Singapore Dollar 20260818

Forex: Compressed Tight Realms Signaling Nervous Reactions

by with No Comment Behavioral SentimentCentral BanksCommoditiesEconomic CalendarEquitiesFeatured HighlightsFederal Reserve, Interest RatesFinancial InstitutionsForexInvestingRisk ManagementSpeculatorsUncategorized

Sentiment Storms as Financial Institutions Remain Unsure about Outlooks

Price action in the USD/SGD has continued to demonstrate a rather significant turn downwards since the last week of June. The price of the currency pair is near 1.27800 as of this writing and is traversing near values seen the 1st of June and towards the end of the first week of March. Importantly, the USD/SGD has also seen recent lower depths and was below 1.27000 in the second week of May.

The USD/SGD traversed deeper ratios in late January when the 1.26000 vicinity was challenged and these levels were sustained until the middle of February. On the 26th of February the USD/SGD was near the 1.26500 mark. Now that the above numbers have been established, let’s discuss why this is potentially important for Forex traders as developing trends surface.

The past few years of trading have seen a compression of Forex deviations, in other words the FX market has grown more tame. However, the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) now reports that over 9.6 trillion USD in value is traded daily. This is a stark increase compared to 2022 when Forex saw an average daily market around 7.5 trillion – meaning there has been a 28% increase over the past four years.

Singapore Dollar 20260818

USD/SGD One Year Chart as of 18 August 2026

The scope of volume is presented not to cause fear, but to show Forex traders what is at stake and the size of the marketplace and its potential for sudden jolts of volatility if it is established. 

Turning our attention to the new Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh and his preference to not give concrete forward guidance is important. U.S Treasury yields are dangerously high (the 30-Y yield is near 5.31%), and the military conflict between Iran and the U.S  continues to fester. Threats remain on the horizon which need observation, insights that prove correct regarding how these bits of information will influence the Fed Chair and the impact on the USD could prove significant for financial institutions.

Large players have reasons to be critical about a lack of clarity and this might spark more choppiness in Forex – even though value realms are said to be in a compressed state. This opens the door for technical traders who may have a better gauge on existing behavioral sentiment of the Forex markets compared to fundamental traders who have too many tea leaves to interpret which are moving rapidly as the cup gets shifted. Technical traders may have a good sense of where algo trading is directing its velocity per current Forex sentiment. 

While some analysts make a case for an increase to the Federal Funds Rate because of inflation concerns, what happens if they are wrong? And what if large players are now discounting their initial fears regarding higher interest rates and are actually starting to position themselves for the Fed Funds Rate to remain the same or be lowered in the mid-term? Is this one of the reasons why the USD has become weaker recently?

What if the new Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh proves stronger than people believe and has the ability to talk lower interest rates into reality? The U.S Treasury faces a huge and expensive task trying to pay off the yields of the high flying 10-Year and 30-Year bonds. What if Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent who has a solid relationship with Fed Chair Warsh proves influential? Read AMT’s Charles Najjar’s article on his thoughts about why the Fed should aim for a 2% Fund Rate: https://www.angrymetatraders.com/why-the-us-fed-should-lower-interest-rates-to-2/

Yes, the Middle East situation remains troubling from a mid-term economic viewpoint regarding the implications on WTI Crude Oil prices and ancillary energy costs globally. Inflation must be battled, but is raising the Federal Funds Rate going to help decrease the cost of energy or lessen its demand? Mostly likely no.

US Dollar Index 20260818

U.S Dollar Index One Year Chart as of 18 August 2026

The gold market has started to show signs of price velocity the past couple of weeks. The precious metal is trading near $4,395.00 as of this writing. Investors with a long-term window and troubled perspectives about the health of the USD have plenty of reasons to be more comfortable holding gold compared to staying in cash. 

U.S equities have been doing well via indices, but nervous shadows are hovering (maybe they always are). And this is why diversification is always important via long-term investment. Equities, bonds, gold and a small proportion for speculative purposes – this for those who want to try and increase their wealth while maintaining a status quo regarding preservation of wealth.

However, from a speculative standpoint, the Forex market is starting to show signs of alarming behavior, some may even call it a lack of correlation caused by storms forming. Yes, we know the USD/JPY is within its own environment as the BoJ and U.S Treasury/Fed play tag team trying to scare folks away from buying the currency pair. However, putting the JPY to the side for the moment, USD centric weaker positions are showing ability to sustain trends. 

The USD/SGD is a prime example of this momentum. The Fed’s Jackson Hole Symposium begins on the 27th of August and ends on the 29th  and all the major central banks will be attendance. Financial institutions will be keen to hear discussions about U.S bond yields, U.S and Japan currency interventions, but importantly will also want to monitor what Kevin Warsh and his cast of FOMC officers have to say about U.S interest rates. And it has to be known given the past two months from the new Fed Chair, he may remain rather quiet regarding outlook. 

And that might be good for the Forex market and spark some opportunities for traders to find an advantage. Because if nothing new or convincing comes out of the Jackson Hole meetings that financial institutions can decipher regarding their mid-term outlooks, perhaps the near-term will produce more volatility.  The next Federal Reserve FOMC meeting decision will be on the 16th of September. Do not expect interest rates to be raised.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

Share:
USDJPY 20260813

Sentiment Matters: Speculative Narrative and the False Promise of Data

by with No Comment AssetsBehavioral SentimentCentral BanksCommoditiesCryptocurrenciesEconomyEquitiesExclusive ContentFeatured HighlightsFederal Reserve, Interest RatesFinancial InstitutionsForexInvestingRisk ManagementRobert PetrucciSpeculatorsUncategorized

Do Retail Traders Understand They Are Being Misled?

As day traders ponder what they should do next via their speculative wagers in the broad marketplace, now is a good time to remind small speculators stepping into the casino of global assets that a lot of the production value they are offered is part of a show. Entertainment is literally being produced to entice people to trade. A large amount of retail traders are constantly being misled. Your adrenaline high is being counted upon to keep you a participant. The thrill you get when you are trading should not be more important than the outcome of your trade.

Large money machines like the Nasdaq 100, S&P 500, U.S Treasury yields, Forex, commodities and even the cryptocurrencies have plenty of descriptive words and definitions trying to interpret and predict values, trends and outlook, but quite frankly a lot of the words are nonsense created to entice and fool. Making retail traders willing participants in the circus is important because it keeps a lot of the the entertainers employed. 

It should be remembered that a lot of the folks on the institutional side of financial markets do not care about day traders except as an example of what not to do. They use day traders as a touchstone to point to failures and convince you why you are out of your element, while hoping you will stick around to create volumes that are often needed in some speculative assets. Are you being taken advantage of as a small speculator? 

USDJPY 20260813

USD/JPY Long-Term Charts as of 13 August 2026

It is Much Better to be the Bank

A lot of people in the institutional financial industry know one thing for certain, while some make money investing by themselves or produce outstanding results for funds, many do not. There is an old saying among veterans in the arena, “it is much better to be the bank”. Transactional costs from commissions, carrying charges, exchange fees and taxes make money for the institutions and government regulators.

Many folks are involved in the financial markets because it provides a solid pay check, it remains a good career path for those who want the comforts of modern society. However, being a day trader while working another job as a blue collar employee, or business owner, or while being a professional in another endeavor and dreaming about wealth creation via speculation is alluring, but it frequently does not produce steady profits like it does for the people working in financial institutions collecting a paycheck. 

