Business Archives - Angry Meta Traders

Debunking Bitcoin Lies

July 30, 2026

by Charles Najjar with No Comment Assets Behavioral Sentiment Business Charles Najjar Commodities Cryptocurrencies Cryptocurrencies & Digital Assets Exclusive Content Featured Highlights Financial Institutions Investing Risk Management Speculators Uncategorized

The Paradox, Absurdity, Lies and Myths of Bitcoin

They say it’s an “asset”… but it has zero assets.

They say it’s decentralized… but the large majority of all transactions go through trading platforms.

They say it’s digital gold… but it has none of the physical attributes gold derives its value.

They say it’s immune to censorship… but countries like the US and China manage to be the largest holders without buying any Bitcoin.

They say it’s scarce… but there are 2.1 quadrillion Satoshi units that act exactly like a Bitcoin unit.

They say it’s a store of value… but it has witnessed several -50% to -80% drawdowns in its short history.

They say it derives its value from energy… but energy is a massive cost that someone has to pay!

BTC/USD Chart Since 2015 as of 30 July 2026

The Bitcoin protocol was introduced as a new monetary system: decentralized, censorship-resistant, scarce, transparent, secure, and independent of governments and financial intermediaries. It promised to eliminate the need for trusted third parties and replace institutional trust with a code.

However, more than fifteen years later, Bitcoin has failed on all those fake promises…

Today, the Bitcoin ecosystem is increasingly dependent on centralized exchanges, custodians, mining companies, stablecoin issuers, institutional investors, and financial intermediaries. The supposedly revolutionary monetary asset has become deeply intertwined with the very financial infrastructure it was designed to bypass.

And beneath everything lies an uncomfortable economic reality: the Bitcoin mining industry must continuously spend real resources (electricity, capital, land, labor, and massive equipment that becomes obsolete very quickly) to generate a virtual token that is distributed randomly… with the reward being halved by design every four years! What business model can survive such a flawed system where revenues are distributed randomly and halved every four years while costs increase constantly with adoption? It is the exact opposite of an economy of scale. The more successful your product is, the deeper your losses are! Even Fried Thiel, MARA’s CEO, ended up admitting that Bitcoin mining is a “zero sum game”! With miners doomed to fail economically, Bitcoin’s network security is destined to failure.

1. The Decentralization Paradox

The word “decentralized” is perhaps the most important word in the Bitcoin vocabulary.

In practice, it is far from being the case. Most Bitcoin transactions go through exchanges, custodians, brokers, or institutional funds (ETFs). Even miners store their mined bitcoins with custodians like Coinbase.

Today, the entire ecosystem relies on the solvency of companies like Coinbase, Binance, Tether, Strategy… all of which are in a critical financial situation. Should any of them collapse, the whole house of cards will fall down.

The irony is striking. Bitcoin was designed to eliminate the need for trusted intermediaries. Yet Bitcoin users increasingly trust intermediaries to hold their Bitcoins. Even miners do! How absurd is that?

2. The 21 Million Fake Limit

The most used argument for Bitcoin is that there will only ever be 21 million bitcoins.

But the statement requires closer examination too. A bitcoin is divisible into 100 million Satoshis. Each Satoshi has exactly the same “shape,” the same function, and the same attributes as a Bitcoin! Dividing something into exact copies of itself acts like a multiplier! That means the real supply is 2.1 quadrillion units (call them Satoshis or Bitcoins, it doesn’t matter).

The immediate response from Bitcoin supporters is that this is no different from saying that one dollar consists of 100 cents… but the dollar was never designed to have an absolute monetary cap.

The question then becomes whether the 21 million cap creates meaningful economic scarcity or simply a narrative of scarcity for marketing purposes. Anyway, the scarcity of something useless doesn’t make it useful…

The “21 million limit” becomes even more absurd when we consider the enormous number of other cryptocurrencies and tokens that exist. If scarcity itself is the central source of value, why should Bitcoin’s scarcity be uniquely valuable? The crypto ecosystem has demonstrated that creating a new digital asset is technically easy. Anyone can create a token with a fixed supply. If we create another digital token with a 10 million limit, much lower than Bitcoin’s 21 million limit, would it be worth more than Bitcoin because it would be considered scarcer? How can something be considered scarce if it can be replicated indefinitely with exactly the same “unique” attributes?

3. The “Digital Gold” Absurdity

They say Bitcoin is digital gold. Yet gold has physical properties that have made it valuable for thousands of years: durability, divisibility, portability, resistance to corrosion, and usefulness in jewelry and industry. Bitcoin has none of those unique physical attributes. Take away those physical attributes from gold, and it loses all its value. Since Bitcoin is gold without its physical attributes, it is therefore worth nothing! It’s as if we created a virtual token and called it “digital water,” pretending it’s “liquid” and “essential to life.” Still, if we can’t drink it or wash with it, what value would it have? Not only does Bitcoin have no intrinsic value, but it also requires continued investment in heavy infrastructure and massive electricity consumption to stay alive. It is like having a car parked in a garage, continuously consuming gas to remain “alive,” while you pretend it has value because it is unique! Once gold is mined, it costs nothing to continue existing. When Bitcoin is mined, the network needs to keep running on heavy electricity consumption for the Bitcoin to remain “alive.”

