SP500 20261002

All Quiet on the Trump Front?

by with No Comment Behavioral SentimentCommoditiesEconomic CalendarEconomyEquitiesExclusive ContentFeatured HighlightsFederal Reserve, Interest RatesForexInvestingMajor Global Equity IndicesRisk ManagementRobert PetrucciSpeculatorsUncategorizedWorld

Biased Information Extends to Economic Reporting as Much as It Does To Global Affairs

Nearly one month from now, on the 3rd of November, the U.S mid-term elections will be held. Today the Non-Farm Employment Change date will be published. But will these economic numbers matter? The coverage of the Trump presidency remains problematic no matter what your political beliefs are because it is difficult to know the truth regarding details being reported, particularly as the vote approaches and folks want to influence your decisions.

Depending on which media source you are paying attention to and what the outcome is you are certain to be spoon-fed a large amount of bias. The problem for voters in one month, and for investors today is that a lot of the information and opinions being consumed cannot and should not be trusted. Everyone has bias, to not admit this is not honest. AngryMetaTraders tries to give a solid centrist reasoning of the speculative and investing world based on – truth must win out. However, certainly I and our other writers within AMT have insights that are based on our unique perspectives. 

Reality is important: A case in point is the Fly Dubai terror incident which occurred two days ago. Media outlets are depicting the events in a myriad of ways. Clearly the co-pilot tried to kill the 1st pilot, this so the plane could be be crashed into the ground over the Middle East on its way to Tel Aviv – or possibly be flown into a building. The nosedive of the plane which equated into roughly 5,000 meters in about one minute’s time was only stopped because of the heroic actions by the Indian 1st pilot, and by an Israeli passenger who grabbed the control wheel and leveled off the plane during the confrontation in the cockpit as others also intervened to avert a tragic disaster.

What does this have to do with economics and the markets? Many media sources did not report the events transparently, nor did they provide details on the actual attack. In other words they showed bias.

SP500 20261002

S&P 500 One Year Chart as of 2nd October 2026

The reason this is important is because like the incident in the Middle East in which a plane flying from the United Arab Emirates to Israel received a variety of different reporting, economic news receives the same type of bias. How can you trust a media source that doesn’t want to be transparent about outcomes? Now while it may be simply a lack of known details and an attempt to get a story reported on quickly to beat competitors, it would be foolhardy to say bias wasn’t a culprit in many instances.

As a consumer of news, speculators and investors need to be aware they are looking at information that often is being presented with details that the source wants to convey, while possible omitting facts. Unfortunately, global markets are being confronted by a complex amount of circumstances which include interpretation by the media which is reporting and this can lead to bad trading decisions. 

The war (conflict) with Iran continues to traverse a fragile  and unresolved path. Higher energy costs remain. WTI Crude Oil as of this moment is trading near $92.00. Gold is around $4,180.00. President Trump seemingly is attempting to practice relative calm – within his frequently loud characteristics – and not escalate the Middle East saga until the mid-term elections are complete. Perhaps that is merely my own bias as an observer.

Today Non-Farm Employment Change numbers will be published. And getting back to the original paragraph and its question, will the data matter and how will it be presented. Bias is apparent in most publications that cover the economy, to deny this would be a mistake by investors and speculators. 

While it is likely the jobs numbers are not going to have a significant impact on the voting decisions, nor the trading choices by market participants, what matters is the fact that the presentation is being geared towards an audience depending on bias of the source. The Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, CNBC all have reporters who certainly have their own perceptions and beliefs. There is nothing wrong with this, but as a consumer of news and as a market participant you must understand that you are being influenced intentionally by media sources. 

The results from Wall Street the past handful of months have seen plenty of trading opportunities. Yet, there is a loud debate on what the near and mid-term will produce. Plenty of risk analysts are nervous about their forecasts. Yet, even soothsayers need to be aware and remind themselves they are being influenced (including myself) by the news they are consuming.

There are facts. Market results are a truth. Higher U.S Treasury yields are a reality, the stronger USD in recent weeks is happening. Sideways results – via a handful amount of months – in the SP 500, Nasdaq 100 and Dow 30 are facts – but importantly too is they remain within sight of apex highs. But the market results and their storylines are determined by media depending on how they would like you to interpret the results.

As an investor or speculator you must know your own timeframes and what your ambitions are regarding targets. Is there an AI bubble, can AI make enough revenues to cover existing valuations? Market results are delivering real values, but they still need to be interpreted and with open and flexible perspectives to determine what might happen near and mid-term.

Be careful folks. Understand what you are looking at is in fact meant to make you feel a certain way, you must digest the information and manner it is being conveyed the same way you treat a meal depending on what you have eaten. Some of the information you are taking in is junk food. You need to be able to decide on your own – hopefully with reliable insights and information – on what trading and investment paths you want to pursue.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

AMT Top 10

AMT Top Ten Miscellaneous Insights, Mischief and Concerns for the 22nd of September

by with No Comment AMT Top TenArtificial IntelligenceCentral BanksCommoditiesEconomyEquitiesFeatured HighlightsFederal Reserve, Interest RatesFinancial InstitutionsForexInvestingMajor Global Equity IndicesRisk ManagementUncategorizedWorld

Trump's Saga, Market Conditions, Saudi Arabia, Investor Outlooks and More

10. Naima: John Coltrane’s classic composition from the late 1950’s should be listened to intently with eyes closed as his harmony and provocative ability to create a devotional hymn enchants. What do you hear? Instead of playing music for mere mortals, it sounds as if Coltrane is orchestrating for gods – take a moment to listen.

9. Upwards: Bitcoin, cough, cough is again making some look foolish as it traverses higher. As of this moment, BTC/USD is at $86,000 and making doubters – among them some AMT staff – shake their heads in disbelief (disdain). Michael Saylor’s Strategy/MicroStrategy entities have MSTR share prices around $168.00 per yesterday’s close. This is occurring as AI concerns because of its ability to challenge cybersecurity and coding of crypto remains relevant. Additionally, higher energy costs are causing miners to wince, running out of folks who are willing to speculate in the domain remains a danger (because of Ponzi suspicions), notions about government supervision getting stronger instead of becoming more lax, quantum technology, and known rogue nations keeping Bitcoin and other cryptos vibrant to hide illicit money shadow. But this is nothing to worry about it appears for Bitcoin believers and influencers.

AMT Top 10

AMT Top 10 Miscellaneous Insights, Mischief and Concerns for the 22nd of September

8. Unheralded Victories: While many were looking away purposely and likely do not want to give President Trump applause, Denmark extended the U.S administration not only an olive branch regarding Greenland, but perhaps a signal that they have acquiesced by expanding U.S security jurisdiction. From a foreign policy perspective the Trump administration has changed the Venezuela leadership, secured greater military capabilities in Greenland, and remains focused on bringing Cuba’s leadership to their knees as the island nation suffers from extended electrical outages.

7. Berkshire Hathaway: Warren Buffet stepped away from his job as Chairman on the 18th of September and named his son as successor. Share values via BRK.A were above $800,000 in April and March of 2025. This August BRK was again over $800,000. Yesterday’s close was near $752,000. Warren Buffet’s brand and era is coming to a close and the new leadership will be hard pressed to fill the confidence void. Berkshire Hathaway investors however, are some of the most loyal constituents in the marketplace. They will want to see a steady ship run by Howard Buffet and CEO Greg Abel.

6. New School: What will the Fed do now that they have raised the Federal Funds Rate by a quarter of a basis point on the 16th of September? Kevin Warsh has proven he is not exactly in the coat pocket of President Trump. After the Fed’s unanimous vote last week to raise rates, what happens on the 28th of October? Via Forex it appears financial institutions have braced their outlooks for another hike sometime later this year, but are they correct? Old theories via central banking to attack inflation with higher interest rates is a standard practice, but the escalating costs via higher energy prices has nothing to do with a sudden emergence of pent up demand, it is a supply shock that has caused more expensive WTI Crude Oil – not one driven by an increase in desire. Will Warsh prove he is new-school and proactively fight for lower interest rates sooner rather than later? Higher interest rates will not stop the Middle East saga from remaining an economic influence and spectacle.