Confirmation Bias and Investment Outcomes

Economists for instance are relied upon to decipher inflation and decode data for devoted audiences. The believers are told why certain assets are reacting and what might happen in the future by the influencers. But this also can manifest into self-fulfilling prophesy that may not actually be connected to real economic outcomes, except that outlooks get fulfilled because of emerging behavioral sentiment.

For instance when yesterday’s U.S Core CPI was released and hit its expectation, what did markets do exactly, what were investors reacting to? The markets reacted to what the perception of mid-term outlooks will now do, based on how they think the Federal Reserve will act in September and the coming months. Reactions to anticipated results are a key factor in market dynamics. Large positions are shifted by financial institutions which have the ability to to absorb short and near-term losses of capital while they wait for their mid-term outlooks to be confirmed. Confirmation bias remains important in the marketplace as results get generated via intraday results as big players thrash violently with massive piles of cash causing technical perspectives to drive algo trading.

Inflation is Not a Joke

Btw, why did god create economists? To make weathermen look good. While that may fray the feelings of economists, the joke holds water. Because observable data and printed results often do not correlate. Just ask global consumers in various nations what they think about their government’s stated inflation data compared to what they are spending on a monthly basis and rising costs. People on the street often feel their national currencies feel like they are losing money no matter what central banks are proclaiming.

Inflation is an important measurement for consumers and investors. But real inflation is often not a desirable talking point for many governments. Often excluded data includes products like food, energy, and mandated medical and pension costs via payments to government social programs. Increasing rent or mortgages via rising interest rates inside of certain government inflation reports are frequently avoided too and would look atrocious. Central banks are supposed to fight inflation, but which inflation exactly? I am digressing I know, this may have nothing to do supposedly with everyday speculating in the marketplace, but actually it does.

Because the Forex market, gold, equity indices are reacting to sentiment generated by the second based on what outlooks will be in vogue in a few months and inflation effects. Our age of social media and fast communication makes the markets vulnerable to fear and optimism equally. Speed matters even if it sometimes causes pain for day traders via lightning quick results in the marketplace as outlooks change constantly.

Make no mistake, market forces are always in play as investors look for value. Sentiment caused by folks like central banks and their policies play consistently important and volatile roles as large players and financial institutions react to tea leaves being read. The USD/JPY is a case in point, the Japanese Yen has been dramatically weak and losing value long-term. 

The intervention by the BoJ and U.S Treasury which was coordinated a couple of weeks ago didn’t fix the problem that Japan has poor monetary and fiscal policy. What it did was serve as a warning to day traders and large players (including banks) not to bet too strongly against the JPY too consistently even if their perceptions tell them otherwise, because the Japanese and U.S government can wreck havoc and create unforgiving momentum which can kill the infectious trend upwards when they desire. 

The BoJ and U.S Treasury definitively put on a show for traders to watch and contemplate before they consider stepping into the casino again. Sometimes it is better to watch the entertainment instead of being an actor within the drama.

Thrill of Risks and Solid Tactical Strategy 

Why do speculators insists on chasing markets without having proper guidance? Why don’t these same smaller traders just let professionals manage their assets and put some money away when they can and accept the returns? Maybe because many speculators are skeptical about the real returns and know they are being made to endure a magic show of sorts. 

Day traders should only risk what they can afford to lose via a speculative allotment of cash. Fund managers for financial institutions, pension funds for example, are often mandated to put 2 to 3% of holdings into speculative assets in order to seek bolder returns. This is one of the reasons why hedge funds and speculative assets flourish in a cyclical manner. Large financial institutions allow for wagering on asset classes they know are dangerous in an extremely limited manner, but with a huge amount of money. Can you say Bitcoin? And it is widely accepted that these speculative positions can be wiped out and destroy capital. Institutions often do not mind losing on limited speculative positions, the same cannot be said for retail traders.

Smaller retail traders should not view themselves engaged in a battle against financial institutions which are filled to the rim with employees who are often unsympathetic about the outcomes produced. The world of speculative betting by retail traders is not about to change. Day traders should study momentum and behavioral sentiment.

Traders need to understand how to manage risks and emotions. While speculators can dream about making illustrious profits to impress friends and partners, if they do not take into the consideration the costs of the risks they are likely going to fall into a deep hole. Strategic tactics are necessary. Retail trading doesn’t have to be a game if it is conducted wisely.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

Gold 20260805

Gold Looks Oversold in What Appears to be a Vulnerable Global Market

by with No Comment AssetsBehavioral SentimentCentral BanksEconomyEquitiesExclusive ContentFeatured HighlightsFederal Reserve, Interest RatesFinancial InstitutionsInvestingRisk ManagementRobert PetrucciSpeculatorsUncategorized

Quick Thoughts on Why Gold Should Remain a Friend

Did you stop paying attention to Gold after it stumbled from its record highs in late January? Was it no longer interesting because it wasn’t churning like an invincible machine upwards? Is Gold boring because it has produced sluggish results the past half year that doesn’t deliver the daily excitement craved to get you to wager in the marketplace? No, Gold isn’t WTI Crude Oil which has seen increased volume since late February due to the Iranian war and it might be a while before the precious metal regains a full fanbase.

However, Gold still looks to be in oversold territory. Yes, Gold is near $4,150.00 as of this writing and in the middle of July was below $4,000.00. However, given the fragile behavioral sentiment that is being displayed in the global markets, there is a case for Gold being valued higher. Is the momentum produced upwards the past couple of days a signal that large players are starting to eye the commodity again?

Gold touched a high of nearly $5,610.00 on the 29th of January this year. Speculative fever was certainly ripe. Silver was near $120.00 too. Silver is now priced slightly above $61.00. I am not going to make a case for Silver here, so if you are looking for optimistic or speculative guidelines for ‘Argent’ you will not find it here. If you want to see a positive outlook for Gold please read on, and if you decide this means Silver may find another dose of increased pursuit that is your choice. 

Gold 20260805

Gold One Year Chart as of 5 August 2026

Via a one year chart Gold has lost plenty of value the past six months, but conditions may be turning favorable for the precious metal. Vulnerable sentiment in bonds, equity indices and Forex has grown loud and it might not vanish soon. 

Yes, the Nasdaq 100 is once again back in its higher elements near 29,733.00, and has the 30,000 target lighting up again, but how long will it be before questions about the high cost of data centers, worries about AI revenues come back into vogue? What if interest rate worries continue to cause financial institutions to fear an increase in borrowing costs? What is going to happen if Bitcoin and Strategy (MSTR) implode completely? 

Allow me to say I am not saying Gold will go higher just because BTC/USD and MSTR are imploding, but it will not hurt the case for the precious metal either. Gold looks good because the over all health and sentiment of the marketplace doesn’t look particularly bright. 

If the price of WTI Crude Oil remains within sight of $74.00 and below that will be a positive development regarding inflation concerns, but will it be enough to generate a positive global economy? How will investors react if the Trump administration loses control in the House of Representatives in early November via the mid-term elections?

MSTR 20260805

Strategy (MicroStrategy) One Year Chart as of 5 August 2026

The Case for Gold

Over the past year Gold has turned in a rather remarkable run from a speculative point of view and investment framework. One things stands out, Gold is not going anywhere. It will not disappear suddenly, meaning within the next 100 years and it will still be seen as a store of value. Gold remains a steady unit of secured capital for long-term investors having established a track record the past 3,500 years. Speculators who pursued the run higher, including hedge funds and large players likely lost money as values decreased the past six months, but let’s also note Gold has found rather tight support around its current price point since the middle of June.