4. The “Censorship Proof” Lie

Governments around the world have acquired Bitcoin through seizures, confiscations, enforcement actions, bankruptcies, and other means. That’s how a digital coin created as a challenge to government monetary authority ended up in government-controlled wallets.

Governments do not need to control the blockchain to influence the market. They can shut down crypto platforms and seize their assets. What happened to the promise of monetary freedom?

5. The Myth of Low-Cost Bitcoin

Bitcoin is sometimes described as a cheap way to transfer money. The comparison can be attractive. There is no need for a traditional bank to approve a transaction. The network operates continuously.

But the cost of the system is not simply the transaction fee paid by the user. There is also the cost of maintaining the infrastructure. Bitcoin mining consumes enormous amounts of electricity and requires heavy equipment that becomes rapidly obsolete. The economic cost of maintaining the network is simply unsustainable. All listed miners show constant negative cash flow with massive dilution of shareholders and collapsing stock prices. It is not a coincidence. It is simply a sign that Bitcoin mining is economically unsustainable. It is a fundamentally losing business that is doomed to fail. When most miners inevitably capitulate, they will sell their Bitcoin reserves and provoke a massive collapse in the price. With less than 5% remaining to be mined over the next 100 years, there will be zero incentive for miners to start all over again. Bitcoin is doomed to fail from within.

If Bitcoin were truly revolutionary, all large technology companies, like Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Meta, would have jumped in to get their market share (as they did for AI)… instead we have empty shells with no business model, like Strategy, Nakamoto Inc, and Metaplanet, turning into “Bitcoin treasury” companies while incurring heavy losses and permanent negative cash flow.

Bitcoin was designed as an alternative to financial intermediaries. Now collapsing “treasury companies” and unsecured crypto platforms control the ecosystem. We shifted the risk from banks like JPMorgan, Citi, or Morgan Stanley, supported by the US central bank, to entities like Coinbase, Tether, and Binance… some of which aren’t even audited! And all without any support from a central authority.

The user may distrust banks, but he is asked to trust an exchange. The user may distrust central banks, but he is asked to trust a stablecoin issuer. The system has not eliminated trust. It has redistributed it to a much weaker ecosystem!

Bitcoin will be remembered as the greatest bubble of all time and the largest misallocation of capital and resources in human history.

The Not So Coincidental World of Google and WTI Crude Oil

July 24, 2026

by Robert Petrucci with No Comment Assets Behavioral Sentiment Business Commodities Economy Equities Exclusive Content Featured Highlights Federal Reserve, Interest Rates Financial Institutions Investing Major Global Equity Indices Risk Management Robert Petrucci Speculators Uncategorized World

Energy and Commodities in a World Where Legacy and Infrastructure Collide

Google (Alphabet) finished yesterday’s trading near $ 317.69, as of this moment WTI Crude Oil is around $88.50. It might seem rather odd to pair the two into the same paragraph, but this is not a coincidence. Both are now relevant regarding energy costs for consumers and produce an abundance of legacy products the world over. And oddly enough their one year charts almost look as if they are dancing in step.

Google is facing headwinds in recent trading as questions surround its capability to produce revenues because of its push into Artificial Intelligence and always growing need for more data center power. AI which has been an abundant source of bullishness in the Nasdaq 100 and had a knock-on effect into the S&P 500 the past couple of years has become shadowed by concerns of turning into a commodity.

Alphabet (Google) One Year Chart as of 24 July 2026

As competition in the AI sector increases this is creating pressure on prices in order to allure customers away from competing brands. China is also stepping into the world of Artificial Intelligence and it will certainly use its ability to produce less expensive products moving forward. Profit margins are being fought over by competing companies

Google is not a poor company, but there are growing doubts about its debt and revenue ratios. The costs to power its worldwide data ability for its users and its investment into AI via Gemini and its DeepMind technology does not have a particularly easy solution. Estimates from a variety of sources claim that Google has reduced its staff between 1,500 to 3,000 through employee reductions and reorganization, this as the company needs to pile more cash into infrastructure.

The onslaught of other companies able to produce AI which is seen as more robust and capable have also caused a marketing headache for Google, which has an effect on behavioral sentiment. GOOGL was trading at apex levels only two months ago when it was traversing above the $400.00 mark. The downturn thus far has been bad, but not catastrophic.