5. Bank of Japan: Like the Fed the BoJ is not in a particularly safe space. After following in the footsteps of the Federal Reserve last week, the interest rate hike of 0.25% by the BoJ was viewed as a rather lackluster move from financial institutions and Forex players who seemingly wanted an increase of at least 0.50%. The USD/JPY remains a volatile speculative wager and is above 156.850 – give or take the tantrums and punishment inflicted from the FX market. The Bank of Japan has only had 3+ decades of questionable policy, here’s to another decade worth of doubts and consistent critical observations from outsiders.

4. Hear No Trump: The U.S President is entering a dangerous political phase for his legacy and risks losing his grip on power. Mid-term elections are rapidly drawing closer and the White House could lose its Republican led majority of the House. The President is starting to be viewed as a lame-duck by some observers. Trump who is known for his ability to change his rhetorical stances and policies quickly is still at the epi-center of global affairs. The question is if other policy makers and nations are listening. The Republican party is entering a dangerous phase and its leadership is likely going to endure a rather loud fight for control as factions take sides. The Vance and Rubio camps are likely to grow louder and divergent.

3. Saudi Arabia: Ask a friend to point to Yemen on a map, can they do this correctly? The Houthis of Yemen and Saudi Arabia may feel like a world away from known geographies, but what is happening in the wake of attacks on port areas and islands in the Red Sea (and even Riyadh) is significant. Crude Oil production and shipping problems suffered because of pipeline vulnerability is a vital concern for energy supply to Europe and Asia. While large investors may feel like they have digested the dangers, Iran and its proxies – including the Houthis may have additional theater to present. WTI Crude Oil has come down in price since yesterday but remains volatile and is around $93.00. Will optimistic banter continue?

2. FOMO: The Nasdaq 100, S&P 500, Dow 30 and their global counterparts are within their higher apexes as traders and financial institutions keep placing their money into these known asset spheres. The bond market is still producing high yields and folks are seemingly letting their casino like bets ride on a wheel they hope propels solid momentum for as long as possible. But alas, number 1, should make people pause:

1. Bandages: Perhaps our circle of contacts is too small, but behavioral sentiment is not exactly robust regarding positive market outlooks via mid-term queries. Concerns about equity indices, bond yields, inflation (because of sticky energy costs) and the general malaise that is hovering over the broad markets is not appealing. It feels as if sutures are keeping wounds from becoming infected in a haphazard manner. Investors are cautious and appear ready for the Band-Aid to be ripped off. The late ’90s and early 2000s dot.com bubble bursting, the 2006 bank and housing whispers and rumors flotilla which turned into the catastrophe of 2007-08 feel oddly similar. Perhaps it is a good time for accumulation if nothing seriously bad takes place in the markets. Circumstances feel as if a wave of blind market powers may harm those who seek never ending profits with a tsunami of losses. Perhaps it is a good time to be a speculator.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

Share:
10Y Treasury Yields 20260916

Fed Decision: Two Sides of a Dangerous Coin

by with No Comment AssetsBehavioral SentimentCentral BanksCommoditiesEconomyEquitiesFeatured HighlightsFederal Reserve, Interest RatesFinancial InstitutionsForexIndiaInvestingRisk ManagementSpeculatorsUncategorizedWorld

The Fed Should Not Raise Rates But It Will

What and who you believe will play an important part in today’s market for speculators. While investors who are looking at long-term prisms can comfortably wait on the decision from the Fed’s FOMC regarding interest rates later today, retail traders who are trying to profit on near-term wagers via momentum and are seeking to gain an advantage by knowing which way the wind is blowing have a difficult task ahead. Via results in the Forex market it appears many financial institutions have braced already for an interest rate hike of a quarter basis point.

However, what if the financial institutions and many analysts are wrong? What if Fed Chair Kevin Warsh and other FOMC voting members believe the White House and think that inflation will erode as price pressures ease when there is a remedy to the Iranian conflict. That would mean that they could debate with other Fed officials for no interest rate hike. Because if the Fed were to raise interest rates later today, thus making borrowing costlier for businesses and consumers – and potentially putting more strain on the U.S debt payments because of increasing Treasury yields, it would still not solve the higher costs of energy. (There is an argument below which negates this possible yield problem and one that is likely to be heard from some economists).

10Y Treasury Yields 20260916

U.S 10-Y Treasury Yields Five Year Chart as of 16th September 2026

Yes, there is demand for fuel globally, but the demand for energy is not going to decrease because the U.S Federal Reserve may raise interest rates. In fact, it could make costs more expensive for businesses who are likely burning money via increased credit lines already created, this to transact their currently higher costs to guarantee effective supply of fuel to fund their logistics and manufacturing which they had not planned for while making their initial 2026 budget estimates prior to the Iranian war. In other words, a higher Federal Funds Rate will equate into higher costs for businesses.

$100.00+ WTI Crude Oil is Not A Friend

Per the other side of the coin, WTI Crude Oil has turned more expensive and volatile since March of this year. For a moment it looked like relief would be delivered via the supposed MoU between Iran and the U.S. WTI Crude Oil went below $80.00 periodically when optimism was peaked by White House rhetoric and calm waters in the Hormuz Strait were reported. Hopes for a return to WTI Crude Oil below $70.00 were viewed as legitimate.

However, the tranquility sought has vanished in the past couple of weeks and has grown more anxious as Saudi Arabia has become an important actor in the Middle East conflict as the Houthis and Iraqi militias cause havoc for the Saudi Arabian government. The price of WTI Crude Oil is now stubbornly above $100.00 and rumors about how Saudi Arabia is dealing with its own military confrontation and the way it is able to supply its own Crude Oil are confounding.

Which brings us back to the initial question regarding the Federal Reserve and Kevin Warsh, who will the Fed Chair listen to? Does he and other voting members of the FOMC believe there will be a quick fix to what has become stubbornly higher costs for WTI Crude Oil which is creating inflation? Or do they now have to objectively consider what may have been perceived as a temporary blip of elevated expenditures for the U.S economy as a potentially long-term problem? If Warsh and his cohorts believe the Iranian situation is going to find a remedy within the next four to five months, they should NOT raise interest rates today.

Again, while higher fuels costs are problematic, raising interest rates is not going to lower demand for WTI Crude Oil which is the chief instigator of higher inflation globally. It is not a question of who believes President Trump’s tantrums, it is a question concerning viability of a real end game to the Iranian situation. Plenty of Crude Oil exists, its production capabilities are strong, it is Middle East supply to Asia, Europe and Africa that is causing a problem and the higher cash and futures pricing for WTI Crude Oil. Thus, the lynchpin remains Iran. If their government capitulates and bends a knee, opening up the Hormuz Strait and stops plying its influence on the Houthis of Yemen and other militia groups in Iraq that are now causing problems for Saudi Arabia the price of WTI Crude Oil will drop dramatically.

If the situation is not rectified and the price of WTI Crude Oil remains elevated and Saudi Arabia doesn’t handle their confrontation which is turning increasingly militaristic, then it will not solve a higher interest rate initiative from the U.S Federal Reserve – unless the Fed is merely looking to decrease Treasury yields by increasing global demand for the bonds – thus hoping to increase their desirability.

Old School vs. New School 

Today’s decision from the Fed comes down to old text books and failed central bank policies versus new economic considerations. An interest rate hike from the Fed may actually make circumstance more difficult for governments around the world trying to balance their own books. 

For instance, higher yields on U.S debt are causing problems in India where some investors are shedding Indian Rupee assets and seeking the high yielding U.S Treasuries not only because of a ‘guaranteed’ bond yield, but the fact that their assets are stored in USD which is likely going to remain stronger than the INR over the next few years if a historical track record is looked upon. This is a saga that will play out in other emerging market nations too as financial institutions chase ‘secure’ profits.