Yes, gold lost value after the speculative storm subsided and people turned their wagering attention elsewhere, but the commodities loss of value in the past six months was froth being wiped away from a speculative market in which bulls ran wild.

The Fed may find itself in an increasingly difficult spot with the U.S Treasury reminding the U.S central bank about higher yield provisions. Japan is likely to continue to find it difficult to extricate doubts within financial institutions regarding the JPY. And if investment wheels struggle to produce gains steadily in the asset machines of the stock markets, some folks will turn their mid-term outlooks elsewhere for stability and potential profits.

Gold will continue to shine as it has always done. Fools Gold attracts the ignorant, real Gold attracts those looking to sustain value. I am not saying Gold needs to be $5,000, but Gold looks to be oversold in what feels like an increasingly nervous global market. 

Perhaps that is the risk manager in me taking on the psychological sentiment of nervous investors who do not feel comfortable with the higher yields being seen in U.S Treasuries, the weakness in the USD because of a Fed that many feel lacks clarity or proper policy guidelines, shadows from the Middle East which are unlikely to suddenly disappear even if there is a formal agreement achieved in the near-term…and yes even as Gold has gained the past few days in the midst of the sudden USD slump.

Gold back to the $4,500.00 mark might seem like a farflung wager perhaps, but from a mid-term outlook, one that I wouldn’t be surprised with if it occurs. From a perspective of where things will be within 3 to 6 months I would venture to say Gold should not be lower than it is now. I would be genuinely surprised if it was below $4,000 in November of this year, but would not be surprised if it is touching $4,500 or higher.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

Share:
US Dollar Index 20260804

Apologia: Confronting Market Opinions and Pointing Out Wrongs

by with No Comment AssetsBehavioral SentimentCommoditiesEquitiesFeatured HighlightsFinancial InstitutionsForexRisk ManagementSpeculatorsUncategorized

The Markets Can and Will Harm You, Can You Survive?

The U.S Dollar Index is back to where it was trading on Friday the 13th of March. (Yes, a Friday the 13th). Literally a week and half after the Iranian war started from a trading perspective. We are almost half a year into the war and many are still acting surprised by surges which churn on a daily basis in WTI Crude Oil and a host of other assets including bonds, equities – indices, and Forex. 

A large group of people are acting as if the USD selloff sparked across the Forex board on Friday was doomsday and had evil intentions. But what if the Trump administration actually wants a weaker USD? What if all they need to do is to get Wall Street to kick into gear and create higher values to change behavioral sentiment in Treasury yields? It is not so easy to fool professionals is it?

The narrative that the N.Y Fed via orders from the U.S Treasury was selling USD to strengthen the JPY became a conspiracy masterclass in over-reaction. Particularly because the BoJ had intervened twice already this year prior to Friday’s action – why is nobody pointing to that? It doesn’t mean, by the way, that the BoJ suddenly knows what they are doing, but it doesn’t mean that the financial end of the world is near. We need to get over our own fears.

Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh may be new on the job, he may be nervous, but he is not a schoolboy, and likely has a plan of action. I agree it sometimes is not easy to discern what Warsh wants exactly, but the USD is now weaker and maybe Scott Bessent and Donald Trump do not mind. I didn’t call Bessent and Trump the Fed Chair’s boss please note – he is independent after all. Cough, cough.

Everyone Has An Opinion, Many of Them Are Wrong

I have a good friend who constantly tells me to make sure I give an opinion, he will know who he is when I say he has proven to be the worst trader I have ever known. Hello there, Mr. Bad Trader if you are reading. Part of the reason he is so bad at trading is because he has never understood who he is as an individual participant in the marketplace.

US Dollar Index 20260804

U.S Dollar Index Six Month Chart as of 4 August 2026

His ego will not let him admit to himself he is wrong. This is not an easy thing to do for anyone. When is the last time you were able to admit you were wrong about a market position and turn around on a dime and be willing to take a loss? 

My friend doesn’t seem capable of understanding he is not an investor, he is a trader. While his outlooks about the market often prove correct, his timeframes constantly complicate matters. He has never had the temprament to be an investor, he is too impatient. He always used too much exposure via leverage and he remained unwilling to change his sails even when the winds clearly told him he was about to get wrecked. My friend no longer trades.

I am certain he would be willing to trade someone else’s money, but he has no funds to risk on his own. And I kid you not when I say he has attempted to prove the marketplace wrong more times then can be counted and still thinks he will eventually be proven correct. 

So when was the last time you were able to change your mind about an opinion you held? When was the last time you said to yourself and aloud, “I am wrong and I misunderstood the circumstances.” And do you know why you were wrong?

We listen to analysts tell us why the marketplace is going to sink, we also pay attention when they say an asset is going to the moon. Analysts are never held accountable because they are able to say things like past results do not guarantee future results. They also get to point to risk disclaimers, have a look at ours angrymetatraders.com/risk-disclaimer, protecting their opinions about the markets put forth. So why should you pay attention to someone who has no skin in your game? Because it is important to get other viewpoints, once in a while you may actually be able to allow yourself to admit that your perspective is only one of many.

The broad markets have been unkind the last six months in many ways to retail speculators. Investors have gotten hurt, but they will likely survive or at least find a job elsewhere if they cannot improve their results in the coming months to hide their failures at their current firms. This is not a polite game you are playing as a retail trader. Your brokers’ no doubt love you and talk to you about the markets and your participation like it is a sporting event. ‘Even the great ones fail once in while,” have you heard this one? 

Yesterday I stumbled upon someone’s post on LinkedIn discussing a theory and ability to only aim for a half a percent of gain everyday as if that small target somehow made it achievable – all the time. Like compound interest they subtly suggested, half a percent gained everyday would show the level of control you would have in the marketplace and allow you to make millions of dollars within a few years. Good news, isn’t it?

However, many of us know, it just isn’t that easy. While it is a great notion to remain focused and not be too ambitious while trading, buying someone else’s system for a lot of money or being charged their management fee is a little like being chewed on slowly by a vulture. 

Where is the optimism? Where is the golden secret that will allow you to become a better trader? I don’t have any, except to say diligence, determination and knowing when you are wrong and need to get out of a position is vital. We all want to find the big wave and ride momentum in order to profit. 

Sometimes the markets look like they offer riches for the brave, but sometimes they turn into a pile of ashes. No matter how hard influencers want to praise certain assets they cannot shine a turd into gold. Sometimes the turds are merely garbage and need to be treated like fertilizer, allowing for something else to grow its in its place. Maybe that is replacement theory. Maybe it is meaningless. But this is a game with hard rules, risk management and knowing when you are wrong are among some of the more important early lessons that should be sustained.

A lot of smaller players are angry at larger players in the marketplace, the reason for this has a lot to do with survivability. Small traders like my friend are no longer able to speculate, big players who are frequently part of larger financial institutions simply go home and wait for another day. Those are my opinions, take them or leave them. Tomorrow is a new day and may offer more clarity, for the moment I suggest being careful in the broad markets.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

Share:
Bitcoin 20260730

Debunking Bitcoin Lies

by with No Comment AssetsBehavioral SentimentBusinessCharles NajjarCommoditiesCryptocurrenciesCryptocurrencies & Digital AssetsExclusive ContentFeatured HighlightsFinancial InstitutionsInvestingRisk ManagementSpeculatorsUncategorized

The Paradox, Absurdity, Lies and Myths of Bitcoin

They say it’s an “asset”… but it has zero assets.

They say it’s decentralized… but the large majority of all transactions go through trading platforms.

