Sunset 20260413

Speculative Prospects and Temptations Via Perilous Opportunities

Desire to Gamble on Perceptions and Risk Management

The markets have acted in a polite fashion as of early trading via Asian and European perspectives today. After this weekend’s proclamation that talks between the U.S and Iran didn’t attain an agreement, there probably weren’t many folks in financial institutions who were surprised by the outcome. Thus the theme, no action is the best action may be holding true as folks simply watch.

While the USD has picked up some momentum in Forex this morning, the gains by the USD against other major currencies have not been significant. However, the near-term will remain tenuous and day traders with a taste for adventure may believe opportunities lurk.

Western Cape Sky

The temptation to take advantage of market situations which hold the prospect of volatility will be strong among many. If a trader were to bet on the right direction and catch momentum from a Forex, equity index or commodity move in WTI Crude Oil, large profits could be found. The realization consisting of ‘what can be gained can also be lost’ must be considered too. Greater velocity in prices means there are risks that must be considered.

USD centric strength this morning has been rather polite, and suggests that if financial institutions are forced to shift their behavioral sentiment greater movements will occur. This sets the table for speculators who want to bet on a chosen direction per their perspective regarding what will unfold in the coming hours and days. 

The U.S White House is talking tough and threatening to blockade the Strait of Hormuz, but nobody really has a clear picture of what that means entirely, nor if it can be done. The Iranians continue to talk tough and say they are in control of the Hormuz. It does appear this body of water will be a chief ignition switch per an escalation for the Middle East conflict. 

The ceasefire which was declared last Tuesday is one week old as of today. The ceasefire agreed upon last week was for 14 days, meaning there is one week left if both sides hold their fire. There are no guarantees tranquility will prevail. If the U.S does go ahead and try to seize the Strait of Hormuz’s sea navigation, this could spell a sudden and loud end to the ceasefire which in theory still exists.

Forex, gold, equity futures have shown no real shockwaves as of today following this weekend’s failure to find a peaceful path forward. Traders who have the ability to be patient and hold onto positions may be able to take advantage of moves that could develop. Serious risk management will be a key part of any wagers taken. The use of very conservative leverage is advised too. Traders also have a hurdle they must consider regarding overnight charges via their brokers if they wish to pursue trades that carry over into the next day.

So what will happen? If the Iranian war becomes loud again there is a real chance the USD will become stronger. The EUR gained quite well against the USD since the announced ceasefire and it looks like it remains in what may be considered overbought territory, particularly if fiery rhetoric turns into missiles being launched again.

However, as some analysts have pointed out, there is a chance the worst of the news and its negative impact has already been traded into the marketplace. There is a temptation to believe USD centric strength in Forex, and price action in the S&P 500, Nasdaq 100, Dow 30 and its international counterparts have already suffered massive negative selloffs and that any declines that take place now will be met with reversals higher. Yet, betting on this type of shifting sentiment by day traders is akin to throwing darts at a moving target, because the volatility and timeframes will prove difficult for those betting on momentum spikes. And things in the Middle East could actually get worse.

Thus, day traders should remain cautious. If they want to wager on noise developing into a violent rupture again in the Middle East they might be proven correct. The near-term remains dangerous. Day traders have an opportunity to catch a news cycle that delivers the turbulence they believe may happen. Stop losses need to be used though, in case the Middle East saga takes an unexpected turn. It is unlikely that peace is going to suddenly break out, but rumors about Saudi Arabia is talking with the U.S about a more coordinated regional enclave that involves the U.A.E and Israel is creating attention. Yet, the fog of war via verbal interludes which seem improbable, and realities that are pushed to the limit hold no promises either.

Wagering on what is going to happen over the next few days and into next week in the Middle East is a gamble. And this may explain a lot of the sideways price action seen early today, and the rather pragmatic conservative approach by financial institutions as they play a game of wait and see.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

Gold 20260409

Intraday Blues as Trading Conditions Remain Perilous

Red Flags Persists for Day Traders and Hedge Funds as More Wild Surf Predicted

Risk on or risk off? Day traders and hedge funds, two groups who are known to speculate, have both suffered considerably the past handful of weeks due to the market turbulence. While falls of 4 to 5% the past handful of weeks for long-term investors can be digested with proper patience and accumulation ability, those who are using leverage or making monster sized bets on intraday speculation continue to suffer from widespread anxiousness within the marketplace.

Gold One Year Chart as of 9th March 2026

WTI Crude Oil should have gone back down below $80.000 in many folks thinking – and they may have bet on this strike price via options –  due to ideas of an Iranian ceasefire, but the target has not been met. WTI did in fact challenge $88.000 early this week, but it is back around $93.000.

With the weekend quickly approaching and concerns about what will happen when the marketplace is largely shuttered, March mayhem has opened the door for April surprises. Gold is near $4,737.00, and this price remains mildly upsetting for many who believed it would act as a safe haven asset that would gain during the war, but hasn’t responded with buying fever. Gold was near $5,180.00 on the 27th of February. But in fact gold has performed rather well considering it was riding a long-term speculative buying spree and its current price still remains well above where is was last year around this time near $2920.00.

The point? The markets still exists and can still be bet on. The parameters may have changed, but let’s recall at this time last year global investors were dealing with the potential of Trump tariffs which was an entirely other set of hypersonic conditions caused by noise. If you don’t like loud markets you can cover your ears. You can try to take advantage of them too, but day trading the marketplace via Forex, commodities and stock indices has always been gambling. Perhaps this is what you are looking for – price action.

Again, the global markets are not concerned with your feelings. If you want to cry, grab a tissue and sit on the sidelines until the big show is over. However, know that the Iranian war is certain to have an encore from either a new round of potential fighting in the Middle East via stresses caused by the said openings/closings of the Hormuz Strait, or some other entirely new flashpoint elsewhere. 

