perhaps even wager, but the use of leverage while battling the intraday and intraweek reversals in the marketplace make the ambition of profiting on Gold comparable to time spent at the casino. We know winners talk much louder about their money gained compared to the losers who vanish into the crowd and keep quiet.

So I write this as a warning, Gold may not be worth more one year from now than it is today. However, I will venture forth the notion that in ten years time Gold will be significantly valued higher than it is today. Will inflation suddenly be tamed globally, will confidence in fiat currencies emerge with a strong dose of optimism? No. Certain fiat currencies will do better than others via Forex. However, as a store of value Gold will likely remain an impressive asset to own.

post297

Significant Highs All Around as Speculation Grows Frothy

Significant Highs All Around as Speculation Grows Frothy

Gold, platinum, and the major U.S indices are all flirting with record values. Fast trading is being seen on all fronts, dangerous reversals are also being displayed and causing harm for day traders. The U.S government shutdown remains in full force. Not enough pain has been heard from the U.S public yet which would make politicians pause and actually try to negotiate a deal.

Milestone apex values have been experienced. Gold has produced the 4,000.00 USD per ounce level and sustained value, the Nasdaq 100 toppled 25,000.00 the past two days, but has moved lower for the moment. Conditions for day traders are swift and they need to be careful. And while the U.S government is shuttered, the Federal Reserve is still expected to announce their FOMC interest rate decision on the 29th of October. A Federal Funds Rate cut of 25 basis points is still anticipated.

Gold Three Month Chart as of 8th October 2025

Forex has seen jittery results as the EUR, GBP, JPY have struggled in recent trading versus the USD. And while some people may point to the stellar results and values within Gold and Bitcoin as evidence for safe haven wagers being placed, large speculators are playing a key ingredient in the broad markets too. Investors are certainly looking for value and have a belief that buying now represents a discount compared to what Gold and equity values will be over the long-term. However, day traders should also remember that a large amount of influence in the markets derives via behavioral sentiment, and as record highs are being challenged anxiousness grows regarding potential responses from speculative forces particularly when profit taking remains a part of wagering.

Nvidia Three Month Chart as of 8th October 2025

While questions and concerns are heard about a possible AI bubble being experienced and too much money being invested in equities like Nvidia, Oracle, Microsoft, etc., folks need to understand long-term investors are gearing their portfolios towards outlooks. Betting on these companies playing a significant role in technological advancements is a long-term viewpoint which works on optimism. Artificial intelligence is important, but the motor that runs AI infrastructure via semiconductors, big data distribution, servers and cybersecurity are crucial. The promise of quantum computing is also experiencing a surge of investment because of a belief in the future.

USD/JPY Three Month Chart as of 8th October 2025

And that is what day traders who are tempted to bet against the trends in the marketplace need to remember. Investors will not bet against Wall Street because of the government shutdown. In fact, they will certainly be heard joking that corporations run more effectively with less government intrusion.

This is not a simple puzzle. Complexity certainly needs to be considered regarding valuations in the EUR/USD, GBP/USD and USD/JPY. Intriguingly, day traders may want to take a look at the South African Rand too, because technically it continues to be strong against the USD, which is rather out of step and a rather interesting non-correlation. The broad Forex market has lost some its luster for day traders the past year because of a lack of perceived volatility across the board. But volatility may be on the way, the Japanese Yen certainly stands out and should be watched via the USD/JPY and JPY crosses in the coming days and weeks.

post291

India Insider: Why is Gold Frequently Accumulated by Indians?

India Insider: Why is Gold Frequently Accumulated by Indians?

In a society like India in which I live gold hoarding is a fact of life. According to a recent report by the World Gold Council, Indian households are believed to hold around 25,000 tonnes of gold with a combined value of around $3 trillion USD.

Billionaire banker Uday Kotak applauded Indian women when he said they are ”the smartest fund managers in the world”. The precious metal has gained 42% in 2025 alone, and returned 700% in the last 20 years in Indian Rupee terms. In India consumers have a habit of monitoring daily gold prices. There is a gold festival in India called Aksayatritiyai, when gold is bought frequently in small grams but often also includes large purchases for religious sentiments. In Northern India, gold is bought during festival times like Dhanteras and believed to bring prosperity and good fortune.