They say it’s digital gold… but it has none of the physical attributes gold derives its value.

They say it’s immune to censorship… but countries like the US and China manage to be the largest holders without buying any Bitcoin.

They say it’s scarce… but there are 2.1 quadrillion Satoshi units that act exactly like a Bitcoin unit.

They say it’s a store of value… but it has witnessed several -50% to -80% drawdowns in its short history.

They say it derives its value from energy… but energy is a massive cost that someone has to pay!

Bitcoin 20260730

BTC/USD Chart Since 2015 as of 30 July 2026

The Bitcoin protocol was introduced as a new monetary system: decentralized, censorship-resistant, scarce, transparent, secure, and independent of governments and financial intermediaries. It promised to eliminate the need for trusted third parties and replace institutional trust with a code.

However, more than fifteen years later, Bitcoin has failed on all those fake promises…

Today, the Bitcoin ecosystem is increasingly dependent on centralized exchanges, custodians, mining companies, stablecoin issuers, institutional investors, and financial intermediaries. The supposedly revolutionary monetary asset has become deeply intertwined with the very financial infrastructure it was designed to bypass.

And beneath everything lies an uncomfortable economic reality: the Bitcoin mining industry must continuously spend real resources (electricity, capital, land, labor, and massive equipment that becomes obsolete very quickly) to generate a virtual token that is distributed randomly… with the reward being halved by design every four years! What business model can survive such a flawed system where revenues are distributed randomly and halved every four years while costs increase constantly with adoption? It is the exact opposite of an economy of scale. The more successful your product is, the deeper your losses are! Even Fried Thiel, MARA’s CEO, ended up admitting that Bitcoin mining is a “zero sum game”! With miners doomed to fail economically, Bitcoin’s network security is destined to failure.

1. The Decentralization Paradox

The word “decentralized” is perhaps the most important word in the Bitcoin vocabulary.

In practice, it is far from being the case. Most Bitcoin transactions go through exchanges, custodians, brokers, or institutional funds (ETFs). Even miners store their mined bitcoins with custodians like Coinbase.

Today, the entire ecosystem relies on the solvency of companies like Coinbase, Binance, Tether, Strategy… all of which are in a critical financial situation. Should any of them collapse, the whole house of cards will fall down.

The irony is striking. Bitcoin was designed to eliminate the need for trusted intermediaries. Yet Bitcoin users increasingly trust intermediaries to hold their Bitcoins. Even miners do! How absurd is that?

2. The 21 Million Fake Limit

The most used argument for Bitcoin is that there will only ever be 21 million bitcoins.

But the statement requires closer examination too. A bitcoin is divisible into 100 million Satoshis. Each Satoshi has exactly the same “shape,” the same function, and the same attributes as a Bitcoin! Dividing something into exact copies of itself acts like a multiplier! That means the real supply is 2.1 quadrillion units (call them Satoshis or Bitcoins, it doesn’t matter).

The immediate response from Bitcoin supporters is that this is no different from saying that one dollar consists of 100 cents… but the dollar was never designed to have an absolute monetary cap.

The question then becomes whether the 21 million cap creates meaningful economic scarcity or simply a narrative of scarcity for marketing purposes. Anyway, the scarcity of something useless doesn’t make it useful…

The “21 million limit” becomes even more absurd when we consider the enormous number of other cryptocurrencies and tokens that exist. If scarcity itself is the central source of value, why should Bitcoin’s scarcity be uniquely valuable? The crypto ecosystem has demonstrated that creating a new digital asset is technically easy. Anyone can create a token with a fixed supply. If we create another digital token with a 10 million limit, much lower than Bitcoin’s 21 million limit, would it be worth more than Bitcoin because it would be considered scarcer? How can something be considered scarce if it can be replicated indefinitely with exactly the same “unique” attributes?

3. The “Digital Gold” Absurdity

They say Bitcoin is digital gold. Yet gold has physical properties that have made it valuable for thousands of years: durability, divisibility, portability, resistance to corrosion, and usefulness in jewelry and industry. Bitcoin has none of those unique physical attributes. Take away those physical attributes from gold, and it loses all its value. Since Bitcoin is gold without its physical attributes, it is therefore worth nothing! It’s as if we created a virtual token and called it “digital water,” pretending it’s “liquid” and “essential to life.” Still, if we can’t drink it or wash with it, what value would it have? Not only does Bitcoin have no intrinsic value, but it also requires continued investment in heavy infrastructure and massive electricity consumption to stay alive. It is like having a car parked in a garage, continuously consuming gas to remain “alive,” while you pretend it has value because it is unique! Once gold is mined, it costs nothing to continue existing. When Bitcoin is mined, the network needs to keep running on heavy electricity consumption for the Bitcoin to remain “alive.”

4. The “Censorship Proof” Lie

Governments around the world have acquired Bitcoin through seizures, confiscations, enforcement actions, bankruptcies, and other means. That’s how a digital coin created as a challenge to government monetary authority ended up in government-controlled wallets.

Governments do not need to control the blockchain to influence the market. They can shut down crypto platforms and seize their assets. What happened to the promise of monetary freedom?

5. The Myth of Low-Cost Bitcoin

Bitcoin is sometimes described as a cheap way to transfer money. The comparison can be attractive. There is no need for a traditional bank to approve a transaction. The network operates continuously.

But the cost of the system is not simply the transaction fee paid by the user. There is also the cost of maintaining the infrastructure. Bitcoin mining consumes enormous amounts of electricity and requires heavy equipment that becomes rapidly obsolete. The economic cost of maintaining the network is simply unsustainable. All listed miners show constant negative cash flow with massive dilution of shareholders and collapsing stock prices. It is not a coincidence. It is simply a sign that Bitcoin mining is economically unsustainable. It is a fundamentally losing business that is doomed to fail. When most miners inevitably capitulate, they will sell their Bitcoin reserves and provoke a massive collapse in the price. With less than 5% remaining to be mined over the next 100 years, there will be zero incentive for miners to start all over again. Bitcoin is doomed to fail from within.

If Bitcoin were truly revolutionary, all large technology companies, like Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Meta, would have jumped in to get their market share (as they did for AI)… instead we have empty shells with no business model, like Strategy, Nakamoto Inc, and Metaplanet, turning into “Bitcoin treasury” companies while incurring heavy losses and permanent negative cash flow.

Bitcoin was designed as an alternative to financial intermediaries. Now collapsing “treasury companies” and unsecured crypto platforms control the ecosystem. We shifted the risk from banks like JPMorgan, Citi, or Morgan Stanley, supported by the US central bank, to entities like Coinbase, Tether, and Binance… some of which aren’t even audited! And all without any support from a central authority.

The user may distrust banks, but he is asked to trust an exchange. The user may distrust central banks, but he is asked to trust a stablecoin issuer. The system has not eliminated trust. It has redistributed it to a much weaker ecosystem!

Bitcoin will be remembered as the greatest bubble of all time and the largest misallocation of capital and resources in human history.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

Share:
Indian Rupee 20260729

India Insider: Real Story Behind the Rupee’s Weakness

by with No Comment Behavioral SentimentBen EzraCentral BanksEconomyExclusive ContentFeatured HighlightsFinancial InstitutionsIndiaInvestingSpeculatorsUncategorizedWorld

Change of Policy Could Create a Stronger INR

RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra says, Rupee depreciation doesn’t reflect weaknesses in the underlying economy. He says that the external factors due to geopolitical tensions induced by oil prices rising has created a Dollar demand and created Rupee weakness. 