The S&P 500 closed slightly below 6783.00 yesterday, last year the index was close to 5,745.00. Sometimes the best thing all traders and investors can do is take a deep breath and believe in better days.

Near-term price action will remain choppy. That is very easy to say and agree to, yet it tells you nothing. It doesn’t tell you what the markets are going to do today or tomorrow. And the reason for that is that intraday performance at this juncture is being driven by swiftly changing sentiment in which momentum is a swirling sea. Technical traders may claim they have a handle on the price skirmishes via their perceptions, but are likely suffering like everyone else as they try to surf the rather wild waves.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

postN50

Clear Betting Environment Is a Winning Proposition for Brokers, Not Day Traders

Things Unlikely To Get Easier for Retail Speculators Remainder of Week

I would like to offer day traders encouragement under the current market circumstances. However, the reality is that the next handful of days will remain difficult for retail traders who do not have comfortable amounts of cash to absorb when intraday chaos occurs. On the other hand as an ex-risk manager for a brokerage house, I can state that CFD providers are singing joyfully because they are making profits from the wild fluctuations in equity indices, Forex and commodities.

Gasoline and Burning Cash Continues

A case in point are the results via the future markets, this via CFD offerings by brokers’ platforms yesterday for the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100. Early nervousness saw an electric amount of selling get demonstrated and then suddenly a reversal higher, this as President Trump caused a thunderous optimistic reaction as he spoke about the potential of a deal with Iran in the coming days. The dose of optimistic risk taking lasted a couple of hours.

Not only did U.S equity indices bolt higher, but WTI Crude Oil prices slid lower, and Forex suddenly saw the USD losing strength. Here’s the thing, some day traders certainly made money as waves of momentum carried their wagers into positive terrain, but many speculators were likely knocked out of the their trades with sudden loses. CFD trading using leverage has always been a casino, this is not going to change. But the volatility seen the past three weeks has likely not created great wealth for retail traders. Some have gained certainly, but I can guarantee you brokers are making more money via the intraday swings and volatility that knock smaller traders out, this as leverage causes fluctuations that expose too much risk and cause folks to lose money.

Again, this is the nature of the beast. Day traders wanting to participate in the markets have to acknowledge the risks that will confront them. It is a warning worth noting once again as a war rages in the Middle East. 

Markets in the best of times are difficult. Risk management is constantly needed. While the thrill of trading is fantastic, without solid tactics speculating equates into gambling. Think of brokers as bookies, they gear the market via wide spreads, transaction fees including overnight charges to favor themselves. Brokers are certainly glad to pay out winners so others are enticed and bring more business, but strategic day traders who use well practiced methodology are watched closely by brokers – because these folks (good traders who are careful) are a threat for brokers bottom lines – profits are king.

Trading and fundamental notions are proving dangerous too during these loud times. Gold for instance which was trading at all-time highs in January (along with silver – but that is another speculative story) is now traversing near $4,425.00. The precious metal was testing the $5,600.00 vicinity in late January. So how did this long heralded safe haven metal actually see a selloff become stronger since the start of the Iranian war when it was around $5,200.00 on the 27th of February?

IMO, it shows that speculative fervor in gold was fever pitched in January, and even though a war has broken out and caused widespread anxiety in the broad markets (which in theory is supposed to make gold more valuable), the volatile nature of wagering – yes gambling – on the markets including gold, often is a crapshoot. Folks who bought gold as a speculative endeavor have now cashed out their profits, those who believe gold is a safe haven and are buying based on this belief will need another round of speculative fuel to induce significant gains like those made in January. The market sometimes runs out of participants when things get too cautious. In other words, if there are not enough buyers, selling momentum takes over.

And to put a finishing touch on this piece, let there be no doubt that brokers were likely relieved that the one way avenue upwards for gold (and silver) seen into January has now turned into a volatile betting battle. The point here, if I am able to make one is this, market conditions are rough and will remain extreme in the coming days. Folks need to be cautious, the markets are not your friend, they are a tool for making money (or losing it).

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

WTI Crude Oil 20260309

Fear Factor High in Oil Markets and Outlook is King

WTI Crude Oil Trading in a Storm (War)

Writing from within the storm, it would be easy to feel a strong sense of nervousness as the newest Middle East War rages. However, this is unlikely the beginning of World War 3. Traders looking at WTI Crude Oil this morning have seen the commodity launch over $110.00. But the price has seen a slight dip and is now hovering above $105.00 in albeit fast conditions.

WTI Crude Oil Three Month Chart on 9th March 2026

Behavioral sentiment is nervous, there is no disregarding that notion and taking it seriously. Iran has been firing missiles and drones at neighbors and Saudi Arabia has been effected via some of their oil production. The Strait of Hormuz is certainly seeing an escalation in tension and is threatening to become a sea battle.

However, while the price of WTI Crude Oil rocks higher and day traders either make or lose money fast, speculators wager on short and near-term notions, there is likely a group of folks taking another approach and watching cash prices compared to options.

Yes, the intra-day price of WTI Crude Oil and all other energy sources will remain volatile near-term, but those with a mid and long-term outlook may be betting on optimism and the belief an end game will produce calmer prices. 

WTI Crude Oil is up close to 40% percent when a mid-term perspective is used. Will the commodity remain above 100.00 USD six months from now? Will WTI Crude Oil be above $100.00 three months from now or even one?