WTI Crude Oil One Year Chart as of 24 July 2026

While nervous sentiment can be blamed on the situation in the Middle East the past handful of months, the downturn which has occurred for Google and other important companies on the Nasdaq 100 involved or seen as having an ancillary association with AI needs to be considered a legitimate reaction because of worries surfacing regarding the ability to simply pay for all of the research and infrastructure.

In order to power AI it is becoming clear that energy costs are part of investing frameworks. Concerns about an AI bubble started to gather an audience last fall and the rumblings have grown louder, yet it can be said the ability of Google and many other companies to gain the past year in value still outweighs this current downturn experienced the past couple of months.

The Iranian war which is ongoing, appears to be entering a phase in which financial institutions are having to succumb to the notion of higher prices not only for WTI Crude Oil but other energy resources with a mid-term viewpoint. While there is abundant supply of Crude Oil worldwide, the current problems surrounding navigation and logistics are causing pandemonium in a consistent manner via WTI’s price as Middle East nations try to ship to their clients. This is causing many Asian nations to look elsewhere for their energy, Brazil has seen an increase in orders. And because of the upwards trend in fuel costs again, the Federal Reserve will have to look hard at inflation data and play a game of interest rate mania, which investors will have to calculate into their outlooks regarding debt ratios.

What does this have to do with Google and AI?

People like nations will search for the easiest and most cost efficient pathway to access their needs. Anthropic, OpenAI, Kimi K3, Microsoft Copilot, DeepBlue Technology, Meta, Sakana AI, IBM, Nvidia are only some of the companies involved in sourcing software and providing hardware to users. Many nations are involved in this AI chase and understand the importance of cybersecurity, data sharing and the problems surrounding the costs to power all of these machines.

Many of these companies above including Google are searching for a holy grail via energy supply and discussing the financing and building of energy infrastructure including nuclear capabilities. But as Google and other companies search for more energy to fuel their dependence on powering their systems for clients, they continue to be confronted by a growing wave which will eventually drown some of the companies in debt that they will not be able to recover from.

I am not forecasting an apocalypse, but I am suggesting not all of these companies which we think of as part of our everyday lives will survive this fight. Legacy companies eventually parish, just like many start ups. The realization that many companies are merely providing what the public is starting to see as necessity is a simple competitive evolution. BlackBerry, Nokia and Motorola are examples of giants falling.

It appears many investors are starting to ask hard questions about costs compared to future earnings in AI. The allure of the next big thing, which AI has been part of the past couple of years, is running into well-practiced investment cycle as froth erodes and financial institutions start to look at the accounting of the companies they are being asked to consider as long-term endeavors. Not all that glitters is gold will certainly start to create a patina on many of the so-called AI companies as they are forced to prove their worth as suppliers of a commodity.

The AI world has run into the time honored financial realization that many exotic tastes soon turn into another form of vanilla. The next big thing is always being anticipated and hoping to attract the deep pockets of investors. Certainly many of the big companies including Google are going to survive the current headwinds. but real profits could become harder to attain. Investors and speculators should not be surprised that reality has a tendency to reduce momentum. Entropy is part of the investment world, investors and speculators always have to be ready for new disruptions and systems to emerge.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

The Great Compression Part 3: The Immovable Object

July 11, 2026

by Yulia Vaiman with No Comment AMT Markets Artificial Intelligence Business Commodities Corporate Economy Equities Exclusive Content Featured Highlights Investing Risk Management Technology Yulia Viaman

The Landlord Beneath the Cloud

There is an old paradox: what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object? The AI buildout is the unstoppable force – the largest concentrated wave of capital spending in history. The immovable object is the physical world it is colliding with. Land, power, and water are the tangible bedrock that no balance sheet can conjure into existence. The paradox has a resolution the classical philosophers never thought of: the immovable object collects the rent.

Consider the scale of the force first. The four hyperscalers – Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, and Microsoft – plan to spend roughly $725 billion on capital expenditures in 2026, up nearly 80% from the year before. Add Oracle, the neoclouds, sovereign funds, and the rest of the AI heavy spenders – and total compute capex crosses $1 trillion in a single year, the first trillion-dollar year of its kind. Much of that money flows to the visible beneficiaries the market already knows by heart: NVIDIA for the GPUs, Micron for the memory, Dell for the servers, Cisco for the networking. Silicon, racks, interconnects.

The Great Compression Part 3: The Immovable Object

But every one of those chips has to be housed somewhere. It has to be powered. It has to be cooled. And this is where the unstoppable force runs into something it cannot simply outspend.

The constraint is no longer capital, and it is increasingly no longer silicon. It is the physical world. The bottleneck has shifted to power generation and grid interconnection, which take years to permit and build, and to the land and water that data centers consume at industrial scale. The richest corporations that have ever existed are discovering that a signed check does not produce a megawatt or a water right. The immovable object has begun to set the terms.