5 is a Dangerous Number

So not only does the Fed face a problem regarding an interest rate hike that will not solve inflation problems caused by a war that is effecting prices because there is a fear of supply logistics, but there could be a knock-on effect regarding debt. U.S 10-Y Treasury yields near and above 5% is a clear warning side that investors are uncomfortable, this no mere speculative gain achieved by bond vigilantes. 

Another point, if the Fed were to raise interest rates today, it could in theory cause greater demand for U.S Treasuries from abroad and thus lower the Treasury yields for the moment – thus making the argument for a higher interest rate more dignified for those who want to raise rates. However, if the Fed were to say no to interest rate increases for now and point to a belief the U.S conflict with Iran is going to conclude sooner rather than later and said the U.S economy faces distress because of the higher fuels costs alone, this could also solve confidence problems.

U.S debt stands above 40 USD trillion, lower yields are a desire, but lower borrowing costs for businesses and consumers are wanted too. So what will the Fed do today………..drumroll please…………the Fed will raise interest rates – making a mistake. And will show it fears a long-term risk scenario between Iran and the U.S and problems for Saudi Arabia. The USD will see plenty of volatility. Confidence will not be shown by the Federal Reserve today and this will be problematic.

Stage presence from Fed Chair Kevin Warsh is going to be extremely important today. He has failed in his previous two FOMC Press Conferences to look confident while speaking and answering questions. His speech at Jackson Hole in late August also proved lackluster.

And this is where is gets more dangerous for Warsh and the U.S White House, because of President Trump’s ability to change his tactics quickly – there is a lack of confidence among investors who are trying to gauge their outlooks for the mid-term and beyond.

Kevin Warsh will find it difficult to pull a rabbit out of a hat. Many folks will walk away disgruntled if an interest rate is introduced and no clear guideline is mentioned regarding what is next regarding other potential rate hikes – or a plan to actually lower the Federal Funds Rate. The U.S economy while strong could easily be sent into a recession with an interest rate hike and sustained higher WTI Crude Oil costs. 

Behavioral sentiment is going to remain on a toxic tightrope unless confidence is delivered. While individual perceptions about what should be done are important, understanding the mindset of the U.S Federal Reserve is crucial. Eliminating our own personal beliefs and bias from trading decisions and acting on what realities may be demonstrated are vital to profit. 

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

Share:
Singapore Dollar 20260911

Conflicted Trading: Singapore Dollar and Federal Reserve Considerations

by with No Comment Behavioral SentimentCommoditiesEconomyEquitiesExclusive ContentFeatured HighlightsFederal Reserve, Interest RatesFinancial InstitutionsForexIndiaRisk ManagementRobert PetrucciSpeculatorsUncategorizedWorld

USD/SGD: Conflicting Desires From the Federal Reserve and Financial Institutions

The world of Forex is about to grow murkier in the coming days as shadows loom over financial institutions regarding their near-term decisions as they try to gain clarity regarding what appears to be confused and concerning mid-term outlooks for speculators and investors.

The USD/SGD is traversing near the 1.26776 vicinity as of this writing. The currency pair is trading within a long-term historical lower realm in which the 1.26000 level was challenged from mid-January until the first week of this year. This past Wednesday the USD/SGD traded near the 1.26280 mark. Previous to the current ratios and lows seen in early 2026, the Singapore Dollar traded around the 1.24475 level in June of 2014. The USD/SGD challenged 1.20000 level in early August of 2011 – yes, 25 years ago.

Singapore Dollar 20260911

USD/SGD One Year Chart as of 11th September 2026

Here Come The Risk Events: Inflation, BRICS, Iranian War and the U.S Fed

Now that we have alerted technical traders about the long-term depths of the USD/SGD being flirted upon once again, it needs to be pointed out that a parade of risk events are standing in front of global Forex today and next week. First up today is the U.S Consumer Price Index inflation data. This weekend the 18th BRICS Summit will be conducted in New Delhi, India as geopolitics and trade talks will get plenty of attention. Next Wednesday the U.S Federal Reserve will issue its FOMC Statement and Federal Funds Rate decision – which may produce a climax for theatrical trading in the coming week.

While it feels almost needless to say, the Iranian War has not relented. The price of WTI Crude Oil is around $100.65 per the cash market. The sustained highs achieved in the past couple of days do not show many signs of suddenly relenting. WTI Crude Oil was around $86.50 around the 1st of September, the USD/SGD was near 1.27200. To create a bit more alarm regarding the risk horizon going into this weekend the U.S 10-Y Treasury yields lurk around 4.945%, the 30-Y Bond yields are close to 5.355% – none of this sits well with the U.S White House, nor Treasury. In the midst of this investment noise, the price of Gold is close to $4,345.00, which still looks cheap considering current circumstances.

Crude Oil supplies remain anxious globally and inflation is certainly causing angst for citizens and a variety of government policies. Singapore will report August inflation data on the 23rd of September, July’s inflation data came in around 2%, with energy costs being the culprit for higher prices in many cases. The USD/SGD was near 1.29500 around the 14th of July. Prices for energy have not gone lower and the likelihood of them turning cheaper soon remains unlikely.

USD/SGD Correlations and Current Sentiment

USD centric action since the first week of July has showed weakness against many major currencies including the Singapore Dollar. Let’s put the USD/JPY to the side because of the intervention via the Bank of Japan and input of the U.S Treasury and Federal Reserve collectively. The USD/SGD is correlating to the broad market. Risk averse decisions have been prevalent in stock markets. The U.S major indices while remaining near higher altitudes are showing cautious behavioral sentiment.

The USD/SGD certainly went lower in January and early February of this year, but this occurred as doses of optimism were filling the air and in the absence of the Iranian war. Yet, the downturn in the USD/SGD has been formidable since highs around 1.29900 were seen on the 24th of June. In late November of 2025 the currency pair flirted with the 1.31000 level. 

Federal Reserve and Treasury Battle with Reality

The U.S Treasury and Federal Reserve will not tell the U.S public that the USD loss of value is an invisible tax. Nor does President Trump want Crude Oil prices to remain high because Americans are certain to get angry about more expensive gasoline prices, particularly if they remain elevated after being promised costs will come down. Reality may prove painful for all parties in the coming months.

Which leaves us with the Federal Reserve’s interest rate decision this coming Wednesday and how it decides to decode the current anxious inflation concerns. Will the Fed try to explain that they still believe – due to the U.S intended Iranian war policy and its belief they will win in the coming months – that the Federal Funds Rate remains situated properly at around 3.50-3.75%? Delivering the important question regarding what exactly has been traded into the USD/SGD. Have financial institutions traded an interest rate increase into the currency pair already?

It certainly feels like long-term investors who believe the Federal Reserve will have to raise interest rates to fight against stubborn inflation have refused to buy Treasuries cheaply and thus forced yields upwards the past months. So what does the Federal Reserve do as an ‘independent’ institution knowing that U.S White House and Treasury desires may not match policy coordination? It is the 40+ trillion USD debt question.

Will Fed Chair Kevin Warsh actually dare to raise the current borrowing rates and say that it is quite possible the rate can be lowered again in the mid-term? Or does he admit that as feared by many financial institutions that two to three interest rate hikes will be needed per old school economic thoughts, which may actually make the current circumstances of average Americans much worse with higher borrowing costs created across the board as a side effect?

Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh has not exactly proven efficient while addressing journalists and Fed watchers quite yet. His speech this coming Wednesday on the 16th will be crucial for the broad markets. The USD/SGD is trading within its lower realm, but durable support technically does lurk. Jittery Forex trading awaits for all.

Will the Federal Reserve be bold enough to actually NOT increase the current Federal Funds Rate and talk about the risks to the U.S economy because of potential recession concerns; this as the mid-term elections lurk in November and President Trump watches and doesn’t want talk about a slowdown in the U.S economy heard from what he considers his administration. However, the Fed is independent and can do as it wants in theory.

At this point the Federal Reserve and Treasury should make sure the drama is coordinated because many eyes will be focused on the coming show. And the end result over the near-term will be volatile Forex and a USD/SGD that reacts with price velocity depending on the immediate reactions from financial institutions as they judge the path ahead which will likely remain unclear. 