It’s almost unthinkable for marriages to occur in India without gold. Many marriages have been postponed and even stopped if the requisite dowry is not given by a girl’s family. And there was a time in India when some families didn’t want to have a baby girl due to the excessive gold dowry they would be responsible for and have to give a boy’s family at the time of marriage. 

Adam Smith’s Case Against Gold:

Smith lashed out at gold for its lack of productiveness. He wrote in the The Wealth of Nations, “labour was the first price, the original purchase-money that was paid for all things. It was not by gold or by silver, but by labour, that all the wealth of the world was originally purchased; and its value, to those who possess it, and who want to exchange it for some few productions, is precisely equal to the quantity of labour which it can enable them to purchase or command.”

The act of hoarding, whether it is money or gold, depresses economic activity, as demonstrated by John Maynard Keynes in his ‘paradox of thrift’. Indeed, it was the Europeans by spending all the precious metals taken from the Americas which boosted economic activity, and ultimately sparked the rise of modern capitalism whereas Asians by hoarding ended up falling behind.

Ancient China Example:

In the past, China’s reliance on silver gave short-term stability but stunted long term growth. With no domestic silver, it depended on inflows from Spain and Japan, making its money supply hostage to global trade. Wars or disruptions cut silver inflows, draining liquidity while crippling tax collection. Unlike Europe, China clung to silver as ‘real’ money, while neglecting credit, banking and bonds. This rigid system weakened the nation’s fiscal capacity, leaving China unable to mobilize resources or industrialize effectively. In the end, silver ensured stability, but strangled flexibility and growth. Indian growth has been strangled too often because of an over-obsession towards gold.

Why Gold Prices are Moving Up?

The price of gold was relatively stable until the 2008 financial crisis and it’s been rising steadily ever since, doubling in 3 years from 2009 to 2012. After some broad consolidation, gold has been in a higher value band if you scrupulously study charts. Arguably, it is an influence due to lower interest rates that have helped gold prices move up for 15 years as inflation has been attempted to be camouflaged by Central Banks.

Accumulation of Central Bank Holding of Gold into 2024

Central Banks also accumulate gold for many reasons. One reason for this are rising bond yields that make existing fiscal obligations underperform for governments. Central Banks buy gold to diversify and hedge against risk. As the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum – an independent body – noted recently, many European national bank systems endure massive losses because of quantitative easing. When the institutions try to undertake quantitative tightening, they are forced to sell at market prices, which deepen their balance sheets losses. Thus, Central Banks diversify into gold as a sacrosanct hedge against losses incurred and allows them to offset many liabilities. Gold has a long historical track record of working as a safeguard against inflation.

It’s also true that gold is often accumulated by Central Banks when hedging against geopolitical uncertainty. The Russia and Ukraine war offers intrigue regarding the nation of Kyrgyzstan, which China uses as a route for its exports to Russia, this due to Kyrgyzstan’s inherent ability to conduct trade via accessible routes. There is high plausibility that Kyrgyzstan might be converting Russian Ruble surpluses into gold.

Monetary Policy Matters for Gold:

Gold will remain vital for many years to come as a store of value and a safe haven. Buying the precious metal delivers investors and businesses a needed hedge against inflation. Protections against the lose of purchasing power within their own fiat currencies remains important for all people.

The Indian public and other societies need to remember, the value of gold within their own currencies often lies within the interest rate valuations sparked by Central Banks mechanisms which sometimes amount to magic shows and influence demand. While public buying of gold is important, it sometimes equates into mere speculation and does not always help economic activity.

post279

Wolf of Wall Street: Greed, Bad Ethics, Sales and Notoriety

Wolf of Wall Street: Greed, Bad Ethics, Sales and Notoriety

Book corner: The Wolf of Wall Street by Jordan Belfort

I was just a greedy little bastard, and not just greedy for money but also for sex and for power and for the admiration of my peers and for just about anything else you can imagine. – Jordan Belfort

Welcome to The Wolf of Wall Street, exstockbroker and trader Jordan Belfort’s autobiographical paean to greed. Reading like a twisted success saga — like a Horatio Alger tale that went left instead of right — Belfort describes his life at the helm of Stratton Oakmont, a Long Island, NY brokerage house which he founded in 1989.