This thinking may deliver some type of price resistance in WTI Crude Oil. Certainly, there is a chance of greater escalation. But even though it was widely reported that oil facilities in Iran were bombed this weekend by Israel, the terminals hit were on the outskirts of Teheran, not on the island of Kharg. As dangerous as the war has become and the potential of worse damage occurring, those who are striking Iran do not want to damage Kharg terminals – at least not yet.

As for endgame, Russian oil is being allowed to be sold more easily, sanctions have been relaxed. Thus, it can be said there are international efforts to fight against price spikes. There are concerns about higher oil prices causing bedlam via inflation for the global economy rightfully. However, at some juncture things will eventually calm down. And that is what day traders need to keep in mind as WTI Crude Oil has raced higher, the notion that tactically the Iranian war will reach a de-escalation period is reasonable. 

Yes, there is a threat that Iran plays the an ‘Armageddon’ card and tries to destroy all vital energy resources in the Middle East, but we have likely passed that stage. Iran in many respects, respectfully, has been declawed. Iran can threaten, but can it really bite at this point? The island of Kharg is a key barometer, its facilities remain mostly kept out of the destruction zone, WTI Crude Oil may not spike too much higher.

As for highs, this morning’s jump occurred on fear, however the price has started to calm. We could certainly still see higher values in WTI Crude Oil this week or next, but thoughts about the potential of an end game resolving the current dangers, whatever that may be and no matter how long it will take – may prove to be an important ointment.  Time shall tell.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

postN88

Iran, Oil and The Crumbling of a Criminal Dictatorial Wall

Iran, Oil and The Crumbling of a Criminal Dictatorial Wall

Step aside for a moment from the conspiracy theorists and let’s consider that the U.S did not take out Maduro of Venezuela in order to facilitate more supply of oil. Let’s consider the possibility that Maduro was removed because he did not facilitate free enterprise and ran a criminal enterprise that did not favor the U.S.

WTI Crude Oil One Year Chart as of 9th January 2026

Venezuela has the largest demonstrated oil reserves in the world, but the U.S has done rather well without it for years. The Trump administration’s move to take over Venezuela deters China and Russia’s influence in the Americas, while also putting another nail in the coffin of the Cuban regime. The word regime is used implicitly to point out that Venezuela, Russia, China and Cuba are all regimes of one sort via their one party ruling systems. Yes, you can argue the United State has returned to an imperialist philosophy, but that doesn’t mean it has dictatorial rule. Some will argue that point, I understand. But let’s step away from the complexity of political biases – including my own – and insights and discuss oil for a moment.

The takeover of the Venezuelan oil infrastructure, which has not happened in full yet via the U.S military action, does not mean U.S oil companies will make trillions of dollars from the adventure immediately. In fact a glut of oil is one of the potential consequences if Venezuela were to return to an open market system with its energy supply. Yes, the price of oil would in theory likely get cheaper. While it can be argued that this will help the U.S consumers, however many U.S producers of the shale oil industry would be put in a difficult spot. Producing oil from shale deposits requires hydraulic fracturing – known as fracking – and is an expensive endeavor. Cheaper oil from Venezuela in other words could put small and medium producers in the U.S out of business if supply becomes too ample

Now let’s turn our attention to Iran and the attempted revolution that is fomenting a reaction from the regime of that nation. Oil supply is certainly at stake for the world, but there is the overwhelmingly important possibility of allowing 90 million plus people to live in a system without repression. As of last night internet and telephone lines have been shuttered by the dictatorial government. There is a legitimate fear that many people protesting for their rights to be free now face the risk of violence and some have already begun to pay with their lives. Freedom is more important than oil for the people of Iran and Venezuela. It should also be pointed out that Venezuela and Iran are members of OPEC and this is likely not going to change.

The Trump administration is threatening military action against the Iranian rulers, but it is questionable how the regime of Iran could be overthrown by outside forces if there are not active combat boots the ground. While it may be possible to attempt a Venezuela like mission in Iran, that would be difficult at best considering the regime is already paranoid and on high alert. The civilians of Iran will have to do a lot of the work by themselves. Which means the populace of Iran will need to be able to organize and collectively topple a dictatorship, and this is unlikely to be done by handing out flowers. The regular army of Iran must disobey orders and the police must decide not to participate in violence against the protesters, allowing a seizure of power by the people.

At this juncture it remains difficult to say what will happen in Iran, except to say that there is likely going to be blood spilled. The Berlin Wall fell after decades of Cold War between the West and East. The wall of the Islamic Republic of Iran which was declared in the first week of April 1979 has nearly been running its dictatorship as long as the communists controlled Eastern Europe.

If and it is a big if, the Iranian people are able to topple the Islamic Republic of Iran it would be a game changer the world over. The complexity of the mafia style state that the current dictatorship has controlled not only in the Middle East, but throughout South America and elsewhere via influence with its proxies like Hezbollah is enormous. The dismantling of this network would take longer than the toppling of the Iranian regime. The world is unlikely to ever know in full detail the criminal activity of the current Iranian government and its proxies worldwide.

This is not about oil, it is about freedom. However, if the oil of Iran suddenly came under the control of a Western looking Iran that was unshackled, yes it would add to a vast amount of energy that the world already enjoys, but OPEC would find a way to manage the supply.

If Iran were to join the ranks of free nations and castoff its current leadership the world would benefit greatly. Only nations and proxies that gain from the exploitation of the Iranian dictatorship would worry. If the Iranian dictatorship falls there will not be paradise, but the event would be significant and transform the current state of global affairs.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

postN75

U.S National Security, Part 3: Don’t Underemphasize Freedom

U.S National Security, Part 3: Don't Underemphasize Freedom

Opinion: The following article is commentary and its views are solely those of the author. This article was first published the 30th of December via The Angry Demagogue.