While it’s true the Rupee has depreciated because of foreign capital fleeing and oil importers’ persistent demand for USD when buying oil and gas, this doesn’t answer the entire issue regarding INR vulnerability.

Questions surrounding the Rupee’s weakness should also focus on fundamental causes for depreciation. For instance, the Rupee has largely depreciated the past 5 years from 2021 – from 74.50 per Dollar – and into 2026, where its trading around 95.72 per the USD/INR now. Why?

Indian Rupee 20260729

USD/INR Five Year Chart as of 29 July 2026

Nominal depreciation has been 28%, and this is despite service exports growing healthier, and remittances flows that have been good in the last few years. Can the RBI governor say anything related to it?

Why Does the Rupee Remain Weak?

Economists point to the widening gap between India’s foreign inflows and outflows as a structural flaw that’s weighed on the Rupee and growth. A reason for this is India’s struggle to attract long-term capital through Foreign Direct Investment. Net FDI has declined from $28 billion in 2022-23 year to just $7.7 billion in the financial year that ended in March.

Foreign multinationals, venture capitalists and private equity titans have been taking advantage of high valuations to cash out. Despite recent pro-business reforms by Narendra Modi’s government, India’s shabby infrastructure and a bureaucracy that reduces Byzantium schemes to shame, puts off new arrivals. This is also a reason why tradable exports are not growing compared to India’s vast import needs. India’s exchange rate remains relatively overvalued, even though in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms, Indian products are inexpensive compared with those of the United States.

India could have allowed the Rupee to reflect it’s underlying market fundamentals in order to make it’s exports more competitive and restore external balance. Given the high supply of skilled India’s labor force and opportunities in small and medium scale businesses, especially in agricultural value added products where India holds competitive advantages, it’s not impossible to improve tradable export volumes. Instead, the Reserve Bank of India went in the opposite direction by managing the Rupee at 83/USD and made it overvalued, especially when Shaktikanda Das was the Governor of RBI.

If the RBI truly believes in India’s economic fundamentals story, then why did it intervene aggressively during the 2023-2024 period? Critics argued these known interventions may also have had the effect of supporting India’s GDP when measured in USD, although the RBI maintains that its objective was to reduce excessive volatility and preserve financial stability.

Even with respect to headline GDP growth numbers, many economists in India and around the world still believe that Indian statistical numbers overstate the actual strength of the underlying economy. To generate better growth data in India, the government has expanded it capital expenditures to compensate against relatively weak private investment. However, creating jobs and opportunities for linkages – opportunities in sector related industries, and enhancing India’s trade competitiveness via high value exports are important and urgent, rather than depending on foreign capital flows. In this regard, private capital expenditures still need to increase substantially.

Relying on short term capital flows for managing the current account deficit is a difficult strategy. Even if the RBI believes a de-escalation in the US and Iran War will occur, and believes that global liquidity conditions will allow the RBI to accumulate higher Forex reserves, risks remain skewed negatively to the upside without meaningful changes to improve long-term net Foreign Direct Investment.

David Lubin of Chatham House argues that countries should not rely only on high Forex reserves to protect themselves from volatile capital flows. The best strategy in his view is to reduce the potential problems at its source by discouraging unstable, short term inflows, and ensuring banks do not accumulate excessive foreign currency risks.

However, this is exactly what India is doing by mobilizing leveraged foreign currency deposits from non-resident Indian’s and offering hedging for these inflows until September 2026. Reserve Bank of India Governor Malhotra has stated that the RBI has attracted around $32 billion worth of USD inflows via this route.

Arguably, another side of the equation should be examined. If central banks were to accumulate FX reserves for the sake of paying for their imports, without meaningful reforms in their own economy and not creating conditions for capital to be deposited long-term, no capital controls can ably solve the underlying deficits or surplus nature for those respective economies.

In India capital account surplus has created deficits because the net Foreign Direct Investment has been weak resulting in funding costs for transactions in current accounts to increase. Apparently, this dilemma goes beyond the RBI balance sheet capabilities and exposes flaws in the fundamental reality of economic internal policies. The ensuing crisis hits the Rupee faster as capital leaves and damages the exchange rate.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

Share:
Alphabet 20260724

The Not So Coincidental World of Google and WTI Crude Oil

by with No Comment AssetsBehavioral SentimentBusinessCommoditiesEconomyEquitiesExclusive ContentFeatured HighlightsFederal Reserve, Interest RatesFinancial InstitutionsInvestingMajor Global Equity IndicesRisk ManagementRobert PetrucciSpeculatorsUncategorizedWorld

Energy and Commodities in a World Where Legacy and Infrastructure Collide

Google (Alphabet) finished yesterday’s trading near $ 317.69, as of this moment WTI Crude Oil is around $88.50. It might seem rather odd to pair the two into the same paragraph, but this is not a coincidence. Both are now relevant regarding energy costs for consumers and produce an abundance of legacy products the world over. And oddly enough their one year charts almost look as if they are dancing in step.

Google is facing headwinds in recent trading as questions surround its capability to produce revenues because of its push into Artificial Intelligence and always growing need for more data center power. AI which has been an abundant source of bullishness in the Nasdaq 100 and had a knock-on effect into the S&P 500 the past couple of years has become shadowed by concerns of turning into a commodity. 

Alphabet 20260724

Alphabet (Google) One Year Chart as of 24 July 2026

As competition in the AI sector increases this is creating pressure on prices in order to allure customers away from competing brands. China is also stepping into the world of Artificial Intelligence and it will certainly use its ability to produce less expensive products moving forward. Profit margins are being fought over by competing companies

Google is not a poor company, but there are growing doubts about its debt and revenue ratios. The costs to power its worldwide data ability for its users and its investment into AI via Gemini and its DeepMind technology does not have a particularly easy solution. Estimates from a variety of sources claim that Google has reduced its staff between 1,500 to 3,000 through employee reductions and reorganization, this as the company needs to pile more cash into infrastructure.

The onslaught of other companies able to produce AI which is seen as more robust and capable have also caused a marketing headache for Google, which has an effect on behavioral sentiment. GOOGL was trading at apex levels only two months ago when it was traversing above the $400.00 mark. The downturn thus far has been bad, but not catastrophic. 

WTI Crude Oil 20260726

WTI Crude Oil One Year Chart as of 24 July 2026

While nervous sentiment can be blamed on the situation in the Middle East the past handful of months, the downturn which has occurred for Google and other important companies on the Nasdaq 100 involved or seen as having an ancillary association with AI needs to be considered a legitimate reaction because of worries surfacing regarding the ability to simply pay for all of the research and infrastructure. 

In order to power AI it is becoming clear that energy costs are part of investing frameworks. Concerns about an AI bubble started to gather an audience last fall and the rumblings have grown louder, yet it can be said the ability of Google and many other companies to gain the past year in value still outweighs this current downturn experienced the past couple of months.

The Iranian war which is ongoing, appears to be entering a phase in which financial institutions are having to succumb to the notion of higher prices not only for WTI Crude Oil but other energy resources with a mid-term viewpoint. While there is abundant supply of Crude Oil worldwide, the current problems surrounding navigation and logistics are causing pandemonium in a consistent manner via WTI’s price as Middle East nations try to ship to their clients. This is causing many Asian nations to look elsewhere for their energy, Brazil has seen an increase in orders. And because of the upwards trend in fuel costs again, the Federal Reserve will have to look hard at inflation data and play a game of interest rate mania, which investors will have to calculate into their outlooks regarding debt ratios.

What does this have to do with Google and AI?