Nowhere is this clearer than in a deal signed on June 23^rd. Texas Pacific Land Corporation, aka TPL, agreed to provide the surface acreage and brackish water for Project Kilby, a large-scale power generation facility Chevron is building to supply a Microsoft data center cluster in Reeves County, Texas. When the announcement crossed the wires, Chevron’s name led every headline – and TPL was a footnote.

Meanwhile, the framing should be exactly backwards. Chevron, for all its scale, is the replaceable party in that transaction. Exxon, Occidental, or any of a dozen major energy companies could have built that power plant. What none of them could have supplied is the specific land and the specific water rights in that specific corner of the Permian Basin – because those belong to TPL, and there is no substitute for them at any price. The company that got the headlines is interchangeable. The company that got the footnote is the immovable object.

TPL is the purest expression of the scarcity trade beneath the AI buildout. It owns roughly a million acres of West Texas and produces almost nothing itself. It does not drill. It does not manufacture. It collects royalties, easements, and water fees from everyone who needs to operate on its ground. It is a toll booth on the physical world, and the AI buildout has just become one of its largest new customers. For years the market valued it as an oil-and-gas royalty play. It is quietly becoming an infrastructure landlord for compute – and almost nobody has ever heard of it.

The same logic radiates outward through the entire physical layer. Power is the genuine bottleneck, and the companies that generate it are being repriced accordingly. Constellation Energy, the largest operator of nuclear plants in the U.S., has become an unlikely AI stock as hyperscalers sign long-term deals for the one thing they cannot build fast enough: reliable, always-on baseload power. The grid that carries it has its own set of indispensable names – Quanta, which builds and maintains transmission infrastructure; GE Vernova, which supplies the turbines and grid equipment; Eaton, whose electrical systems distribute power inside the data center itself. And as chip density rises, the heat has to go somewhere, which has turned Vertiv, a maker of cooling and thermal management systems, into a core holding of the buildout.

What is striking is that this category does not merely sit still and collect. Some of its members are actively repositioning to attack. Ford, unable to win the electric-vehicle war against Tesla and nursing a $19.5 billion writedown on its EV investments, has taken the same physical assets – its plants, its battery capacity, a century of manufacturing expertise – and redirected them. In May it launched Ford Energy, a subsidiary building grid-scale battery storage systems, with data centers named explicitly as the demand driver. The immovable object, it turns out, can also choose its targets.

This is the HALO trade: Heavy Assets, Low Obsolescence. Companies whose value rests on tangible, physical assets and established operations that are expensive, time-consuming, or regulated – and therefore very hard to replicate. Land. Power. Grid. Water. Steel and concrete and copper. The unglamorous inputs that no model can commoditize because they cannot be reduced to software, and no amount of capital can summon into existence overnight.

None of this is permanently fixed, and it would be dishonest to pretend otherwise. Innovation erodes scarcity: small modular reactors, advanced geothermal, and better transmission technology will, in time, loosen some of the constraints that look absolute today. But two things blunt that threat. The first is Jevons paradox – when a resource becomes cheaper to use, consumption rises to swallow the savings, which means more efficient power generation is likely to expand the buildout, not shrink the edge of the providers. The second is that not all heavy assets are equal. The manufacturers and equipment makers face real competitive pressure over time. The owners of irreplaceable location – the specific acre, the specific water right – do not. You can build a better reactor, but you cannot build another Permian Basin.

The value that fled the human middlemen, that commoditized in the model layer, that migrated up the stack toward proprietary data and orchestration – also flows downward, and at the bottom it stops. It settles into the ground, into the wires, into the water table. But the ground is not neutral territory: land is permitted, power is regulated, water is allocated, and the fabs that print the silicon sit inside country borders. The unstoppable force keeps accelerating; the immovable object keeps collecting. And the moment we ask who owns the immovable object, the scarcity trade stops being a matter of markets and becomes a matter of sovereignty.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

India Insider: Foreign Investors and Their Selective Choices

July 8, 2026

by Ben Ezra with No Comment Assets Behavioral Sentiment Ben Ezra Business Commodities Economy Equities Exclusive Content Featured Highlights India Investing Major Global Equity Indices Uncategorized World

Return of Global Investors into the Indian Marketplace

Global investors are gradually returning to Indian assets after months of persistent outflows as risk appetite sentiment has been ignited by an extended ceasefire between the U.S and Iran. Energy prices have moved in India’s favor, sparking favorable conditions.

Despite recent flare ups in the Strait of Hormuz, Brent Crude has dropped about 30% in the past quarter, easing India’s fuel concerns as the world’s third largest Crude Oil buyer. AI trade rotation is gathering pace in Asia also, this as investors pull money from chipmakers that powered this year’s rally and hunt for cheaper ways to deploy their cash.