 

Conclusion

The post-Cold War world that the Strategy Paper tries to figure out is much more than the collapse of the Soviet Union and the rise of China. One of the main goals of the Trump administration is to turn the clock back on “globalization”, be it via tariffs, other economic ways or even, military means.

While the world is panicking over AI’s destruction of good white collar jobs, it has, paradoxically, created a world where the auto industry can’t find enough qualified mechanics at nice six figure salaries. Not even ten years ago the journalists were haranguing out of work blue collar workers with “go learn to code”, the beer guzzling crew can now tell the tearful journalists and Hollywood “writers” who can’t write better than AI to “go learn how to weld” (or at least handle a screwdriver). But the strategic issues we are facing go beyond manufacturing jobs.

The challenge to the United States and to other free countries is how to handle a new reality where massive debt threatens the diminution, if not the destruction, of the life style we have all come to take for granted and where revanchist regimes don’t quite understand that their power and “prestige” is a result of what has been built in those free countries they want to replace. China, like Russia, Iran, Turkey, Qatar and the non-state actors like Hamas, Hezbollah, the Moslem Brotherhood and others don’t quite understand that while they can use, and even sometimes improve on what freedom has provided them, they will stagnate once they attain their goal of defeating and destroying the free world.

As advanced as China becomes and even if it flies to the moon, overtakes the United States in AI and quantum computing and manages to make the United States into only the breadbasket of the world, they will stagnate as only free markets and free people can move the world to the next step. Growth can only be accomplished by free people. True enough, the economy often grows in ways that we don’t always like, the alternative is stagnation and a return to the pre-scientific age. For all the talk of “new man” and “progress” and everything else that the Soviet Union strived to create, they produced no medicines, no medical devices and no medical treatments.

Therefore, the defeat of the revanchist world and the preservation of freedom needs to be the paramount goal of American foreign policy. This does not mean the creation of democracies where none have ever existed and it does not mean sending troops in every time a political prisoner is arrested or even a plan to militarily defeat the CCP, but it does mean always supporting free countries against the unfree even when the United States is also “friends” with the unfree one.

This means that it will also give free countries leeway when their interests do not align perfectly with America’s (non-core) interests. America as sole protector of the free world has leverage that America as midwife to a set of regional alliances does not. This is a choice that America can make and a correct reading of the Strategy Paper tells us that the United States no longer wants to or can be the main power in every region in the world. This means that there needs to be a change in attitude in America so that it cannot force its will on its allies just because there is another contract to be had or another “cause” that has caught the eye of the country’s establishment.

Encouraging regional alliances of free countries such as the new Eastern-Med Alliance that has already been established between Greece, Cyprus and Israel is a prime example. In addition to the economic cooperation there has been joint defense training and there are agreements that will lead to a defense cooperation pact if not a NATO-like security treaty. Turkey is the common competitor, or enemy, of these three countries. Turkey claims certain Greek islands, occupies parts of Cyprus and has designs on Israel as it strives to be the Islamic “liberator” of Jerusalem. There are gas exploration agreements and cooperation and there would have been a pipeline to Europe if the Biden administration had not stopped it (while they approved the Russian-German pipeline).

Italy ought to be a natural member of the East-Med Alliance and maybe the dissolution of NATO will make them realize that they have more in common with Israel and Greece than they think they do. If Italy were to join then that would create a powerful naval and air deterrence of free countries against aggressors in the eastern Mediterranean. The addition of Malta, a small but strategically important country south of Sicily would provide naval bases that could control the sea lanes between north Africa and Europe helping to stem illegal migration and Turkish attempts to control those same lanes. Malta also brings with it a history of defeating Suleiman the Magnificent in a four month siege when the Ottomans tried to conquer this important island. As we stated before, the United States as a “midwife” to alliances cannot instruct countries on their own national interests. That means that allies of the United States will clash but America must always come down on the side of the free countries and not the revanchist power – in this case, Turkey.

There are of course other regional alliances that can come into being and a remake of the post-WWII world is in order. The end of the cold war created economic booms across the globe raising hundreds of millions of people out of poverty, but recent decades have seen an increase in terror and tyranny and that itself needs to be dealt with. If not by the United States alone then by the US along with the regional alliances that the Strategy Paper has highlighted and we have demarcated (partially) here. But concepts like “territorial integrity” (see Syria, Somalia and the rest of Africa) and “sovereignty” have lost their moral imperative as they are used as excuses by tyrants (and their enablers at the UN) to further their cruelty. One of the faults of the old “liberal international order” has been allowing tyrannies the same rights and respect as free countries. During the Cold War, when nuclear war loomed, this might have made sense but after the fall of the Soviet Union these “principles” have created more harm than good.

In the National Security Strategy of the administration, the words “free” and “freedom” appear twenty times, but never in the context of an alliance of free countries. While it speaks of freedom of religion and speech and free markets it never speaks of the need to put allies that are free ahead of friends that are not free. Allies are those countries that share values and will come to your aid because of that. Friends, in international affairs, are those that look to short-term gain and have no desire to further your values or interests. There is no reason that the United States, in its current fiscal condition needs to fight the fight of freedom around the world alone, but neither can it abandon that fight in the pursuit of short-term contracts or frivolous causes.

Disclaimer: the views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of the author, and not necessarily the opinions reflected by angrymetatraders.com or its associated parties.

You can follow Ira Slomowitz via The Angry Demagogue on Substack https://iraslomowitz.substack.com/ 

postN72

U.S National Security: USD Reserve Currency Importance

U.S National Security: USD Reserve Currency Importance

Opinion: The following article is commentary and its views are solely those of the author. This article was first published the 23rd of December via The Angry Demagogue.