People like nations will search for the easiest and most cost efficient pathway to access their needs. Anthropic, OpenAI, Kimi K3, Microsoft Copilot, DeepBlue Technology, Meta, Sakana AI, IBM, Nvidia are only some of the companies involved in sourcing software and providing hardware to users. Many nations are involved in this AI chase and understand the importance of cybersecurity, data sharing and the problems surrounding the costs to power all of these machines.

Many of these companies above including Google are searching for a holy grail via energy supply and discussing the financing and building of energy infrastructure including nuclear capabilities. But as Google and other companies search for more energy to fuel their dependence on powering their systems for clients, they continue to be confronted by a growing wave which will eventually drown some of the companies in debt that they will not be able to recover from.

I am not forecasting an apocalypse, but I am suggesting not all of these companies which we think of as part of our everyday lives will survive this fight. Legacy companies eventually parish, just like many start ups. The realization that many companies are merely providing what the public is starting to see as necessity is a simple competitive evolution. BlackBerry, Nokia and Motorola are examples of giants falling.

It appears many investors are starting to ask hard questions about costs compared to future earnings in AI. The allure of the next big thing, which AI has been part of the past couple of years, is running into well-practiced investment cycle as froth erodes and financial institutions start to look at the accounting of the companies they are being asked to consider as long-term endeavors. Not all that glitters is gold will certainly start to create a patina on many of the so-called AI companies as they are forced to prove their worth as suppliers of a commodity.

The AI world has run into the time honored financial realization that many exotic tastes soon turn into another form of vanilla. The next big thing is always being anticipated and hoping to attract the deep pockets of investors. Certainly many of the big companies including Google are going to survive the current headwinds. but real profits could become harder to attain. Investors and speculators should not be surprised that reality has a tendency to reduce momentum.  Entropy is part of the investment world, investors and speculators always have to be ready for new disruptions and systems to emerge.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

SIngapore Dollar 20260717

Thoughts on the USD/SGD, Cautious Broad Market Sentiment and the Weekend

by with No Comment Artificial IntelligenceBehavioral SentimentEquitiesExclusive ContentFeatured HighlightsFinancial InstitutionsForexInvestingMajor Global Equity IndicesRisk ManagementRobert PetrucciSpeculatorsUncategorized

USD/SGD: Currently a Hope and Prayers Barometer in Global Forex

The USD/SGD is near the 1.29110 vicinity as of this writing. Financial institutions apparently have combined their cautious outlooks in the broad Forex market as USD centric strength continues to leak into sentiment, while their instincts technically demonstrate that over the mid-term currencies like the Singapore Dollar should be stronger and the USD/SGD is supposed to show some bearish activity.

For dramatic purposes let’s call this current phase of Forex trading including the USD/SGD as the hope and prayers act. The Singapore Dollar has sustained highs, but it has traversed lower over the past few weeks. On the 24th of June the USD/SGD was near the 1.29940 ratio. Let’s be clear, for small speculative Forex traders broad market wagering on USD direction remains dangerous.

SIngapore Dollar 20260717

USD/SGD Six Month Chart as of 17th July 2026

Fed Chairman Keven Warsh and His Desire to Introduce New Data

During the recent testimony of Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh in Washington D.C he made it clear he is keen on introducing AI tools into interpretations regarding Federal Reserve policy. However, he also said that AI will not be relied upon alone. From a coding perspective, Warsh essentially said proactive data will become part of the Fed’s thinking with proper supervision: some of you may want to call this a stack developer’s job.

At the same time while refusing to tip his cards regarding his stance on interest rates too much, Forex markets responded by selling the USD in incremental bouts. Intraday trading flared in its usual manner, but started show a core belief that Warsh is demonstrating dovish sentiment regarding interest rates.

USD/SGD as a Forex Barometer and Near-Term Behavioral Sentiment

The USD/SGD serves as a solid barometer of the Forex market. It offers perspectives on Asian sentiment, but also shows how global financial institutions are leaning. The escalation of firepower in the Middle East the past week and into today has caused reactions in the USD/SGD, but somewhat politely.

Having been able to trade below the 1.29000 mark on Tuesday and Thursday of this week, the currency pair is trading near values seen on the 8th of June and 18th. A lack of clarity remains a theme in Forex. The USD/SGD is the 10th biggest Forex pair via transactional averaged volume, so traders should give it attention even if they do not pursue.

Wall Street Remains Nervous and the Tense Weekend to Come

Going into this weekend Forex traders have created downside pressure on the EUR/USD and GBP/USD. The USD/JPY remains stubbornly above the 162.300 ratio. Nervous selling on the Nasdaq 100 via futures trading has been seen today and it looks as if Wall Street will be in for another bumpy ride. The wishful thinking drama in the financial markets is being confronted by the reality of a potentially loud weekend of military conflict between Iran and the U.S, and a seemingly unconvinced marketplace that doesn’t want to demonstrate risk appetite.

WTI Crude Oil prices via futures trading are above $80.00. Having been able to sustain values above the 1.29100 mark in the USD/SGD signals that bearish mid-term perspectives still need additional impetus to create more selling, but this doesn’t appear a wise speculative bet going into the weekend.

A cautious stance over the coming hours should be anticipated as folks wonder what the coming weekend will bring. At least there is the World Cup championship on Sunday (New York time) to take our minds off of concerns. However, Monday will not react to the trophy being raised, but to behavioral sentiment that will takes its cue via today’s finish on Wall Street and noise generated via the Strait of Hormuz this weekend.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

SP500 20260713

S&P 500: Short-Term Caution and Long-Term Ambitions

by with No Comment AMT MarketsAssetsBehavioral SentimentCorporateEquitiesFeatured HighlightsFederal Reserve, Interest RatesFinancial InstitutionsInvestingMajor Global Equity IndicesRisk ManagementSpeculatorsUncategorized

Speculative Opportunities Do Not Promise Immediate Profits as Cautious Outlooks Stir

The S&P went into this past weekend with slight gains made on Friday, but essentially finished where last week began. In early morning trading via the futures market the index has seen a slight decline. Retail short-term traders may decide that offers the potential to sit on the sidelines and watch what may be rather choppy conditions, this if they decide not to pursue.

Global markets including stock indices like the Nikkei and broad Forex have shown more discomfort early today. Short-term concerns and mid-term viewpoints are colliding and making momentum hard to sustain. The S&P 500 remains within its elevated realm, but there is a rather unpleasant taste many speculators have had to endure since the end of May, particularly if trading ambitions have been limited to near-term pursuits.

SP500 20260713

S&P 500 Futures Six Month Chart as of 13th July 2026

There will be a crowd of people at summer parties (or winter outings depending on which side of the equator you are on) discussing the gains made in the S&P 500 (and Nasdaq  100) since the end of March who will be quite keen to brag about their insights. However these same people have likely made their money via pension funds, mutual funds and other long-term endeavors guided by institutions managing their money. Because most short and near-term retail traders have likely been savaged by the results in the marketplace the past handful of months. 

Trading within the current markets conditions for those who have smaller accounts and are relying on leverage to create profits have likely been bled dry of their funds if they have not used proper risk management. It is one thing to want to make a thousand dollars a week in the markets as a retail trader and quite another to actually accomplish the task. 

Indices the past handful of months have been a churning machine in which volumes stir and create attractive chatter, but also deceive folks into believing they can win easily. The only folks winning consistently right now are brokers handling their clients’ retail accounts.