Equal parts shocking, drugged-up, zany, and hysterically funny, Belfort’s story — confession would be a more suitable word — tells how Stratton Oakmont gained notoriety for its widespread use of pump and dump schemes, an illegal practice whereby a stock’s worth is artificially inflated and then sold at a higher price.

Stratton Oakmont racked up plenty of victims and fortunately its tenure was brief. The FBI, the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) and the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission were on Belfort’s scent for years and would eventually shut it down in 1996. Belfort made a fortune but would serve 22 months in prison, where he began writing his memoirs, later to be shaped into this 2007 book. Wolf was a bestseller and Belfort wrote a followup two years later, Catching the Wolf of Wall Street, in which he tells his origin story and how he formed his crew, and also serves a sequel to the events of the first book.

In 2013, director Martin Scorsese released the film The Wolf of Wall Street, combining elements of both books. Scorsese shaped the film like a white-collar version of his earlier masterpiece, Goodfellas, with Leonardo DiCaprio portraying Belfort as a 1990s version of Henry Hill. The movie was a financial and critical success, and garnered accolades not only for DiCaprio’s performance — he won Best Actor at the Golden Globes — but also for Margot Robbie as Belfort’s wife and Oscarnominated Jonah Hill as his business partner (the names of the people upon which they were based were changed for the movie). Belfort himself has a bit part in the film.
 
A Jewish kid from middleclass Bayside, Queens, Belfort focuses Wolf on three areas: 1) his legal struggles 2) Stratton Oakmont and its excesses, and 3) his rampant drug use, physical ailments, and marital tensions — often weaving all three into the same scene.
 
In the first focus of the book, his legal struggles, one gets the impression that he enjoyed writing this part of the book the least, although that is understandable. Stratton Oakmont’s financial crimes broke a laundry list of federal and state regulations and before his arrest Belfort was forced to spend considerable time, money, and imagination in hiding them from the authorities.
 
Stratton Oakmont specialized in selling penny stocks, which are inexpensive stock shares from smaller companies. Although usually marketed to investors of more limited means, Stratton Oakmont marketed them to unsuspecting wealthier investors, making an insane amount of money in the process. A classic boiler room operation, brokers were trained to sell using slick, cuttingedge, highpressure tactics. The firm thrived on manipulation and deception, with an intense focus on closing deals no matter the ethical cost.
 
A significant portion of the book is dedicated to explaining Stratton Oakmont’s approach to stock price manipulation. Belfort’s traders would artificially drive up the stock price of a company during its Initial Public Offering (IPO), while retaining more shares of that company than SEC regulations permitted. Belfort uses the example of Steve Madden Shoes, a company he helped take public, to demonstrate this practice.
 
Belfort outlines how stock manipulation during an IPO works: He would invest heavily in a new business, like Steve Madden Shoes, and then leverage his controlling stake to take the company public. Belfort’s brokers would use aggressive tactics to inflate the stock price when selling to investors. Once the price reached a certain level, Belfort would sell enough of his shares to recover the cost of his initial investment — meaning he paid nothing for the remaining shares, which were now worth significantly more.
 
However, under SEC rules, an investment firm sponsoring an IPO is only allowed to hold a limited amount of stock in the company they are offering, but Belfort and Stratton Oakmont held far more Madden shares than the law allowed.
 
Belfort was also involved in money laundering, a scheme that began when he secretly traveled to Switzerland, a nation notorious for hiding money. The Swiss bankers he met with openly explained how the Swiss banking system hides vast sums of money and how they avoid cooperating with foreign institutions, like the U.S. SEC. Since the practice of issuing “numbered” bank accounts without names ceased after World War II, Belfort’s first step was to open accounts under the names of proxies, similar to those who held his stock. These individuals were tasked with smuggling large amounts of cash across the border, so Belfort relied on people he trusted who wouldn’t raise suspicion — including his wife’s elderly British aunt and a member of one of his drug dealers’ Swiss relatives.
 