We would like to start going through the U.S administration’s National Security Strategy released last month. There is a lot in there – much of it the same as in past administrations and much of it different. The tone of course is full Trump and while the introductory parts try to make it into a revolutionary document it does in fact build upon much of what has been American foreign policy for decades. One thing it most certainly gets right is that American foreign policy since the end of the Cold War has not found its compass. From a unitary world to one dependent upon global organizations, from a sharing of goals with western Europe to a pivot to Asia, from the war on terror and the middle east to Russia-Ukraine, the United States has struggled to find its way in the post-Cold War world.

We however will concentrate today on one aspect of the strategy, the third bullet in part III – “What Are America’s Available Means to Get What We Want?”. The third bullet point speaks of America having “The world’s leading financial system and capital markets, including the Dollar’s global reserve currency status” – a point that no one with any knowledge of global capital markets can not accept. The end of the bullet point – the Dollar’s global reserve currency status – is the most important because it underscores America’s leadership and essentially allows the United States of America to finance its military and its welfare state. The U.S Dollar as the “reserve currency” means that nearly all the world’s goods are quoted and therefore sold in Dollars.

Why is that important to the United States? Because the U.S government depends on its ability to issue Treasury bonds and bills at will – something no other government can do. It can do this because for another country to buy oil or copper or titanium or corn or soybeans from a country that is not their own– they need access to Dollars. Saudi Arabia and the other gulf states quote the price of oil in U.S Dollars and demand payment in U.S Dollars. The Saudis can deposit those Dollars in American banks or in what is called Eurodollar deposits in foreign banks (there are some 13 trillion Dollars in Eurodollar accounts globally). The Eurodollar accounts are essentially promises by the bank to give U.S Dollars to the holder when he makes a withdrawal. This strengthens the U.S capital markets and allows investors to have better and more investment choices. It is not only America’s often superior companies that bring profits to 401k’s and pension funds but the liquidity and vastness of America’s capital markets that can list domestic and foreign corporations. The reserve currency leading to the advanced capital markets allows the world – and America – to do this.

The U.S Treasury market is so liquid because every country needs Dollars in order to trade. They need to have enough dollar reserves since no one actually wants their own currency. In Israel, for example, local gas companies cannot buy oil with Israeli Shekels, since what will Azerbaijan, for example, do with them? There are only so many products that Israel can sell them. They need Dollars so that they are free to buy other commodities or other products.

The U.S Dollar as a reserve currency also is a break on inflation since the price of oil and other commodities is always in U.S Dollars. A weak or strong U.S Dollar influences the inflation rate in non-USD countries. A weak Israeli Shekel, South African Rand or Chinese Yuan does not influence the price of gasoline in the United States.

In short – as the Trump Administration understands well, the dollar as a reserve currency is a luxury the U.S cannot give up. The lack of the USD as a reserve currency could cause the Dollar to collapse and along with it the price of U.S Treasuries. As UST prices drop, their yields will rise and the cost of financing the U.S government will make interest payments on debt to rise well beyond its already absurd figure of over 4% of GDP – while debt itself is 120% of GDP. The U.S government currently pays over $1 trillion in debt service (interest payments on its bonds and bills). By contrast, the U.S defense budget for 2024 was $836 billion (about 3.3% of GDP).

We need to ask ourselves what can challenge the USD as the reserve currency and what could happen that would encourage the world to change? While the E.U had dreams of making the Euro an alternative reserve currency, the lack of growth in the E.U’s economy and population have put that dream to rest. The only other country that could theoretically replace the United States as the global economic go to country could be China. While in the long run, China’s lack of openness would probably mean that the Yuan would not last long as the reserve currency, that does not mean that they couldn’t jolt the global economy just enough to force it to use the Yuan to buy oil and other commodities.

China is already cornering the market on rare earth minerals and it making inroads in Africa where it mines all sorts of commodities from gold to copper to platinum and so many others (Africa has about 30% of global mineral reserves). That in itself is not enough to rock the global markets and cause a change in how the world does business.

Oil though, is that one thing that could allow China to challenge the USD as the reserve currency, even if it just presents the Yuan as an alternative.

How could that happen?

A Chinese takeover of Taiwan, by whatever means it uses would give the Chinese Communist Party control not only of the South China Sea but also allow its noisier and inferior (to America’s) submarine fleet to enter the Pacific and patrol it freely. The Chinese Navy, with a base on the “other” side of Taiwan would give it control of the north-south sea lanes that Japan and South Korea are dependent upon. Essentially, Chinese control of Taiwan would put Japan, South Korea, Vietnam and the Philippines at the mercy of the Chinese Navy. China could blockade these countries but that would be an act of war and then involve the navies of those countries and possibly the United States. It would affect the global economy negatively but it would not cause a change in world’s reserve currency. But, what if China works out a deal with Saudi Arabia to quote and sell their oil in Yuan (or the Chinese Petro-Yuan it wants to create) and then tells these countries, especially industrial powerhouses and energy poor Japan and South Korea that it will allow the passage of oil as long as they purchase the oil in Yuan?

Russia is already trying to get India to pay it for its oil in Yuan, to some success. Adding economies the size of Japan and South Korea would mean that any country that wants to buy oil could buy it in Yuan instead of Dollars. Once in Yuan, these countries would need to use the Yuan to buy Chinese products, deposit cash there and buy Chinese treasury bills. If China were to combine that with demands that all chips made in Taiwan also be sold in Yuan, the U.S Dollar would suddenly and forcefully no longer be the only reserve currency in the world.