This doesn’t mean you have to stop and give up as a retail trader, but it should serve as a warning that not being overly ambitious and remaining patient are keys when trying to beat the markets. And again, let’s remember the average retail trader has about a 90% chance of failing when trying to speculate.

The S&P 500 did hit a record height in early June around the 7,620.00 vicinity. Its current values are well within sight of those highs too. Yet, headwinds continue to be seen via trading results intraday as financial institutions deal with wavering behavioral sentiment complicated by a myriad of concerns.

Yes, there will always be concerns in the marketplace, risk and reward are often compared to the potential of loss. If you are placing a bet in the markets that you believe can garner a thousand-fold profit, it is likely you are also risking a thousand-fold loss. And unfortunately the marketplace, nor your broker is going to lose sleep over your inability to understand what risks you are undertaking. You will hear that you have learned a tough lesson and the experience will help you become a better trader next time around by your broker, this as they offer you another opportunity to enter the markets on their platforms, but it still doesn’t guarantee you anything. 

The rumblings from the Middle East continues to mitigate sentiment in the global markets. As of this writing WTI Crude Oil is around $73.70. If military conflict between the U.S and Iran continues to incrementally escalate, perhaps experienced players will be able to handle the noise and worries regarding higher energy costs and threats of inflation. 

Equity indices are also running into problems caused by a realization that the costs of investing into companies working in the AI realm are now having to deal with rising costs, this as revenues do not meet expectations, and a lack of adequate physical resources to fuel growth in the sector are raised as concerns. And it is not a stretch to say the AI sector has helped drive more than a handful of equity indices higher. A legitimate fear regarding a downturn in AI related stocks and a possible knock-on effect is a sobering reminder that bullish trends do not last forever. 

And then there is the shadow that is overhangs the Federal Reserve and interest rate calisthenics being worked out by analysts who are trying to convince others (and themselves) that their outlooks are correct.

Yet, we return thankfully to a simple notion and question, one that has very little to do with economics that are taught in university classrooms – are there enough buyers in the marketplace to sustain the upwards trend in the S&P 500? The answer doesn’t have much to do with fundamentals, and often is driven by pure sentiment. Pushing aside day to day travails, wagering on long-term upside remains almost the only wager that can be made. Sure, you can bet on downside; you can short stocks, buy put options that look for lower markets. However, matching negative outlooks with the correct timeframe is just as hard as it is to bet on positive momentum. For the time being it is easy to say the near-term remains murky for day traders. It is harder to predict actual direction

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

WTI Crude Oil 20260701

What Am I Missing About USD Centric Strength?

by with No Comment Behavioral SentimentCentral BanksEconomyEquitiesFeatured HighlightsForexInvestingRisk AnalysisSpeculatorsUncategorized

Being Wrong About USD Direction and Betting Against the Trend

Help me out here folks, I am perplexed. I seem to be missing something about the USD centric strength, it looks very overbought to me. Where is all the buying sentiment coming from? The FOMC meeting outcome on the 17th of June has certainly sparked USD centric buying stamina as financial institutions seem to have fallen into a strict line and priced in a Federal Reserve interest rate hike this year.

However, the price of WTI Crude Oil was near $80.00 on the 17th of June. And on the 3rd of June the price of WTI Crude Oil was within sight of $100.00. Meaning that we have seen the price of energy trend lower. The agreement between the U.S and Iran, although fragile, has held and the current price of WTI Crude Oil is close to $69.70.

WTI Crude Oil 20260701

WTI Crude Oil One Month Chart as of 1st July 2026

While concerns about inflation certainly remain, costs should actually start to erode for logistics, fertilizers for agriculture, and manufacturing. Job numbers are solid, growth has been rather steady and shown signs of improvement. If inflation starts to behave and financial institutions change their thinking about interest rates to come, perhaps they will ease off on their borrowing costs.

Also, let’s note that as expected the new Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh has made it clear he will take a more proactive stance regarding interest rates. Evidence for this comes via Warsh’s decision not to participate in the dot forecast that FOMC members use, his absence from the Fed’s ‘prediction market’ game was notable, but many analysts seem to have missed the importance.

In my opinion, Warsh’s decision not to participate in the Fed’s dot plot quarterly signal chart shows the new Chairman wants to create the capability of changing his mind regarding the Federal Funds Rate as needed. The decision not to ‘anonymously’ show what his beliefs are looking forward will allow him to steer the Federal Reserve per forward looking economic data points instead of being held accountable – and possibly blamed – for changing his mind if a shift of opinion is needed.

So again, why is the USD so strong across the Forex board? The USD/JPY is trading well above 162.660+, the EUR/USD is near 1.13900, the GBP/USD around 1.13247 and the USD/SGD is sustaining value at mid-term highs close to 1.29660. While financial institutions appear to have priced in an interest rate, and may also be nervous about volatility in U.S equity indices, the cautious approach has created in my opinion an overbought USD.

As the Independence Day holiday approaches, Forex traders should be careful. If ever there was a time for the Bank of Japan to intervene and cause chaos it might be when USD Forex volume is minimal. Large USD traders may start vanishing in the coming days before the long holiday weekend, and the absence of U.S banks this coming Monday will also factor into the markets.

Selling the USD looks like a speculative bet certainly, particularly because its trend has proven rather strong the past few weeks. Let’s see what happens, but I suspect some downside pressure via USD centric price action is going to be generated.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

Nvidia 20260630

Nvidia Suffering From the AI Cold Bothering Investors and Speculators

by with No Comment AssetsBehavioral SentimentCommoditiesEconomyEquitiesExclusive ContentFeatured HighlightsInvestingRisk ManagementRobert PetrucciSpeculatorsUncategorized

AI: Exuberance and Threats of Fatigue

Has Nvidia now been oversold? While the Nasdaq 100 produces a casino like experience for day traders and large players, the velocity of value changes in the index should serve as a simple reminder that before stepping into traffic a speculator needs to acknowledge the road. A large collision is taking place before our eyes and it will generate more noise over the coming months. 

Nvidia is a solid indicator of behavioral sentiment being influenced by a mix of optimism and fears by speculators and investors competing, and trying to define terrain as turmoil swirls and a battle for profits rage. Day traders need to remember a lot of hyperbole is amplified to get eyeballs on opinions, hoping that your attention is grabbed. (Please buy me a cup of coffee has become a begging mantra).

Nvidia 20260630

Nvidia One Year Chart as of 30th June 2026

Nvidia finished yesterday’s trading near $195.00, this after touching highs in May around the $238.00 vicinity. The fact that NVDA has lost a large chunk of its value indicates sentiment is not entirely rational. There is a vast difference between speculative hopes compared to long-term investing. 

Results in the stock markets do show symptoms of overbought conditions prevail, but over indulgent fears are taking hold as folks try to interpret every move in a haphazard manner and make correlations which often have no evidence. Nvidia is a solid company which will continue to produce product lines that will be needed long-term. Talk of Nvidia suffering from an AI cold is relevant because it has certainly lost value, but the patient is going to survive.

Others however may not. AI companies and their proclamations about being able to deliver substantial change for users has become tiresome. Supply of software is widespread. While there is demand for use, competitors are abundant and growing daily. Users can now question just how reliable and strong the products they are using are, and if promises meet the results wanted. Costs users are paying for services will also become more critical. If products don’t meet needs, other AI systems can be easily installed nowadays. 