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

Share:
AMT Top 10

AMT Top Ten Miscellaneous Post-Labor Day Notes and Tantrums

by with No Comment AMT Top TenArtificial IntelligenceAssetsBehavioral SentimentBusinessCentral BanksCommoditiesEconomic CalendarEconomyEquitiesFeatured HighlightsFederal Reserve, Interest RatesFinancial InstitutionsFootballForexInvestingRisk ManagementSpeculatorsUncategorizedWorld

Higher Hopes and False Victories Welcome Nervous Investors Back After the Holiday

10. We Thought You Won – Part One: Apologies to Western Michigan University who had a victory stolen from them on Saturday in Ann Arbor. The Big Ten should not only be embarrassed, but they should be investigated. Big time college football suffered a black eye this past weekend. Folks wondering why WMU is not making a bigger stink regarding the added time and decision to repeat the last play of the game which ultimately cost WMU the contest against the Wolverines, should understand they will not. Because WMU needs to play against the University of Michigan to receive big pay days, which often are hard to find. WMU received 1.5 million USD for the game on Saturday and are scheduled to play against Big Blue again on the 1st of September, 2029.

9. Not Dead Yet: Bitcoin is trading near $78,800. After flirting with lows around the $58,100 vicinity in late June, BTC/USD has created momentum upwards. However, the elevator still can go down. Strategy via MSTR is near $142.00 per share. Michael Saylor survives and influencers are boisterous and breathing a bit easier – for now.

AMT Top 10

AMT Top 10 Miscellaneous Post-Labor Day Notes and Tantrums, 8th of Sept. 2026

8. Bad Brains: Tucker Carlson forayed into another absurd path when his recent guest, Jess Elofson, declared that Algebra is not needed and those who use it are ‘good little goy-slaves’. Carlson averages almost 57 million views to his podcast and social media outlets on a weekly basis.

7. NVDA: Nvidia is priced near $230.00 and the Nasdaq 100 finished Friday’s trading around 29,544. The Nasdaq 100 traded above 30,700 on the 3rd of June. Nvidia’s high touched the $236.00 level in the middle of May. Summer saw choppy reversals in the Nasdaq and S&P and values while elevated have run into cautious headwinds. Now that Labor Day is complete and summer ambivalence will be dusted off, where will the stock markets go? Iran lingers, inflation via higher energy costs looks problematic, mid-term election worries, AI infrastructure expenditures are concerning and bond yields all weigh on investment mindsets. Additional risk events are coming quickly down the road, Consumer Price Index data will be released this Friday and the Fed’s FOMC interest rate decision is next Wednesday on the 16th.

6. Reversal City: The USD/JPY is traversing below the 154.000 mark currently. The Bank of Japan and the U.S Treasury/Fed interaction regarding intervention and rhetoric about protecting the Yen’s value has apparently scared off buyers of the currency pair for the moment. Will bullish speculators now stay away from the USD/JPY for good? Doubtful.

5. Rhetoric Alone: Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh has found it difficult to convince the investment community that his lack of interest rate guidance is a good idea. Instead, the lack of clarity delivered from the Fed has led to higher Treasury yields. While Scott Bessent tried to fight the higher yields a couple of weeks ago, Treasuries are still smoldering and threaten to become a more dangerous fire. Investors and traders want more tangible proof that interest rate and monetary policies are structurally solid.

4. September 11th: This Friday will mark the 25th anniversary of terrorists attacks on the World Trade Center, Pentagon, and plane crash near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. 

3. Upwards: WTI Crude Oil price have shown plenty of nervous behavioral sentiment higher this past week. WTI Crude Oil is now over $94.00 in the cash market. Reports indicate that shipping via the Hormuz Strait has decreased again, this as military escalation appears ready to potentially increase as a reportedly desperate IRGC led Iran and frustrated U.S White House collide.

2. Post-Summer Guillotine: Danger lurks over the global marketplace, this as risk analysts, traders and investors appear to be converging into the same cautious direction. Forex, stock markets, bond yields, and key commodities are flashing bright yellow waring slow signals. Contrarian investors and speculators may be enjoying the current financial landscape. Value plays and volatile trading opportunities may feel appealing, but risk management is going to prove useful.

1. We Thought You Won – Part Two: After saying over the past handful of months that Iran had lost the war and just hadn’t surrendered yet, via Truth Social yesterday President Trump wrote that “when we WIN the war with Iran” that gasoline prices in the U.S would plummet. While observers are used to President Trump’s seemingly infinite capability to utter contradictory statements, yesterday’s appraisal of the current situation in the Middle East may be realistic, but it can also be observed as disquieting. There appears to be more trouble down the road.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

Share:
WTI CrudeOila 20260902

Bad Timing for President Trump May Equal Good Trading Opportunities

by with No Comment AMT MarketsAssetsBehavioral SentimentBusinessEconomyEquitiesExclusive ContentFeatured HighlightsFederal Reserve, Interest RatesFinancial InstitutionsForexInvestingRisk ManagementRobert PetrucciSpeculatorsUncategorizedWorld

You Don't Have to be a Buyer in the Current Marketplace in Order to Profit

There are moments when the markets are calm and then there are these times. It is beginning to look like increasingly bad timing for President Trump and his administration’s hope to keep WTI Crude Oil prices in check and silence the chatter about inflation. 

Instead of a de-escalation based on tranquil conditions in the Middle East, investors were smacked in the face again last night. However, while this may be a bad time to be an investor unless they are looking for value plays, traders may actually have more opportunities in the current market circumstances as long as they manage their risks appropriately.

WTI Crude Oil jumped higher last night and while the commodity has outdone itself since late February regarding price velocity, last night’s performance likely felt volatile even for experienced large players who have solid intel on the ground regarding Middle East shipping and supplies. The energy sector has been more akin to the soft commodities regarding reversals the past handful of months, Coffee, Cocoa and Crude Oil have offered colorful price ranges. But that is not how WTI Crude Oil is supposed to work.

WTI CrudeOila 20260902

WTI Crude Oil 1 Year Chart as of 2 September 2026

Inflation concerns will not go away quietly as long as WTI Crude Oil remains highly valued. Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh may in fact be putting on a show for the public – that he is his own man and can express his concerns regarding inflation no matter what President Trump thinks – when in fact he may simply be laying a framework to work in tandem with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and lower interest rates in order to create less pressure on Treasury yields. However, this planned (or conspiratorial) thinking may be hard to actually produce in reality on the 16th of September when the Fed’s FOMC has to show its cards once again. As long as WTI Crude Oil remains above $90.00, “Houston we have a problem,” murmurs may be heard loud and clear.

If Treasury yields remain tilted upwards because investors are refusing to buy them at cheaper rates, it will start to infect the Nasdaq 100, S&P 500 and the Dow 30 more and create cautionary skirmishes which may produce deeper downsides in stock markets.

Iran wouldn’t want to cause President Trump problems, correct? Why would Iran want higher Crude Oil prices to ensnarl President Trump into a morass of political battles in the U.S and make life difficult for the Republicans during the mid-term elections? Does the IRGC have folks who understand the dynamics of U.S politics? Yes they do and it is a 100% certainty they would like to be a pain in President’s Trump’s aspirations.

We are left to deal with the ever-changing events that seem to be quite good at repeating themselves. Financial institutions are not only nervous about their mid-term outlooks, they are wary about the near-term too. Forex, commodities, bond yields, Wall Street and other global stock markets will struggle to make solid gains until clarity develops.

What will clarity look like? It will be optimistic banter in which rhetoric from different mouths and geographies is actually believed by the adoring crowds. Results do not have to be good, but outcomes need to be able to be forecasted and planned, allowing investors to seek their cash preservation and fortunes in a variety of assets (and show their overseers that they used adequate risk management in case things go wrong). 

Gold has done well recently, although it seems to have hit some resistance lately. However, if inflation tranquility is not achieved and if President Trump’s circumstances grow more dire, the precious metal will continue to offer speculative plays upwards. 