Obviously, the way to stop this from happening is by stating outright that the United States will not tolerate a Chinese takeover of Taiwan. It is true, that the Strategy claims that the US “will also maintain our longstanding declaratory policy on Taiwan, meaning that the United States does not support any unilateral change to the status quo in the Taiwan Strait” but in practice the administration has criticized Japan’s tough talk on China instead of leaving it be. A strong silence on Prime Minister Takaichi’s remarks on China would have served the purpose of keeping the status quo more than telling her to tone down her rhetoric. There is a strong “no intervention ever” strain in the country and the President must make the case that that is not an option if the United States wants to maintain its leadership position, way of life and general prosperity.

In short, the threat to the Dollar as the reserve currency heads right through Taiwan. For those who think that the investment the U.S makes in keeping the Dollar where it is, is too expensive, just think of going on vacation and having the change to Yuan before you leave the country, wondering how much to change because of currency fluctuation and how much fun it is to return with hundreds of dollars in banknotes that you can’t use. Imagine your credit card bill on such travels and wondering how you went 15% over budget but didn’t get anything extra for it. Now imagine the national economy working that way.

Disclaimer: the views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of the author, and not necessarily the opinions reflected by angrymetatraders.com or its associated parties.

You can follow Ira Slomowitz via The Angry Demagogue on Substack https://iraslomowitz.substack.com/ 

postN71

India Insider: The 8.2% Growth Mirage Needs a Reality Check

India Insider: The 8.2% Growth Mirage Needs a Reality Check

India is celebrating the 8.2% real GDP growth result for Q2 FY26, as if it has entered a new economic orbit. Politicians are claiming victory and media is packaging optimism. The narrative is simple: India cannot be stopped. But once we move beyond the headline, the number loses credibility. It rests on a broken deflator, a statistical gap that no one can trace, and data architecture that doesn’t consider half the economy. This is not a story of unstoppable growth. This is a story of statistical convenience.

The Production–Expenditure Divide

On the production side, the numbers look heroic. Manufacturing allegedly grew 9.1%, and financial and professional services posted more than 10% growth. Corporate India looks like it is flying. But when the same activity is measured from the expenditure side – who actually spends this income – the story weakens.

Private consumption at 7.9% is respectable, not outstanding. The real shock is government consumption, which contracted by 2.7%. A shrinking government should normally mute growth, not accelerate it. Yet the GDP shoots up. How does that make sense? It doesn’t unless the number is being propped up somewhere else – and this is the case.

₹1.63 Lakh Crore of ‘Unknown Growth’

GDP includes a category called ‘discrepancy’. It exists because the two methods – production and expenditure – never perfectly align. The discrepancy stands at ₹1.63 lakh crore ($18.2 Billion USD) which equates into roughly 3.3% of real GDP. That means a chunk of this 8.2% growth has no identifiable spender: No households. No firms. No government.

It is income without absorption. A statistical plug. When a number this large is called ‘discrepancy’, the headline becomes unreliable – suspicious. You cannot claim world beating growth when your own data admits it cannot explain where that growth came from.

Chart via the National Statistical Office

The Deflator Illusion

The next distortion is the nominal vs real GDP gap. Nominal GDP is growing at 8.7% and real GDP at 8.2%. A gap of 0.5 percentage points implies inflation has almost vanished. Every Indian knows this is not true. Costs did not collapse. Food inflation has not disappeared.

The explanation is mechanical: India still uses the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) to deflate nominal output. Global commodity prices fell, WPI softened sharply, and that flattening pushed up the real number. In other words, GDP grew because the denominator fell, not because production surged.

This creates a fiscal problem. The Union Budget assumed 10.1% nominal growth. At 8.7%, tax buoyancy will weaken, deficit targets become more difficult, and next year’s fiscal capability shrinks. Real GDP does not pay the bills, Nominal GDP does.

The Informal Blind Spot

India still cannot measure its informal economy accurately. Nearly half of GDP and employment sits outside the formal system, yet the NSO uses formal sector proxies such as corporate balance sheets, GST data, and financial flows to estimate the rest of the economy. If a small business collapses and a corporate giant expands, the data shows a net gain, erasing distress at the bottom which means real economic circumstances are not portrayed accurately for Indian citizens.

Agriculture grew at 3.5%, but it still supports 46% of India’s workforce. That means growth is concentrated in capital intensive and balance-sheet heavy sectors, not into areas that put cash into rural hands. A booming Nifty Index via the stock market does not translate into household prosperity.

An Economy Measured with Old Tools

India continues to measure GDP using a 2011–12 base year, an era before UPI (Unified Payments Interface), before fintech credit, before e-commerce, before gig workforces, before the pandemic rewired supply chains and consumption patterns. India is living in a digital economy, but measuring activity with analog instruments.

A shift to a 2022–23 base year, plus replacing WPI with a Producer Price Index, may finally align the numbers realistically. But until then, headlines are running ahead of bona-fide measurements.

India’s 8.2% print is impressive, but growth estimates that don’t reflect grounded realities produce illusionary optics rather than useful insights. For India to strengthen fiscal and economic credibility, measurements must capture households, labor markets, and productivity, not solely corporate outputs. Policy cannot be shaped by statistical ambiguity, it requires transparency and trusted data.

post315

India Insider: Why a Deep Corporate Bond Market is Needed

India Insider: Why a Deep Corporate Bond Market is Needed

India’s corporate bond market remains small relative to the size and ambitions of its economy. This is often described as a regulatory shortcoming. In reality, it reflects a deeper structural choice: India’s financial system was built to channel savings through banks, not markets. That choice now imposes visible constraints on capital formation, governance, and risk pricing.

During the Covid-19 pandemic, several Indian companies including firms such as Arvind Fashions were forced to raise capital by diluting their equity in public markets. Equity issuance is not inherently wrong, especially during a crisis. However, businesses built on consumer brands, distribution networks, and long gestation cycles require patient, long term capital. Financing such models primarily through short term bank loans or repeated equity dilution creates a mismatch between the nature of the business and the nature of the capital supporting it.