NIFTY 50 One Year Chart as of 8th of July 2026

Indian equities beat its emerging markets peers in June by its biggest margin in seven months. The Reserve Bank of India’s measures to attract foreign currency deposits and overseas capital have eased funding concerns for lenders, record foreign inflows into government bonds have helped stabilize the Rupee and improve liquidity conditions. According to Bloomberg, “Goldman Sachs favors 30-Year government bonds as lower oil prices allay inflation and fiscal risks”.

Combined with resilient credit growth and improving asset quality, India’s banking sector is once again attracting global investors, this after trading at meaningful discounts to historical valuations for quite a while.

Second Opportunity May Be Information Technology

Indian IT companies have undergone a sharp valuation correction over the past two years. Unlike the post pandemic period, when large Indian technology firms traded at substantial premiums to global peers such as Accenture. These premiums have now narrowed considerably after earnings growth slowed, and enthusiasm surrounding Artificial Intelligence shifted investor attention towards US technology companies.

As highlighted in Business Line magazine, the sector is undergoing a healthy valuation reset, with investors increasingly questioning whether premium valuations remain justified without a corresponding acceleration in earnings growth.

However, the discussion extends beyond valuations. Artificial Intelligence is fundamentally reshaping the enterprise software industry. For decades, Software as a Service (SaaS) companies dominated enterprise technology by offering standardized cloud based solutions that were cheaper and easier than developing software in-house. That advantage is now beginning to erode.

Large AI companies such as OpenAI and Anthropic are building AI agents capable of operating across multiple enterprise applications through a single conversational interface. Rather than competing within individual software categories, these horizontal AI platforms could reduce the importance of stand alone enterprise applications by seamlessly connecting them. At the same time, AI native startups are targeting specialized business functions, while advances in generative AI are encouraging enterprises to revisit the traditional ‘build versus buy’ decision as they develop customized software internally at significantly lower costs.

For Indian IT services companies, this represents both a disruption and a new opportunity. Routine application development and maintenance may become increasingly automated, placing pressure on traditional outsourcing revenues. Yet demand for AI integration, cloud migration, cybersecurity, enterprise transformation, and customised AI deployment is likely to create an entirely new investment cycle. The winners will be firms that evolve from conventional software service providers into strategic AI implementation partners.

Risks ahead for Indian Markets

The near term outlook is not without risks for India. A weak monsoon could push food inflation higher. Elevated Crude Oil prices may widen India’s external balances. And a stronger USD with elevated U.S interest rate yields could moderate foreign capital inflows. The technology sector also faces a structural challenge as Artificial Intelligence reshapes the traditional software business model, requiring companies to adapt more quickly than in previous technology cycles.

Even so, the broader macro backdrop appears to be improving. Policy measures have eased liquidity conditions, corporate balance sheets remain healthy, and valuations across several sectors have become considerably more attractive after an extended correction. Rather than chasing expensive momentum trades elsewhere in emerging markets, global investors may increasingly look toward Indian sectors where fundamentals are strengthening while expectations remain relatively subdued.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

Benefits of a Moderate Restoration While Threats of Growing Fissures are Heard

July 7, 2026

by Robert Petrucci with No Comment Assets Behavioral Sentiment Business Equities Featured Highlights Financial Institutions Investing Major Global Equity Indices Uncategorized World

Sentiment: Financial Institutions and November Outlook Amidst Possible Gridlock

The Nasdaq 100 is clearly being driven by behavioral sentiment at this time. Few investors are paying attention to corporate data, instead many financial institutions are wagering on mid-term outlooks driven by a combination of algorithmic led coding mixed with wishful thinking and hoping they are not washed out to sea by dangerous tidal pools they know are out of their control.

On the 3^rd of November 2026, the U.S mid-term elections will largely be held. President Trump’s hold on the House of Representatives looks as if it may come undone as a result of the coming vote if the Democrats take control as some polling suggests.

Perhaps that is exactly what investors are hoping for because historically when there is a divided Congress legislatively, stock market indices actually tend to gain. The reason for this is largely because a paralyzed Congress often finds it hard to pass measures which can hinder corporations and investors, because regulatory mandates are difficult to pass.

Nasdaq 100 Six Month Chart as of 7th of July 2026

If the Democrats win the House and President Trump is able to retain a Republican led Senate, this will lead to a deadlocked Congress which will make it hard to get work much done. Resulting in what may become one of the more memorable lame-duck Presidency’s of our time, one in which both sides of the U.S Congress openly disagrees with Trump’s ego driven rhetoric and instead turns to the backing of voters from their constituent state’s as a way to amplify their own policies.

While the Republicans appear potentially vulnerable in the November elections, the Democrats have problems of their own. An open fissure has been displayed as Socialists inspired candidates have won primaries in a handful of Democratic led Congressional districts and appear ready to splinter their political party regarding direction. What does any of this have to do with the economy and markets?