As a sidenote, Belfort comes across as cynical to the whole stockbroking profession. He argues that stockbrokers, including himself, don’t truly produce anything of value and lack any specialized stock market knowledge. At their core, he says, they’re essentially just slick salesmen, especially after Belfort taught his crew highpowered sales scripts that drew customers into opening their wallets. With this training, Belfort says, even a high school or college graduate can be taught to talk like a stock market expert, which leads into the second focus of the book, the atmosphere at Stratton Oakmont.
 
In staffing Stratton Oakmont, Belfort eschewed licensed brokers (those who passed the Series 7 exam) and instead brought in a more impressionable team, a hardscrabble gang of local kids fired up to make big bucks. The place was awash in money and to reward the brokers for their highly stressful — and aggressive — jobs, Belfort spared no expense in keeping them happy. He cultivated a bacchanalian, partylike atmosphere, a sort of adult frathouse full of sex, hookers and drugs.
 
During his tenure at Stratton Oakmont, Belfort became known for his loud and proud persona. He would routinely motivate his troops by giving thumping, overthetop speeches (marvelously reenacted by DiCaprio in the movie), preaching like an evangelist about the glory of earning big money.
 
The book’s final focus is his drug use, physical ailments, and marital tensions, three issues that are tragically intertwined.
 
Belfort suffered from intense back pain and sleep problems, the latter which plagued him since childhood. As an adult, the chaotic and party-fueled atmosphere at Stratton Oakmont enabled him to indulge easily, and he would use a powerful cocktail of drugs to cope. He was particularly known for his abuse of Quaaludes, a hypnotic sedative drug which he used recreationally and frequently, often mixing them with alcohol or other substances, but it became a full-blown addiction. Besides Quaaludes, he also used cocaine, morphine, and other prescription medications.
 
Belfort reported frequent blackouts and memory loss due to mixing drugs, especially Quaaludes and alcohol. He often had no recollection of things he said or did while under the influence, sometimes waking up to damage, arrests, or people furious at him. He had multiple close calls with overdoses, particularly from taking too many sedatives or mixing drugs dangerously. In one story, he recalls almost choking to death on his own vomit after passing out. Longterm drug use left him in a nearconstant mental haze, affecting decision-making, mood, and impulse control.
 
Belfort describes in cringing details the most notorious effects of his Quaalude abuse, the loss of basic motor control. He described episodes where he was physically unable to walk, speak clearly, or even stand up — calling these “cerebral palsy phases.” There’s a wild (and comic) scene — later portrayed in the movie — where he attempts to crawl to his car while stoned out of his mind.
 
Belfort writes at length on his wives and family life, and herein lies the part which Belfort seems to have enjoyed writing the most.
 
Belfort met his first wife, a local Queens beauty, after college while working as a meat salesman. The business thrived for a while, thanks to Belfort’s silver-tongued persuasion abilities. But after overextending himself, the business went under, leaving him with a young wife and bills to pay. By all his accounts, his wife stuck by him through the lean times and he has not had (at least publicly) an unkind word to say about her. But Belfort ended up leaving her for a Londonborn and Brooklynraised model, Nadine Caridi, a stunning beauty whom he met at a party. His life with the Duchess — as he refers to her due to her birth country and British heritage — provides some of the most memorable scenes, and their life together became a bizarre mix of luxury, chaos, and toxicity (not to mention lust).
 
The two met when Belfort was already rich from Stratton Oakmont and their relationship quickly became intense. Marrying in the early 90’s, Belfort provided Caridi with a glam life of extreme wealth: yachts, mansions, exotic vacations, and nonstop partying. Belfort showered her with expensive gifts and built a lavish life for them and their children in one of the most expensive areas of Long Island. Their megamansion boasted a helicopter pad, a swimming pool, tennis courts, servants galore and a fleet of luxury cars.
 