India Corporate Bond Comparison to the U.S 2024-25 Approximated Totals

In countries like the U.S, this gap is filled by intermediate forms of capital. Private equity firms often provide long duration funding through instruments such as mezzanine debt, while deep corporate bond markets allow companies to raise long term money aligned with their operating horizons. In India, the absence of such markets make corporate choose to either raise capital via short term debt that strains cash flows or equity dilution at unfavorable points in the cycle.

A corporate bond market also serves a broader purpose: governance and accountability. A Parliamentary Standing Committee report in 2022 noted that nearly ₹10 lakh crore ($110 Billion USD) of corporate bank loans were written off over the preceding five years. While write-offs do not automatically imply wrongdoing, they highlight a system in which credit losses are repeatedly absorbed by public sector balance sheets where the capital is often infused by taxpayers money. In bank dominated systems, credit assessment is periodic and opaque. Market discipline remains weak.

Traded securities impose a different standard. Michael Milken once observed that bond markets re-evaluate credit daily, not every six months. Prices respond immediately to new information. If sellers suddenly outnumber buyers, the market forces a reassessment of risk in real time. In effect, every trading day becomes a fresh credit decision.

This discipline is missing when loans remain locked within banks. A vibrant corporate bond market which is supported by securitization, secondary-market liquidity, and institutional investors would allow credit risk to be priced, transferred, and monitored continuously. It would expose stress early, rather than after losses have already been socialized.

Today, banks account for nearly 70 percent of financial intermediation in India. Fintech has begun to challenge this dominance, but largely in consumer and personal finance. For corporate and MSME (Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises) financing, long-term capital cannot come from apps or short duration loans, it must come from markets designed to price risk over time.

India’s corporate bond market will not look like America’s, nor does it need to. But without deeper liquidity, institutional participation, and price discovery, India will continue to build long term businesses on short-term money ,and bear the consequences when cycles turn.

(Notes: 1 USD = 90.58)

postre2

Fed Today, Tmrw and Mid-Term with Changing of Guard

Fed Today, Tmrw and Mid-Term with Changing of Guard

The Federal Reserve will cut its Federal Funds Rate by 25 basis points in a handful of hours, that is unless they want to cause a major selling attack on Wall Street and pandemonium in Forex and gold. The Fed which spoke about uncertainty in last month’s FOMC Statement and utterly refused to give guidance about today’s decision, has had the ignition regarding an interest rate cut delivered with nearly 100% certainty because inflation for the moment remains tame.

U.S Dollar Index One Year Chart as of 12th December 2025

Fed Chairman Jerome Powell will leave the Fed in May of 2026. This isn’t a subjective opinion, he is leaving because he is not going to be reappointed by the White House. President Trump has made it clear he wants a lower interest rate and that he believes the Fed has failed to be proactive. Given Trump’s propensity for saying outlandish things, he is not wrong about Powell’s overtly cautious posture. The Fed could have cut the Federal Funds Rate in the early summer and refused to initiate.

Financial institutions have factored the 25 basis point interest rate cut into Forex already. Again, unless if for some reason they want to initiate a massive selloff in the equity indices and cause the 10 Year Treasuries yields to rise like a wildfire, the Fed needs to cut today. Day traders need to understand the first couple of reactions following the FOMC Statement tonight should not be wagered upon without deep pockets and steel stomachs.

There are three more FOMC meetings scheduled for the Fed after today’s decision while Fed Chairman Jerome Powell remains in office. The 28th of January, the 18th of March and 29th of April are the listed FOMC Statement announcement dates, this before the June meeting which Jerome Powell will not helm. While some analysts strongly believe the Fed will find it difficult to cut interest rates early in 2026, the potential for a shift in sentiment and open disagreement regarding the Federal Funds Rate could turn intriguing in late January. If inflation remains steady via the Core PCE Price Index it would not be a shock to see another interest rate cut next month.

Caution has prevailed in Forex the past couple of months. Major currencies like the EUR and GBP have lingered within known ranges. Yes, the JPY has incrementally lost value due to BoJ policy. President Trump cannot make the Fed decide what to do, but he can certainly keep appointing folks who agree with his policies and approach to enterprise. If Powell does not outright say an interest rate cut is impossible for next month’s FOMC decision, U.S economic data that will be generated over the next handful of weeks could deliver enough impetus. Let’s keep in mind ladies and gentlemen that holiday trading will come into full force after next week’s price action.

The Fed’s borrowing rate essentially stands at 4.00% for the moment. After today’s rate decision the Fed Fund Rate should be at 3.75%. And for the moment there is little justification to not make the borrowing rate 3.50% in late January. As economic data presents itself now via the PCE Price index and CPI and PPI statistics, there is reason to believe a more proactive Fed is on the horizon as the pressure is turned up on Jerome Powell.

Perhaps nothing will happen in January, but if inflation remains tame not only will Jerome Powell be criticized by the White House, but he may also face a rather public debate from Fed members who do not agree with his cautious approach to interest rate policy. A weaker USD in Forex against many major currencies mid-term appears to be a real possibility. The ability of the EUR/USD to linger within a cautious middling range may be an indicator that financial institutions have built a mechanism which will allow them to become stronger buyers. Dangerous as it is to predict a timetable, the EUR/USD over 1.17000 would not be a surprise in the weeks to come – at least to me. Let’s see where behavioral sentiment takes us.

postre1

India Insider: Why Russian Oil Should Be Treated Skeptically

India Insider: Why Russian Oil Should Be Treated Skeptically

As Russian President Vladimir Putin arrives in New Delhi for a bilateral summit, the mood in India’s capital is one of profound strategic tension. The core of the problem is India’s massive appetite for discounted Russian Crude Oil, which has shielded the economy from high energy prices but is now causing significant financial and geopolitical risks. This move comes at a time when India’s most important trade surpluses lies with the West, raising anxieties about U.S sanctions and shrinking strategic space.