Investors are restless. Making 6 to 8% profits a year looks rather boring after plenty of solid years of upwards traction. Folks aren’t used to powerful financial storms and they forget about lingering troubled periods in which simple profits can prove comforting as broad markets struggle. 

Day trading is dangerous. However, those with solid risk taking tactics and those who aren’t married to the notion that markets only go up, but are willing to bet that markets (assets of many classes) can go lower too – now have an opportunity to test their technical perspectives and understanding of behavioral sentiment. 

Realistic targets using take profits and making sure stop loss protection still allows for a trade to move until goals are met is important when volatility is ripping price realms to shreds. Forex instability appears to be increasing as USD centric attitudes remain convoluted. Does Fed Chair Kevin Warsh have enough power to fight against an interest rate hike on the 16th of September, will the price of WTI Crude Oil cooperate, will President Trump’s wishful thinking about Iran come true? Results may not match what is wanted by the guardians of the marketplace. Contrarians may see the current market and global political situation as a time to seek value and help inflate markets, but they might be spitting into the wind. 

Maybe the AI concerns about infrastructure costs and corporate cash needs are baseless. Perhaps the deficit being created by the U.S and many other nations is simply idle chatter by risk analysts who are too nervous. Maybe there is a secret pill for all of us to become optimistic about all things.

It is a good time for traders to remain realistic and target exaggerated price movements in assets that offer opportunities in distressed offerings. You do not have to buy the marketplace to profit ladies and gentlemen.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

Share:
30 Year Govt Bonds 20260820

Bond Yields: The Wheel Has Not Been Rediscovered

by with No Comment Behavioral SentimentCentral BanksDataEconomyExclusive ContentFeatured HighlightsFederal Reserve, Interest RatesFinancial InstitutionsForexRisk ManagementRobert PetrucciUncategorizedWorld

Unintended Consequences: USD and Gold will now get their turn in the casino because of Scott Bessent's QA

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s decision to begin injecting money into U.S Treasuries needs to be looked at by Forex traders. There is reason to suspect USD centric weakness may prevail moving forward. 

Yesterday’s bond news regarding Bessent’s actions to fight the higher yields in U.S 30-Year Bonds has brought rates down from almost 5.28% to nearly 5.18% as of this morning. 

30 Year Govt Bonds 20260820

U.S 30-Year Bond Yields 5 Day Chart as of 20 August 2026

Perhaps market results and dynamics can be quantified as math within a game, but at the end of the day it is behavioral sentiment that drives market forces and the way financial institutions react. Psychology can be looked at as the reaction via the marketing/influence of policy positions and presentation.

We have been down this road before. The decision to announce a round of quantitative easing yesterday via Treasury/Fed intervention should be compared to what the same team did a couple of weeks ago regarding its powerplay with the Bank of Japan in order to make the JPY stronger. We are now in a definite cycle in which government institutions are battling investors to stop momentum in certain assets when policies have gone bad.

The wheel has not been reinvented. It may seem like an unfair advantage to traders betting against government policies that are interpreted (correctly) as being misguided or unwise, but these are the rules of the game. Large players who have been betting on U.S Treasury yields to increase were likely not happy yesterday, but they should have known the U.S government would not sit idly and simply allow an implosion of the financial system to occur.

Having said the above, now we can look towards the realm of unintended consequences. The U.S Dollar Index dove yesterday with USD centric weakness and gold soared. And as long as folks refuse to buy U.S long-term Treasuries on the cheap and demand higher interest rates to protect their investments the potential of further unintended consequences will occur. 

Scott Bessent handled the situation perhaps correctly yesterday, but he is dealing with symptoms and not the cause of the virus. A lack of clarity clouds global central banks and monetary policies connected to their interest rates. Inflation concerns persists and so does the debate regarding how to battle this illness.

The U.S Fed and Chair Kevin Warsh have a major task ahead regarding interest rate policy.  And government’s – particularly the U.S – have to decide if they can actually stop the bleeding. For the moment this appears to be a tall order because by injecting digital money into U.S long-term bonds the U.S is spending money that it really doesn’t have, except to say that this is a game of chicken in some respects and financial institutions could be faced with the dilemma of cutting off their nose to spite their face. Where are Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman when you need them?

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

Share:
Singapore Dollar 20260818

Forex: Compressed Tight Realms Signaling Nervous Reactions

by with No Comment Behavioral SentimentCentral BanksCommoditiesEconomic CalendarEquitiesFeatured HighlightsFederal Reserve, Interest RatesFinancial InstitutionsForexInvestingRisk ManagementSpeculatorsUncategorized

Sentiment Storms as Financial Institutions Remain Unsure about Outlooks

Price action in the USD/SGD has continued to demonstrate a rather significant turn downwards since the last week of June. The price of the currency pair is near 1.27800 as of this writing and is traversing near values seen the 1st of June and towards the end of the first week of March. Importantly, the USD/SGD has also seen recent lower depths and was below 1.27000 in the second week of May.

The USD/SGD traversed deeper ratios in late January when the 1.26000 vicinity was challenged and these levels were sustained until the middle of February. On the 26th of February the USD/SGD was near the 1.26500 mark. Now that the above numbers have been established, let’s discuss why this is potentially important for Forex traders as developing trends surface.

The past few years of trading have seen a compression of Forex deviations, in other words the FX market has grown more tame. However, the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) now reports that over 9.6 trillion USD in value is traded daily. This is a stark increase compared to 2022 when Forex saw an average daily market around 7.5 trillion – meaning there has been a 28% increase over the past four years.

Singapore Dollar 20260818

USD/SGD One Year Chart as of 18 August 2026

The scope of volume is presented not to cause fear, but to show Forex traders what is at stake and the size of the marketplace and its potential for sudden jolts of volatility if it is established. 

Turning our attention to the new Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh and his preference to not give concrete forward guidance is important. U.S Treasury yields are dangerously high (the 30-Y yield is near 5.31%), and the military conflict between Iran and the U.S  continues to fester. Threats remain on the horizon which need observation, insights that prove correct regarding how these bits of information will influence the Fed Chair and the impact on the USD could prove significant for financial institutions.

Large players have reasons to be critical about a lack of clarity and this might spark more choppiness in Forex – even though value realms are said to be in a compressed state. This opens the door for technical traders who may have a better gauge on existing behavioral sentiment of the Forex markets compared to fundamental traders who have too many tea leaves to interpret which are moving rapidly as the cup gets shifted. Technical traders may have a good sense of where algo trading is directing its velocity per current Forex sentiment. 

While some analysts make a case for an increase to the Federal Funds Rate because of inflation concerns, what happens if they are wrong? And what if large players are now discounting their initial fears regarding higher interest rates and are actually starting to position themselves for the Fed Funds Rate to remain the same or be lowered in the mid-term? Is this one of the reasons why the USD has become weaker recently?

What if the new Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh proves stronger than people believe and has the ability to talk lower interest rates into reality? The U.S Treasury faces a huge and expensive task trying to pay off the yields of the high flying 10-Year and 30-Year bonds. What if Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent who has a solid relationship with Fed Chair Warsh proves influential? Read AMT’s Charles Najjar’s article on his thoughts about why the Fed should aim for a 2% Fund Rate: https://www.angrymetatraders.com/why-the-us-fed-should-lower-interest-rates-to-2/

Yes, the Middle East situation remains troubling from a mid-term economic viewpoint regarding the implications on WTI Crude Oil prices and ancillary energy costs globally. Inflation must be battled, but is raising the Federal Funds Rate going to help decrease the cost of energy or lessen its demand? Mostly likely no.

US Dollar Index 20260818

U.S Dollar Index One Year Chart as of 18 August 2026

The gold market has started to show signs of price velocity the past couple of weeks. The precious metal is trading near $4,395.00 as of this writing. Investors with a long-term window and troubled perspectives about the health of the USD have plenty of reasons to be more comfortable holding gold compared to staying in cash. 