But behind all the glamour, things became unstable. Belfort and Caridi had some intense, ugly shouting matches during their marriage, and they usually exploded over his drug use, infidelity, and parenting. Although Belfort loved his kids dearly, Caridi got especially furious when his reckless behavior endangered them. One of their biggest, most infamous fights was when Belfort, high on drugs, tried to kidnap their daughter and crashed his car into a pillar inside their property (also reenacted in the movie). Their marriage eventually broke down under the weight of Jordan’s addictions and criminal behavior, and they divorced in the early 2000’s.
 
How did it all end for Belfort? After getting cornered by the FBI, who had a strong case against him, Belfort was given a choice: either go to prison for decades, or cooperate and help bring down the dozens of brokers, business partners, and shady investors he worked with. To get a lighter sentence, he agreed to become an informant, wearing a hidden wire during meetings and conversations to secretly record people he worked with. However, a lot of his old friends and colleagues ended up getting arrested and betrayed by him — and he was absolutely hated by many in that world after that.
 
Belfort did easy time at Taft Correctional Institution in California, a lowsecurity federal prison of the type that is called “Club Fed” in popular culture because it is so relaxed and safe compared to the tough penitentiaries that house hardened convicts. While there, he had the odd coincidence of sharing a cell with Tommy Chong, of the classic Cheech & Chong stoner comedy duo. Chong was there for selling bongs online, and the two became friends. It was Chong who encouraged Belfort to write his memoirs. Interestingly enough, his writing style was influenced heavily by Tom Wolfe’s The Bonfire of the Vanities, which he read while there.
 
Belfort’s New York humor shines through the book and is the saving grace throughout the scenes where the crime and sleaze bubble through, although the vulgarity might not appeal to all readers. His antics, though tragic and costly, often come off as comedic, with a rhythm similar to stand-up comedy or a raunchy sitcom. It makes for enjoyable reading but one has to question his motives for portraying the incidents in such a manner.
 
For example, the infamous yacht story — one of the highlights of both the book and the movie and one which Belfort has retold ad nauseum in interviews and personal appearances —involved a hairraising incident where he ordered the captain of his yacht to sail through a 70knot storm, instead of avoiding it, off the coast of Sardinia.
The yacht was battered by massive waves that smashed its windows and hatches, flooding it. Despite the dire conditions, all 27 people on board were rescued by the Italian Navy, but the yacht was lost at sea. Belfort — and unfortunately later Scorsese — play it up as bumbling dark comedy, something that would fit in the first season of Breaking Bad or Michael Bay’s 2014 crime caper Pain and Gain. But after the movie was released, two of the men who were on board the yacht — friends of Belfort since childhood — were interviewed on a local Long Island radio show and told their side of the story. The real events, as they stated, were a horrific, PTSDinducing nightmare in which all aboard — crew included — thought they were about to die.
 

Another problem with the book is that it never actually defines itself. Is it a business book? A morality tale? A success story? A crime story? Is it fratire, the genre popularized by Tucker Max in I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell? It has elements of all of those, but they never truly come together into a cohesive whole. The business and legal sections are hard to follow for the average reader and Belfort didn’t seem interested — or patient enough — in describing the concepts in simpler terms. In fact, like a true salesman, at times he seems more interested in a carefully crafted portrayal of himself where even the self-deprecation — and there are loads of that — contain hints of braggadocio. One can hear him saying as he wrote the book, I had ballsI went for the brass ringI did things that you didn’t dare to do.

After the movie was released in 2013, Jordan Belfort experienced a resurgence in public attention and became a media favorite, interviewing endlessly in his thick, fasttalking Queens accent while regaling a new generation of fans with the stories behind the movie. In time, he eased into the role of elder statesman, becoming an indemand commentator on current financial affairs such as crypto and Wall Street. Belfort also rebranded himself as a motivational speaker and sales trainer, touring internationally and giving seminars on sales techniques, goalsetting, and entrepreneurship. His signature sales methodology, now marketed as the “Straight Line Persuasion” system, has become a core part of his training programs. He also created a podcast, The Wolf’s Den, where he interviews entrepreneurs, influencers, businessmen and others (although it is unclear as of this writing if the podcast is still active).