Trapped Rupee Problem

Since the Ukraine war, Russia’s share of India’s Crude Oil imports has surged from under 2% to nearly 40%. This has simultaneously inflated India’s trade deficit with Russia to nearly $59 billion.

The transactions are largely settled in Indian Rupees (INR). Moscow has accumulated billions of Rupees in Indian banks. However, because the Rupee is not fully convertible on the global market, Russia has very limited ways to use this huge surplus within India. These billions of Rupees are essentially ‘trapped liquidity’ – a problem neither country can easily solve.

India – Russia Bilateral Merchandise Trade Chart from 2017 – 2024

The Kremlin, meanwhile, is shifting its financial allegiance. It is preparing to issue Yuan denominated sovereign bonds, a decisive step that deepens its reliance on Beijing’s financial system amid a cut off from the Western financial system. This financial trajectory clearly signals the next logical step: Russia will inevitably demand that India begin paying for its oil shipments in Chinese Yuan (CNY).

Structural Risk of Holding Chinese Yuan

India has never been comfortable holding Chinese Yuan or settling trades in the currency. That’s partly strategic as New Delhi wants to protect its geopolitical autonomy and position itself as the democratic anchor of the Global South while staying closely aligned with the West.

But Russia’s financial plumbing is now increasingly routed through China. As the Kremlin becomes more deeply integrated into China’s banking and payments system, its dependence on the Yuan becomes structural. Moscow needs Yuan not only to service Chinese creditors, but also to pay for its expanding list of manufactured imports from China. The Ruble, being a largely non-convertible currency, simply cannot support this scale of trade.

For now, Russia-China trade is balanced enough because Beijing still buys large quantities of Russian energy. But this equilibrium can shift quickly. As the Ukraine war drags on and Moscow’s defense spending rises, the Kremlin will be forced to rely even more heavily on Chinese financing, Chinese goods, and ultimately the Yuan itself, tightening its economic dependency on Beijing.

When that moment arrives, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) will be forced to accumulate Yuan as part of its Forex reserves to ensure the continued flow of oil. This decision, born of necessity, introduces a structural vulnerability into India’s financial system as the adoption of Yuan as a reserve currency subject to China’s capital controls.

Risks of Holding the Yuan

China may have both the onshore (CNY) and offshore (CNH) Yuan, but the currency is ultimately controlled by the PBOC, which makes it a risky reserve asset for India. In a crisis, Beijing’s capital controls could restrict liquidity and prevent the RBI from freely converting yuan into hard currency like the USD, effectively trapping India’s capital.

Beyond this financial rigidity, large Yuan holdings also expose India to CCP driven political risk, tying its external stability to China’s domestic decisions. And unlike the Dollar which can be deployed anywhere, Yuan reserves are usable mainly for transactions with China or countries in its financial orbit, sharply limiting India’s strategic and financial flexibility.

Strategic Win for Beijing

For Beijing, this shift delivers a double strategic win, cementing the Yuan as the dominant settlement currency across Eurasia especially among countries squeezed by Western sanctions and it allows the yuan to slip into India’s financial system indirectly, not through Chinese pressure but through Russia’s growing dependence on Chinese finance and India’s reliance on discounted Russian oil.

For Moscow, this is a reluctant compromise: giving up some monetary autonomy in exchange for necessary financial support from China.

For India, however, it introduces a new long term structural risk with a slow but steady Yuan encroachment into its trade and reserve system, operating alongside the dominant U.S Dollar. The oil corridor that was meant to offer an independent strategic opportunity for India is now becoming a channel which Beijing can strengthen its monetary footprint. In this complex triangle, India risks paying a dangerous tactical long-term price for its energy security.

post310

Digesting Holiday and Markets to Come as Fed Looms Next Week

Digesting Holiday and Markets to Come as Fed Looms Next Week

Day traders trying to gauge markets may be feeling a bit of angst for the moment. Always wanting to participate when record highs are being made in the stock markets, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 remain under their respective apexes from late October and early November. Though the markets have produced gains recently, they have not come particularly easily for those who like to ride momentum waves. As always timeframes matter, it is often easier to make mistakes and be impatient when short-term wagers factor into decision making.

S&P 500 Index Six Month Chart as of 2nd December 2025

Gold has done well the past couple of weeks, regaining its upwards traction, but also remains under its apex values. The Federal Reserve will release its FOMC interest rate decision on the 10th of December, and this is what many in the markets may be waiting for in order to make their last big bets for the year per speculative plays.

The Forex market like equities and commodities continue to provide choppy behavior. The ISM Manufacturing numbers from the U.S came in below expectations yesterday. Retail Sales data and Consumer Confidence numbers last week from the States came in below expectations too. There will be jobs statistics via the ADP report on Wednesday and an ISM Services figure. Thursday will see U.S weekly Unemployment Claims. Friday will provide a rather interesting clue for Forex traders and likely influence bond yields when the Core PCE Price Index reading is provided – which the Federal Reserve pays quite a bit of attention regarding their interest rate decisions. The Consumer Sentiment Preliminary University of Michigan data will also be seen on Friday.

As Tuesday starts, day traders should also beware that full market volumes will emerge, this after last week’s Thanksgiving holiday in the States and perhaps a slow return to offices yesterday. The markets will provide plenty of action over the next couple of weeks, before the inevitable Christmas and New Year’s trading doldrums begin.