Perhaps this is exactly what crowds of investors in global markets, including Wall Street wants to happen at this point. Politicians forced to retreat to return their homes and become less vocal publicly may be a welcome remedy. Folks are starting to tire of political rabble, a crowded intersection of gridlock may be welcome at this point.

Unknowns: A Source of Concern for Investors

While it is certainly within the arsenal of the Trump Presidency to try and issue executive orders to try and get policies approved and acted upon. A split Congress, one in which Republicans can openly disagree with the White House without the fear of a political backlash may cause ruptures and positive outcomes for the GOP, if President Trump is weakened after the mid-term elections this November.

Democrats, particularly if they clash internally on their pronounced policies and have to spend more time trying to put out their own progressive internal fires may have to realign their thinking and walk more moderate lines. Activists on both sides of the political aisles may have to lessen their banter following election outcomes if they believe their voting public wants less noise.

A lame-duck President, could equate into a deadlocked Congress and debates simmering within each party which produce more moderate stances. However, if nothing is settled in November of this year this may lead to betrayals and revenge politically and potentially new leadership emerging which could be even more cynical, ignorant and insistent on false narratives.

Intriguingly, Wall Street will not be bothered by a deadlocked Congress and President who suddenly is limited by eroding power. In fact the conditions of withered post-revolutionary zeal and a slumber which could develop may allow corporations and investors to move freely about the ruptured political landscape with more liberty amidst the chaos. Investors will react to the sentiment that Washington D.C produces. A calm is wanted.

Within the ashes of Republican and Democratic turmoil a reconciliation may actually be able to take place. The question is if a restoration of moderate power will be finally be seen. Wall Street and most global investors would like a return of the centrists. No one is going to agree 100% of the time on policy, but a reality of transparent government without corruption would be a good start, one that many people actually would agree upon.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

The Great Compression Part 2: The Intelligence Trap

June 24, 2026

by Yulia Vaiman with No Comment AI & Machine Learning AI, Quantum & Metaverse Assets Behavioral Sentiment Business Equities Exclusive Content Featured Highlights Investing Technology & Science World Yulia Viaman

AI Aluminum

On June 17^th, the U.S. Air Force handed Anduril Industries a contract for its FQ-44 autonomous combat drone, making it the first new entrant to win a U.S. fighter aircraft program since the 1970s. The Silicon Valley startup beat Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Boeing – companies that between them have defined American air power for generations – to the target. Anduril, a defense technology firm founded in 2017, did not win on relationship or on legacy: it won on AI-native architecture.

The shift this represents is psychological as much as commercial. Defense procurement is arguably the most bureaucratic, relationship-driven, clearance-protected industry on earth. If AI-native vertical integration can break this barrier, anything is now open for re-negotiation.

The Great Compression Part Two: The Intelligence Trap

The compression of the human intermediary layer across the economy – the subject of this series’ opening piece – raises a question that is both philosophical and financial: if the old middlemen are disappearing, and if the AI models replacing them are themselves becoming commodities, where does value go?

What made the Air Force announcement structurally significant was a detail that went largely unnoticed: the service deliberately separated the drone hardware from its AI software, specifying that the intelligence layer could be upgraded or replaced independently of the platform. By doing so, the Air Force drew a line that the market is still catching up to – and then immediately complicated it. The aircraft is the delivery vehicle. The intelligence tier is what matters, except that intelligence is also commoditizing fast.

The commoditization signal had already arrived earlier this month, when Google cut the price of its AI plan by nearly 40% overnight. OpenAI is reportedly considering steep token-price cuts as competition with Anthropic intensifies. The models themselves are beginning to resemble a capital-intensive utility more than a premium software business. As intelligence becomes cheaper, the investment question shifts to what models cannot easily access: proprietary data, regulated workflows, institutional trust, and the systems that turn AI output into real-world action.

The answer, in the most durable cases, is proprietary domain data combined with deep sector integration. Anduril is not a defense company that adopted technology: it’s a technology company that chose defense as its vertical. Palmer Luckey, who sold Oculus to Meta when he was just 21, founded Anduril alongside veterans of Palantir with a specific thesis: Silicon Valley had abandoned defense, leaving a widening gap between what the military needed and what the traditional primes could deliver.

Where Lockheed and Boeing run bid-led organizations optimized for cost-plus contracting cycles measured in decades, Anduril built a product-first company that moves at software speed, focused on cheap, autonomous, attritable systems designed to be deployed and lost without catastrophic cost. The competitive edge that results has nothing to do with which model runs underneath it. It is purpose-built architecture, mission-specific design, and the kind of deep operational embedding that no generalist technology company can shortcut and no traditional prime can easily imitate.