Oversupply is Saturating the Marketplace

Because AI tools are widespread it means users will demand services get cheaper. At some point it is clear that consumers will gravitate to competitive pricing, because at the end of the day there is only a certain amount of time to verify all the products in the marketplace and understand what works best. Branding as always is important, but so is quality. Loyalty in the AI world is only a couple of years old and cannot be counted on, some early companies are already seen as legacies and allegiances will shift. 

Competitors and new ideas continue to be brought forth quickly. A lot of product is being rushed to the market that lacks proper Q&A and actually does not deliver what is promised. Proof of concept is fluid with Artificial Intelligence, along with many claims of superiority. A company can get a product into consumers hands first, but at some point value has to be delivered too.

Investors are growing wary from too many claims. Yes, a revolution has taken place, but a counter-revolution is certainly coming. A lot of AI products are simply poor. Day traders have seen chaotic results on the Nasdaq 100 over the past year. 

President Trump, tariffs, the war in Iran, Federal Reserve and interest rate uncertainty, fear of inflation (all headlines from only the past few weeks) and other complexities can be blamed for volatility as folks wager on values on the Nasdaq 100. However, the prime mover of the index has not only been investing by long-term players, it has come from speculation chasing momentum via the Artificial Intelligence boom. However, a genuine concern that a fear of missing out is turning into fatigue exists.

AI because of its abundance is going to eliminate competing systems which are seen as cumbersome and expensive. Chinese companies appear ready to confront American enterprises with cheaper products that consumers may not mind paying less for even if this means consumers are sharing intellectual property and data with unknown entities. 

Sakana AI from Japan has announced and shown the past couple of weeks that it has software, Sakana Fugu, that is comparable in a favorable manner to Anthropic and Claude services. Sakana testers claim their system is robust and offers a multi-integrated modeling system, meaning a user doesn’t have to toggle in and out of models to deliver efficient information. The data via Sakana’s system is brought together via coordinated agent forces for the user. What will this do to valuation of Anthropic moving forward?

There is also a South Korean company called Furiosa, which is not public yet, that stands in the shadows and makes outstanding AI infrastructure. Furiosa appears ready to become an important player in chips and software innovation. Nvidia is certainly keeping their eyes on Furiosa. Meta offered Furiosa 800 million USD and was rejected in March 2025. 

Investors and speculators should not discount the potential of an AI tech dump from global competitors into the U.S and elsewhere developing over the next year. Mobile phones became a rather boring commodity after their initial entry astonished first time users two decades ago, AI will undergo the same pathway.

Some AI companies will certainly struggle over the next few years, but other enterprises will succeed merrily and profit. There is a big difference between investing and speculating. Even mid-term forays into the stock markets remain only gambles if a person plans on cashing out profits when they have hit a price target, instead of long-term ambitions to own shares in a quality company. 

Nasdaq100 bubble talk which has recently reignited in a loud manner should be given attention but astutely. It is hard to argue that the value of the indices like the Nasdaq 100 and S&P 500 are not in over-inflated territory. Looking at historical p/e ratios seems to have gone out of fashion. Warren Buffet cannot be thrilled and his fundamental strategies should not be ignored. Speculative hype needs to be confronted by investment reality. Folks will continue talking themselves into stances that are comfortable, even if they make little sense. The markets will certainly survive and so will AI.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

US Cash Index 20260617

Forex and the Fed Chair: Kevin Warsh in the Spotlight Later Today

by with No Comment AssetsBehavioral SentimentCentral BanksCommoditiesEconomyEquitiesExclusive ContentFeatured HighlightsForexInvestingMajor Global Equity IndicesRisk ManagementRobert PetrucciSpeculatorsUncategorized

New Federal Reserve Chairman will Cause a Reaction in Forex Today

I offer readers a ‘what if’ proposition ahead. These are my opinions and I am simply trying to give my perspective on what may happen in the Forex market in the coming hours.

The Fed Press Conference later today will be must watch television for Forex traders, including retail speculators, large players and financial institutions. Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh will make his first appearance after a FOMC rate decision. Dynamic conditions in the broad Forex market should be anticipated – that doesn’t tell day traders much I know, keep reading, please. 

U.S inflation has sparked higher this as energy prices have ignited upwards and caused logistics, manufacturing and agriculture to become more expensive. The Bank of Japan raised its interest rate by a quarter of a point yesterday to 1.00%. However, these two bits of evidence doesn’t mean the Federal Reserve will increase its interest rate today. 

The U.S Dollar Index is trading near relative highs. The broad FX market is certainly cautious, but financial institutions may be leaning into the notion of USD centric weakness. Yes, the USD/JPY remains above 160.000+ for the moment, but the USD/SGD is flirting with its lower range and came within sight of the 1.28000 mark on Monday. So why is this important? Because folks are acting cautious before a potential storm.

US Cash Index 20260617

U.S Dollar Index Six Month Chart as of 17th of June, 2026

Perhaps this will go down as an infamous egg on the face situation for me personally, but does Fed Chair Kevin Warsh really want to raise interest rates during his first FOMC meeting at the helm? Yes, Jerome Powell is still around as a voting Governor, but Warsh may find he has enough votes (and influence) to get a majority of other FOMC voting members to allow today’s decision to be a test case in favor of patience. 

If the Fed holds the Fed Funds Rate in place and announces it will use the near and mid-term as a trial period regarding their belief inflation will lessen, because it believes energy prices over the mid-term will erode rapidly, that may be enough to cause USD centric selling later today. The Fed will not use the word transitory I suspect, but an argument can certainly be made that now is the time to actually elucidate on the subject of transitory inflation.

Monday’s trading in the broad Forex markets showed that financial institutions bought into the optimism of an anticipated U.S and Iranian agreement and what it could deliver – a glut of Crude Oil, including lower costs for its ancillary products. Financial institutions were also relieved that U.S equity markets survived the launch of the SpaceX IPO certainly. While yesterday’s broad market trading turned cautious and demonstrated sideways action in Forex, many major currencies are traversing near curious values. Equities also went sideways for the most part on Tuesday.

The U.S Dollar Index is swimming within its higher terrain via a six month chart (per a look above), yet financial institutions – if they hear dovish sentiment from the new Fed Chair today could spring into action and sell the USD quickly. Day traders need to understand even if this occurs that it will still be ultra-dangerous to bet ahead of the Fed rate announcement and Press Conference. This because volatility leading up to and following the FOMC Federal Funds Rate decision will create large spreads in Forex and choppiness that small retail accounts cannot handle most of the time – particularly when too much leverage creates wildfires.

While the before and after of the Fed interest rate announcement will garner the headline news, and create a reaction on Wall Street for the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 immediately; it will be wise to pay attention to Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh a half hour later when he steps into the spotlight for the first time. There has been chatter that Warsh is not keen on trying to give too many signals regarding the Fed’s thinking regarding every move it is contemplating. 

This coincides with thoughts that Kevin Warsh and Scott Bessent believe in a more high-tech and pro-active approach to interest rate and monetary policy based on forward looking data. The consideration of a more dynamic approach to interest rates has not been widely considered by financial institutions quite yet. If the new Fed Chair surprises reporters and onlookers at the Press Conference today with a new philosophy on the way the Fed will work, this will set the stage for potentially large behavioral sentiment shifts that were not wagered on quite yet. In other words mid-term outlooks regarding U.S interest rate policy may change in a handful of hours more than many people think. 

Maybe I am wrong, maybe I am interpreting the political and financial landscape incorrectly, but these are my thoughts as a risk analyst – one who thinks the U.S White House would not mind seeing a weaker USD, a Fed that likely wants a different approach to interest rates – as they both hope for energy prices to lower (and may get their wishes fulfilled).

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share