U.S equities have been doing well via indices, but nervous shadows are hovering (maybe they always are). And this is why diversification is always important via long-term investment. Equities, bonds, gold and a small proportion for speculative purposes – this for those who want to try and increase their wealth while maintaining a status quo regarding preservation of wealth.

However, from a speculative standpoint, the Forex market is starting to show signs of alarming behavior, some may even call it a lack of correlation caused by storms forming. Yes, we know the USD/JPY is within its own environment as the BoJ and U.S Treasury/Fed play tag team trying to scare folks away from buying the currency pair. However, putting the JPY to the side for the moment, USD centric weaker positions are showing ability to sustain trends. 

The USD/SGD is a prime example of this momentum. The Fed’s Jackson Hole Symposium begins on the 27th of August and ends on the 29th  and all the major central banks will be attendance. Financial institutions will be keen to hear discussions about U.S bond yields, U.S and Japan currency interventions, but importantly will also want to monitor what Kevin Warsh and his cast of FOMC officers have to say about U.S interest rates. And it has to be known given the past two months from the new Fed Chair, he may remain rather quiet regarding outlook. 

And that might be good for the Forex market and spark some opportunities for traders to find an advantage. Because if nothing new or convincing comes out of the Jackson Hole meetings that financial institutions can decipher regarding their mid-term outlooks, perhaps the near-term will produce more volatility.  The next Federal Reserve FOMC meeting decision will be on the 16th of September. Do not expect interest rates to be raised.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

Share:
USDJPY 20260813

Sentiment Matters: Speculative Narrative and the False Promise of Data

by with No Comment AssetsBehavioral SentimentCentral BanksCommoditiesCryptocurrenciesEconomyEquitiesExclusive ContentFeatured HighlightsFederal Reserve, Interest RatesFinancial InstitutionsForexInvestingRisk ManagementRobert PetrucciSpeculatorsUncategorized

Do Retail Traders Understand They Are Being Misled?

As day traders ponder what they should do next via their speculative wagers in the broad marketplace, now is a good time to remind small speculators stepping into the casino of global assets that a lot of the production value they are offered is part of a show. Entertainment is literally being produced to entice people to trade. A large amount of retail traders are constantly being misled. Your adrenaline high is being counted upon to keep you a participant. The thrill you get when you are trading should not be more important than the outcome of your trade.

Large money machines like the Nasdaq 100, S&P 500, U.S Treasury yields, Forex, commodities and even the cryptocurrencies have plenty of descriptive words and definitions trying to interpret and predict values, trends and outlook, but quite frankly a lot of the words are nonsense created to entice and fool. Making retail traders willing participants in the circus is important because it keeps a lot of the the entertainers employed. 

It should be remembered that a lot of the folks on the institutional side of financial markets do not care about day traders except as an example of what not to do. They use day traders as a touchstone to point to failures and convince you why you are out of your element, while hoping you will stick around to create volumes that are often needed in some speculative assets. Are you being taken advantage of as a small speculator? 

USDJPY 20260813

USD/JPY Long-Term Charts as of 13 August 2026

It is Much Better to be the Bank

A lot of people in the institutional financial industry know one thing for certain, while some make money investing by themselves or produce outstanding results for funds, many do not. There is an old saying among veterans in the arena, “it is much better to be the bank”. Transactional costs from commissions, carrying charges, exchange fees and taxes make money for the institutions and government regulators.

Many folks are involved in the financial markets because it provides a solid pay check, it remains a good career path for those who want the comforts of modern society. However, being a day trader while working another job as a blue collar employee, or business owner, or while being a professional in another endeavor and dreaming about wealth creation via speculation is alluring, but it frequently does not produce steady profits like it does for the people working in financial institutions collecting a paycheck. 

Confirmation Bias and Investment Outcomes

Economists for instance are relied upon to decipher inflation and decode data for devoted audiences. The believers are told why certain assets are reacting and what might happen in the future by the influencers. But this also can manifest into self-fulfilling prophesy that may not actually be connected to real economic outcomes, except that outlooks get fulfilled because of emerging behavioral sentiment.

For instance when yesterday’s U.S Core CPI was released and hit its expectation, what did markets do exactly, what were investors reacting to? The markets reacted to what the perception of mid-term outlooks will now do, based on how they think the Federal Reserve will act in September and the coming months. Reactions to anticipated results are a key factor in market dynamics. Large positions are shifted by financial institutions which have the ability to to absorb short and near-term losses of capital while they wait for their mid-term outlooks to be confirmed. Confirmation bias remains important in the marketplace as results get generated via intraday results as big players thrash violently with massive piles of cash causing technical perspectives to drive algo trading.

Inflation is Not a Joke

Btw, why did god create economists? To make weathermen look good. While that may fray the feelings of economists, the joke holds water. Because observable data and printed results often do not correlate. Just ask global consumers in various nations what they think about their government’s stated inflation data compared to what they are spending on a monthly basis and rising costs. People on the street often feel their national currencies feel like they are losing money no matter what central banks are proclaiming.

Inflation is an important measurement for consumers and investors. But real inflation is often not a desirable talking point for many governments. Often excluded data includes products like food, energy, and mandated medical and pension costs via payments to government social programs. Increasing rent or mortgages via rising interest rates inside of certain government inflation reports are frequently avoided too and would look atrocious. Central banks are supposed to fight inflation, but which inflation exactly? I am digressing I know, this may have nothing to do supposedly with everyday speculating in the marketplace, but actually it does.

Because the Forex market, gold, equity indices are reacting to sentiment generated by the second based on what outlooks will be in vogue in a few months and inflation effects. Our age of social media and fast communication makes the markets vulnerable to fear and optimism equally. Speed matters even if it sometimes causes pain for day traders via lightning quick results in the marketplace as outlooks change constantly.

Make no mistake, market forces are always in play as investors look for value. Sentiment caused by folks like central banks and their policies play consistently important and volatile roles as large players and financial institutions react to tea leaves being read. The USD/JPY is a case in point, the Japanese Yen has been dramatically weak and losing value long-term. 

The intervention by the BoJ and U.S Treasury which was coordinated a couple of weeks ago didn’t fix the problem that Japan has poor monetary and fiscal policy. What it did was serve as a warning to day traders and large players (including banks) not to bet too strongly against the JPY too consistently even if their perceptions tell them otherwise, because the Japanese and U.S government can wreck havoc and create unforgiving momentum which can kill the infectious trend upwards when they desire. 

The BoJ and U.S Treasury definitively put on a show for traders to watch and contemplate before they consider stepping into the casino again. Sometimes it is better to watch the entertainment instead of being an actor within the drama.

Thrill of Risks and Solid Tactical Strategy 

Why do speculators insists on chasing markets without having proper guidance? Why don’t these same smaller traders just let professionals manage their assets and put some money away when they can and accept the returns? Maybe because many speculators are skeptical about the real returns and know they are being made to endure a magic show of sorts. 

Day traders should only risk what they can afford to lose via a speculative allotment of cash. Fund managers for financial institutions, pension funds for example, are often mandated to put 2 to 3% of holdings into speculative assets in order to seek bolder returns. This is one of the reasons why hedge funds and speculative assets flourish in a cyclical manner. Large financial institutions allow for wagering on asset classes they know are dangerous in an extremely limited manner, but with a huge amount of money. Can you say Bitcoin? And it is widely accepted that these speculative positions can be wiped out and destroy capital. Institutions often do not mind losing on limited speculative positions, the same cannot be said for retail traders.

Smaller retail traders should not view themselves engaged in a battle against financial institutions which are filled to the rim with employees who are often unsympathetic about the outcomes produced. The world of speculative betting by retail traders is not about to change. Day traders should study momentum and behavioral sentiment.