Palantir built the same competitive edge a decade earlier, at the intelligence level. Their forward-deployed engineers embedded themselves inside classified environments, building proprietary data structures around defense and intelligence that competitors cannot access, let alone replicate. The model is almost beside the point. What matters is the institutional trust above it and the data structure underneath it.

The same logic plays out in banking, and the psyche shift there is equally striking. JPMorgan Chase is not an obvious candidate for AI leadership – a 150-year-old Wall Street institution steeped in regulatory obligation and institutional conservatism. Yet it has become arguably the most digitally aggressive major bank outside the fintech world, spending north of $17 billion annually on technology and deploying AI across trading, risk, legal document review, and client services. JPMorgan’s AI advantage over any fintech competitor is not compute – it is 150 years of proprietary transaction data, credit history, and market intelligence, combined with the institutional will to deploy it at scale. Many large banks sit on comparable reserves; few have built the machine to turn them into a competitive weapon. The model commoditizes; the data does not – but only in the hands of someone with the commitment to exploit it.

The pattern across defense, banking, and every sector where this is playing out is consistent: the prize migrates to whoever owns the scarce position that generic models cannot substitute for. Right now the prize sits with domain data and deep sector integration. What’s forming above it is agentic orchestration – systems that coordinate networks of specialized AI agents across high-stakes workflows: routing battlefield targeting decisions, flagging fraud across millions of simultaneous transactions, managing the exception-handling that no single model can resolve alone. Palantir’s AIP platform is the most mature example of this emerging tier, and it is no coincidence that the same company that mastered domain-specific data is now positioning for that orchestration tier. Salesforce’s Agentforce is building toward the same position from the enterprise side. The race for this trophy is not yet decided, but the companies that already own those domain data advantages are the natural favorites to own the control plane above them.

The stack, in other words, keeps moving upward. Value migrates to the next bottleneck, then the next. And below all of it – the models, the sectors, the orchestration layer – something has to hold the weight. Every control plane needs a floor. What that floor looks like, who owns it, and why it may be the most durable investment thesis of the AI era is the subject of the next piece.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

India Insider: Can We Become a Developed Economy on Low Wages?

June 15, 2026

by Ben Ezra with No Comment Business Economy Featured Highlights India Uncategorized World

The Brutal Nature of a Large and Cheap Workforce

Ms. Nithya (name changed) works in a private school in Tamil Nadu. She gets to school by 9 AM and leaves around 5 PM. The school she works for hasn’t paid a salary for two months and she has no contract. She gets $83.00 USD per month in a small city of Tamil Nadu State. While this may sound extraordinary to some readers, it is not an isolated case in countries like India.

Salary surveys and labour market studies indicate that many private school teachers in smaller towns and rural areas earn between ₹5,000 and ₹15,000 per month, this despite possessing educational qualifications and working full-time schedules. Though private schools in India often collect exorbitant fees, they pay teachers less and it hasn’t changed for years.

USD/INR Six Month Chart as of 15th June 2026

Indian nurses often are treated in the same manner. Those who prefer to work in government institutions or emigrate to foreign countries earn better wages. Attrition in the nursing industry is quite high in India. Why?

Because of the lower wages in most of the private hospitals in India, and the higher wages offered in Singapore or in the Middle East a career and lifestyle choice arises. That’s why many nurses work for a time in institutions closer to their towns. And then switch to more lucrative opportunities when salaries are more handsome in distant Indian cities or in a foreign country.

Male nurses from rural areas also leave and work in GCC countries. As long as wages remain lower and uncompetitive, attrition will prevail in India’s nursing sector.

Perspectives From The Employees Standpoint

India wants to become a 10 trillion USD economy by 2047. How will India increase its total output to achieve the above target? India has to create jobs and better compensation via salaries for its people.

Without sufficient income, how are people expected to pay for goods and services produced in the economy? And if people are not buying, who will buy the goods? Maybe the generous foreigners, but can India accomplish this goal? India’s service exports such as Information Technology are already facing questions of viability, this as AI confronts and makes strong and sufficient intrusions into existing business models of legacy companies.

Gig workers deliver parcels dictated by soulless algorithms. The algorithm doesn’t understand the burdens of hot summers and cold winters. It dictates rules and regulations according to its capital owners’ protocols. Employees who work in this profession have to work no matter whether they have fevers, cold ,body aches or anything else they might be an affliction.

Like feudal landlords who extracted labour without many concerns for the well being of those who worked under their authority, today’s digital platform economy often places efficiency and profits above human considerations. This is called “techno-feudalism” by some economists.

Though individual states in India have labour laws and regulations, India’s readiness and capability to enforce these laws in order to regulate the welfare of the labour market is still not up to standards elsewhere and difficult to enforce.

If your income remains low relative to the cost of living, how do you increase your consumption? A question that India’s ultra-wealthy should ask as their companies produce everything from cars to household goods and understand the importance of making money for themselves, is if they understand the other side of the balance sheet? Perhaps they would make investments that create jobs which in turn would help families spend their extra money on their companies goods and services.