To his credit, he has shown remorse for his misdeeds and the effect his lifestyle had on his family and has repeatedly stressed the importance of ethics in business and sales. His speeches, as shown on YouTube, are enjoyable and engaging.
Unfortunately, the issue of restitution remains a sticky issue. Currently living in California, he was ordered some years ago to pay $110.4 million in restitution to victims of his stock fraud. However, critics and prosecutors accused him of not paying enough back, particularly in light of earnings from the film, books, and speaking engagements. Belfort has claimed he’s been steadily paying.


Despite the glamorized portrayal in the movie, many people — especially his victims — still view him with suspicion. He remains a controversial figure. Some see him as a charismatic redemption story, while others view him as an unrepentant fraudster profiting off his crimes. Read the book and decide for yourself.

If you want to read another Book Corner article, please visit this review by Evan Rothfeld:
https://www.angrymetatraders.com/post/rich-dad-poor-dad-what-the-rich-teach-their-kids-about-money

post278

Behavioral Sentiment: False Narratives and Noisy Realities

Behavioral Sentiment: False Narratives and Noisy Realities

The past handful of months in Forex have provided day traders problems if they have been trying to pursue steady trends. Constant flashes of rhetoric and news pervading tariff implications, U.S Federal Reserve interpretations from various media and analytical corners, and mixed economic data has caused a rather mired reality for speculators trying to operate.

S&P 500 One Year Chart via Futures CFD Trading on the 9th of September 2025

However, if the noise is turned down by day traders and sometimes given less importance regarding potential influences, signals become visible and some perceptions can be looked upon as roadmaps. While many want to to throw their hands up and proclaim some sort of developing economic meltdown and a coming apocalypse, the major U.S indices are actually performing quite well as a barometer. The S&P 500 is continuing to challenge all-time values. Yes, the Nasdaq 100 and Dow Jones 30 are not marching in lockstep with the S&P 500 to new highs, but they are not far behind. The stock market has never guaranteed people an ability to constantly move upwards, but it does offer the potential to judge outlook and mid-term sentiment.

The USD has been extremely choppy since the start of this year, this as the Trump administration has taken over, but its trend towards weakness has been rather clear. The EUR/USD and GBP/USD have done reasonably well regarding mid-term strength. Yes, the USD/JPY has produced whipsaw movements and the Japanese Yen remains awkward, but this is a direct reflection of mitigating Japanese government policy (some may call it incompetence) regarding its ability to manage fiscal concerns, interest rates, and fight deflation and now inflation (which has been going on for a few decades).

Gold is traversing record heights and is showing signs of sustaining values above 3,600.00 as of yesterday. After languishing (albeit within elevated realms) near 3,350.00 the past handful of months with prevalent volatility, the precious metal has bolted out of its consolidation. And the likely reason for this is the anticipated Federal Reserve policy changes regarding interest rates. 10 Year U.S Treasury yields have also been pushed lower recently – this as financial institutions await a definite cut in interest rates by the Fed on the 17th of September. But folks who believe a 50 point basis reduction is coming late next week are likely wrong.

The Federal Reserve under Chairman Jerome Powell has been quite conservative, this will probably not change next Wednesday. It is more likely a cut of 25 basis points will take place on the 17th, and the FOMC Statement will offer the potential of another interest rate cut in October. Tomorrow’s PPI numbers and Thursday’s CPI results will influence the Fed’s coming meeting and mid-term outlook.

What we are left with is a broad market that is having a lot of noise applied to it by people with a variety of biases. Political bantering has reached a threshold in which it might be best to simply not pay attention to anything – but that is dangerous too. Yes, some people do talk sense, and some people do show signs of actually trying to engage in adult decision making regarding their insights, but it often feels like wanting to sound correct is more important than outcomes. Technical traders may be enjoying a quiet laugh at the expense of fundamental players right now.

However, economic data remains important. While rhetoric from the U.S White House and its opponents remains within a state of hyperbole, day traders should try to turn down the noise and pay attention to signals that long term investors continue to produce and take advantage of their sentiment. Stocks continue to be pursued and indices have done well, but volatility should be expected particularly into next week.