Traders need to understand how to manage risks and emotions. While speculators can dream about making illustrious profits to impress friends and partners, if they do not take into the consideration the costs of the risks they are likely going to fall into a deep hole. Strategic tactics are necessary. Retail trading doesn’t have to be a game if it is conducted wisely.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

SpaceX 20260810

With SpaceX IPO, Elon Musk’s New Problem is the End of Easy Money

by with No Comment AssetsBehavioral SentimentCharles NajjarEconomyEquitiesExclusive ContentFeatured HighlightsFederal Reserve, Interest RatesUncategorized

Private Companies Can Raise Capital at Negotiated Valuations, Public Companies Have to Raise Capital at Market Valuations

For years, Elon Musk benefited from something most corporate leaders can only dream of: easy access to practically unlimited private funding at hefty valuations determined by himself. All he had to do was build the proper narrative and convince a few large investors that his own valuation was the right one.

The SpaceX IPO fundamentally changed the process. It doesn’t mean Musk can no longer raise money. Surely, he can. But what changes is the ease, flexibility, and discretion with which he can do so.

When SpaceX was private, raising billions of dollars was relatively straightforward. Musk could approach a small group of investors, give a valuation, issue new shares, and obtain fresh capital without having to expose every detail of the transaction. He didn’t even have to convince all of them. If only a few believed his narrative, the company could raise money at an enormous valuation even while showing continuously negative operating cash flow.

SpaceX 20260810

SpaceX (SPCX) Chart Since IPO as of 10 August 2026

That mechanism becomes much more difficult now that SPCX is publicly traded.

A public company has a market price every second of every trading day. Any new equity issuance is immediately visible. Investors know exactly how many shares are being created, at what price, and why the company needs the money. If the market suspects a company is raising capital because its existing operations cannot finance its ambitions, the stock can fall dramatically. And that creates a fundamental difference.

A private company can raise capital at a negotiated valuation. A public company has to raise capital at a market valuation.

The pressure on Musk is mounting. Every quarter he needs to deliver. Every quarter he needs to find a new narrative to prevent the stock price from collapsing.

Let’s imagine SpaceX needs $10 billion funding. When it was private, Musk could potentially raise the money from institutional investors at a valuation agreed upon with those investors. The transaction itself could even reinforce the perception that SpaceX is worth more.

As a public company, however, the calculation is completely different. If SpaceX is trading at a $1.5 trillion valuation and announces a $10 billion equity offering, investors immediately ask why the company needs the money, whether its cash flow is sufficient, and whether further dilution is coming. And if the stock falls 20% following the announcement, the company would have made its financing problem much worse than before.

This problem is particularly critical because SpaceX is a highly capital-intensive business. Its only profit comes from Starlink. But Starlink cannot finance all the other negative-cash-flow businesses by itself, mainly Starship launches and AI ambitions.

Starlink is the only cash-generating asset inside the group, and it cannot become the piggy bank for the entire group, including Tesla.

How can we forget that, earlier this year, SpaceX came to the rescue of Tesla by buying up all the unsold Cybertruck inventory, at hefty margins for Tesla, which then “beat expectations” thanks to the trick?

Would such a move be accepted by the market now that SpaceX is publicly traded?

When SpaceX was private, the boundaries between Musk’s various ventures were much less visible to the public markets. Capital could move through a relatively complicated ecosystem of private companies and investors.

Now that SPCX is public, the shareholders would question every move, knowing that they are not necessarily willing to see their company become a financing vehicle for every project associated with Elon Musk.

With the SpaceX IPO, Elon Musk played his last Ace card. Now he’s left with a handful of weak cards to try to win the game. He can still bluff that he’s got another Ace hidden in his sleeve, but it’s not clear the market will believe him this time.

Private markets gave Musk something extraordinarily valuable: financial flexibility. Public markets are now forcing him to operate without it.

But Elon Musk’s financing problems aren’t limited to the SpaceX IPO. Like any capital-intensive venture, he also has to contend with the Fed’s ill-considered policy of keeping interest rates high, supposedly to fight inflation that stems from supply shocks.

Because of the Fed, every additional percentage point of interest represents billions of dollars transferred from productive investment to debt servicing. Money that could finance AI chips, data centers, engineers, research laboratories, or new factories instead goes to creditors!

The Fed might believe it is fighting inflation, but it is in fact raising the cost of winning the AI race for companies like SpaceX. 

It’s surprising that Elon Musk isn’t openly denouncing the Fed’s absurdity of keeping interest rates high, when his own companies are among those suffering most from it.

SpaceX’s recent $25 billion bond offering is a perfect illustration. The company issued five tranches, including $3.5 billion of senior notes carrying a 6.65% coupon and maturing in 2056. If the Fed’s rate were closer to 2%, the company’s borrowing costs would be at least half their current level. This bond offering is costing SpaceX somewhere around $1.5 billion a year in interest expense, that could have been slashed by half had the Fed acted quickly in reducing interest rates.

And this is precisely where the Fed’s policy becomes relevant to Musk’s financing problem.

High interest rates make borrowing far more expensive for Musk. At the same time, restrictive monetary policy makes investors more demanding about equity valuations and makes long-duration growth stories more vulnerable to changes in discount rates. They also make car loans much more expensive for potential buyers, which significantly affects Tesla sales.

Musk therefore faces a particularly uncomfortable combination: Equity financing is more visible and potentially dilutive. Debt financing is expensive. Private financing is no longer available on the same scale.

The SpaceX IPO, on top of the Fed’s mistake of keeping interest rates high, is putting significant financial stress on the “richest man in the world” as he urgently needs to find new imaginative ways to fund his highly capital-intensive ventures.

And this is without even considering the probability of a 2008-like financial crash triggered by the bursting of the AI bubble. How would Elon Musk manage to sort himself out this time in case of such financial collapse?

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

Share:
Gold 20260805

Gold Looks Oversold in What Appears to be a Vulnerable Global Market

by with No Comment AssetsBehavioral SentimentCentral BanksEconomyEquitiesExclusive ContentFeatured HighlightsFederal Reserve, Interest RatesFinancial InstitutionsInvestingRisk ManagementRobert PetrucciSpeculatorsUncategorized

Quick Thoughts on Why Gold Should Remain a Friend

Did you stop paying attention to Gold after it stumbled from its record highs in late January? Was it no longer interesting because it wasn’t churning like an invincible machine upwards? Is Gold boring because it has produced sluggish results the past half year that doesn’t deliver the daily excitement craved to get you to wager in the marketplace? No, Gold isn’t WTI Crude Oil which has seen increased volume since late February due to the Iranian war and it might be a while before the precious metal regains a full fanbase.

However, Gold still looks to be in oversold territory. Yes, Gold is near $4,150.00 as of this writing and in the middle of July was below $4,000.00. However, given the fragile behavioral sentiment that is being displayed in the global markets, there is a case for Gold being valued higher. Is the momentum produced upwards the past couple of days a signal that large players are starting to eye the commodity again?

Gold touched a high of nearly $5,610.00 on the 29th of January this year. Speculative fever was certainly ripe. Silver was near $120.00 too. Silver is now priced slightly above $61.00. I am not going to make a case for Silver here, so if you are looking for optimistic or speculative guidelines for ‘Argent’ you will not find it here. If you want to see a positive outlook for Gold please read on, and if you decide this means Silver may find another dose of increased pursuit that is your choice. 

Gold 20260805

Gold One Year Chart as of 5 August 2026

Via a one year chart Gold has lost plenty of value the past six months, but conditions may be turning favorable for the precious metal. Vulnerable sentiment in bonds, equity indices and Forex has grown loud and it might not vanish soon. 

Yes, the Nasdaq 100 is once again back in its higher elements near 29,733.00, and has the 30,000 target lighting up again, but how long will it be before questions about the high cost of data centers, worries about AI revenues come back into vogue? What if interest rate worries continue to cause financial institutions to fear an increase in borrowing costs? What is going to happen if Bitcoin and Strategy (MSTR) implode completely? 

Allow me to say I am not saying Gold will go higher just because BTC/USD and MSTR are imploding, but it will not hurt the case for the precious metal either. Gold looks good because the over all health and sentiment of the marketplace doesn’t look particularly bright. 

If the price of WTI Crude Oil remains within sight of $74.00 and below that will be a positive development regarding inflation concerns, but will it be enough to generate a positive global economy? How will investors react if the Trump administration loses control in the House of Representatives in early November via the mid-term elections?

MSTR 20260805

Strategy (MicroStrategy) One Year Chart as of 5 August 2026

The Case for Gold

Over the past year Gold has turned in a rather remarkable run from a speculative point of view and investment framework. One things stands out, Gold is not going anywhere. It will not disappear suddenly, meaning within the next 100 years and it will still be seen as a store of value. Gold remains a steady unit of secured capital for long-term investors having established a track record the past 3,500 years. Speculators who pursued the run higher, including hedge funds and large players likely lost money as values decreased the past six months, but let’s also note Gold has found rather tight support around its current price point since the middle of June.

Yes, gold lost value after the speculative storm subsided and people turned their wagering attention elsewhere, but the commodities loss of value in the past six months was froth being wiped away from a speculative market in which bulls ran wild.

The Fed may find itself in an increasingly difficult spot with the U.S Treasury reminding the U.S central bank about higher yield provisions. Japan is likely to continue to find it difficult to extricate doubts within financial institutions regarding the JPY. And if investment wheels struggle to produce gains steadily in the asset machines of the stock markets, some folks will turn their mid-term outlooks elsewhere for stability and potential profits.

Gold will continue to shine as it has always done. Fools Gold attracts the ignorant, real Gold attracts those looking to sustain value. I am not saying Gold needs to be $5,000, but Gold looks to be oversold in what feels like an increasingly nervous global market. 

Perhaps that is the risk manager in me taking on the psychological sentiment of nervous investors who do not feel comfortable with the higher yields being seen in U.S Treasuries, the weakness in the USD because of a Fed that many feel lacks clarity or proper policy guidelines, shadows from the Middle East which are unlikely to suddenly disappear even if there is a formal agreement achieved in the near-term…and yes even as Gold has gained the past few days in the midst of the sudden USD slump.

Gold back to the $4,500.00 mark might seem like a farflung wager perhaps, but from a mid-term outlook, one that I wouldn’t be surprised with if it occurs. From a perspective of where things will be within 3 to 6 months I would venture to say Gold should not be lower than it is now. I would be genuinely surprised if it was below $4,000 in November of this year, but would not be surprised if it is touching $4,500 or higher.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

Share:
10Y Treasury Yields 20260728

Thoughts on Kevin Warsh, the Fed and USD, Energy, Nasdaq 100, USD/JPY and Bitcoin

by with No Comment Behavioral SentimentCentral BanksCommoditiesEconomyEquitiesFeatured HighlightsFederal Reserve, Interest RatesForexInvestingRisk ManagementUncategorized

Fed’s Rate Announcement Tomorrow and Underlying Market Conditions as Folks Talk

Tomorrow’s FOMC rate decision from the Federal Reserve continues to cause some angst in the investment community as folks try to decipher Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh’s disdain for tea leaf reading. What is being missed by seemingly a lot of the crowd is the open signal from Warsh that he prefers to keep his outlooks rather muted, this because he appears to be focused on the mid and long-term economic picture.

Simply put, I do not think the Federal Reserve is going to raise interest rates tomorrow, nor will the Fed Chair give too much indication about his thoughts for mid-September. It might be stated in the Fed Press Conference afterwards that the costs of energy is being watched, but that is too obvious. Count on it being recorded that the Federal Reserve will watch data and react accordingly. In the meantime, financial institutions may demonstrate volatile overplayed USD centric positions which look overbought looking into the mid-term, as they still worry about the near-term.

10Y Treasury Yields 20260728

10-Year U.S Treasury Yields Five Year Chart as of 28 July 2026

Political Questions and the Cost of Energy as the Fed Reacts

Let’s for a moment dive into politics. Does anyone think that Kevin Warsh doesn’t speak to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent who has been a long-time associate? And does anyone think Bessent doesn’t have the constant voice of President Donald Trump in his ear? 

The mid-term elections are nearing ladies and gentlemen. The de-escalation in the Iranian situation certainly has something to do with nations expressing wishes for less military action to the White House. Israel, the UAE, Kuwait, Bahrain, Iraq, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkey are trying to influence positions as President Trump considers his next moves regarding alliances and resources. However, the situation may have something to do with the price of WTI Crude Oil too and its effect on U.S manufacturing and surprise, surprise the Federal Reserve. 

Does anyone else remember that the last de-escalation also started just before the Federal Reserve’s last FOMC meeting in June? I am not being a conspiracy fanatic, just pointing out that lower WTI Crude Oil prices do help the case for a Fed outlook which looks at the costs of energy in a pro-active manner, one which might include the U.S economy and internal White House discussions with politicians who represent voters who have the power of creating a backlash. Lower interest rates equate into lower borrowing costs for consumers.

The Fed’s Impact on Equities and Forex (and the USD/JPY)

So if the Fed does not raise tomorrow, nor gives an indication of what it will do in September and offers a stance of ‘we are vigilant and will watch the economy’ will that help sentiment on the Nasdaq 100 which is starting to have the look of a patient with a bad cold who can’t quite seem to get rid of a cough? Microsoft and Meta step into the limelight tomorrow with earnings reports, Amazon and Apple follow on Thursday.  The combination of the Fed and important quarterly earnings will impact Nasdaq sentiment and other equity indices.

It appears analysts of financial institutions are starting to discuss CAPEX – capital and expenditures – openly. And this is creating shadows as investors weigh the costs of energy and infrastructure against stated profit projections. However, let’s not throw the baby out with the bath water, the Nasdaq 100 has a gain of 20%+ over the past year (July to July), and since March the index has still gained 12%+. The war in Iran (excuse me, conflict) has not had a meaningful impact it appears on the outcome of the Nasdaq 100 via sentiment generated. But the shadow of expenditures, debt and revenue is getting louder bandwidth and speculators need to remain cautious in the indices.

Back to the Fed and Forex, the USD has been strong, you are allowed to say extremely strong if you have been betting on downside incorrectly. The USD/JPY is almost in nosebleed terrain, currently 163.830. The Bank of Japan will announce their interest rate policy very early Friday (for those of us not in Asia) and let’s see if the ‘independent’ Bank of Japan is taking a cue from their government which is clearly interested in continuing to build stronger export ratios. Has the Bank of Japan given up the so-called stated fight to keep the JPY within a solid stance? This is doubtful externally, and Japan is certainly not going to allow the USD/JPY to traverse wildly higher, but it may not consider the 165.000 mark as the end of the world. Beware of saber-rattling from the BoJ in the coming days.

Bitcoin 20260728

Bitcoin Five Year Chart as of 28 July 2026

Doubts and Remarks Regarding Bitcoin Below $64K

On a last note, the world of cryptocurrency remains interesting and stormy. It appears from watching the awkward statements from influencers and crypto (including Bitcoin) media outlets the past couple of months, as they attempt to explain their pain and convince others that everyone should buy at these lower values that more troubles are coming. 

What are the influencers, crypto media’s and importantly financial institutions’ actual skin in the game relative to those who have lost interest in Bitcoin and the digital market worth? Are influencers and large institutions like BlackRock hoping to pawn off their suffering ‘asset’ holdings to the public, while trying to convince us that today’s cheap prices represent buying opportunities? Is the wave of slanted influence and panic-like banner waving a hope to save themselves in order to cash out of a sinking market, this while hoping someone else takes their place in lifeboats that face a difficult voyage to safe harbors? 

BTC/USD is near $63,4000 now. Yes, we know, we have been told plenty of times before that all the Bitcoin winters eventually turn into summer again. Blossoms will create the sweet scent of profit we are assured, but what if the winter becomes an ice age? What if Michael Saylor and his ability to produce complex financial statements and instruments for MicroStrategy and Strategy equity shares continue to make little mathematical sense? What if all the investors into Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are left holding the bag and find themselves covered by permafrost? The tundra currently looks harsh. Will the Bitcoin crowd who has been so adamant about being free of regulatory controls and mismanaged central banks cry openly for bailouts from the U.S Treasury with USD? Now that would be entertaining.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share