India suffers from the availability of a high proportion of cheap and qualified labour that is easy to manipulate and allows a few to profit from the many. Given the tepid investments by private business in consideration for the other side of the balance sheet, the wages that most employees receive via basic economic models are insufficient.

Ironically and sadly, in some parts of India, especially in smaller towns or rural areas it is true that many private sector nurses, schoolteachers, and other service workers earn less than the international poverty line of $3 per day (around ₹285 at current exchange rates).

Education is certainly a tool for women empowerment, but it is often confronted by employers who take advantage of the educated and still pay poor salaries. This ‘accepted truth’ regarding education becomes questionable given the reluctance of institutions to pay a better salary for those who have spent money on improving their knowledge and skills. Those who work for meager pay, while not earning enough income to save money, nor participate in liquid investments or stock investments are caught in India’s labour market trap.

While writing this article, I witnessed a young married woman in her 30s, delivering parcels on behalf of Flipkart (owned by Walmart) in a vehicle which suffered from the brutality of the afternoon sun. Such is the nature of the labour market right now in India .

India shouldn’t allow people to work in a system that enriches techno-feudalists and business people by putting the welfare of their employees at risk. If India wants to be a developed economy, it should put people first. Economic development should not be measured solely by GDP growth, stock market indices, or the wealth of billionaires. It should also be judged by whether the ordinary workers can earn enough to live with dignity, support their families, and participate meaningfully in the prosperity they are helping create.

Note: 1 USD = 94.90 INR as of 12^th June 2026

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

Nasdaq 100: Terrible Friday Being Confronted by Manic Monday

June 8, 2026

by Robert Petrucci with No Comment AMT Markets Assets Behavioral Sentiment Business Equities Featured Highlights Federal Reserve, Interest Rates Financial Institutions Forex Major Global Equity Indices Risk Management Speculators Uncategorized World

Fear of the Middle East Not the Main Motivator for the Nasdaq 100

After Friday’s selling surge and a fall of -4.77% with a close of 28,957.60, the Nasdaq 100 futures trading this morning has actually seen an increase and is near the 29,479.00 mark as of this writing before the cash Nasdaq 100 market opens.

Friday’s selling nightmare for traders who found themselves stubbornly locked into what were to be short-term buying positions and saw the Nasdaq 100 plummet -4.77%, probably woke this morning believing ugly conditions may not stop. An escalation in military action via proclaimed retaliatory moves between Israel and Iran started today’s trading with a high degree of more anxiousness. USD centric strength in Forex was demonstrated early.

Nasdaq 100 Futures Value 1 Month Chart as of the 8th of June 2026

However, in the past couple of hours calmer heads have prevailed among financial institutions and USD centric buying in the broad Forex market has run out of steam – at least momentarily. For instance the USD/JPY is near 159.927 currently, opposed to earlier highs seen this morning which challenged the 160.400 vicinity. What does this have to do with the Nasdaq 100 and its current status?

It appears via futures trading that large players may also have taken a sedative and looked at the index as having been oversold on Friday. The Nasdaq 100 has actually gained early today and signs that a de-escalation of military force between Israel and Iran is being reported. However, that still leaves day traders wondering what will happen as the cash market opens soon and volumes increase.

Let’s Say Quiet Prevails the Remainder of the Day

Not because of a utopian outlook, but a geopolitical perspective, let’s try to image Iran’s stated intentions of no more retaliatory strikes being launched towards Israel as true. The past couple of hours have been more tranquil as a signal in case you are wondering. Then investors and financial institutions will have to digest the Middle East concerns as they have done over the past couple of months in U.S equities, and decide to operate again on the Nasdaq 100 with near and mid-term outlooks.

Friday’s huge selling was blamed by some on the likelihood of a ‘potential’ U.S Federal Reserve interest rate taking place on the 17^th of June. This because better than expected jobs numbers showed to some that the U.S economy was running hot once again.

Additionally expressed fears, which are legitimate, about higher energy costs sparking sticky inflation have been discussed and worried about aloud. Yet, again let’s decide to say even if U.S inflation numbers via the Consumer Price Index come in higher than expected this Wednesday via the coming CPI data, that doesn’t shut the door on the possibility the new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh won’t fight against an interest rate hike during the FOMC meeting next week. In other words it still seems rather unlikely – to me – that the new Federal Reserve Chairman is going to want to initiate higher interest rates the first month on the job. So what if there was another reason for the steep selling on the Nasdaq 100?

Not Paradise but Purgatory

The Nasdaq 100 actually has other questions which have been raised as possible fodder for its large selling this past Friday. Was it spawned because of profit taking by those who took advantage of the index’s fabulous rise knowing that many institutions had been front running the IPO of SpaceX which is scheduled to happen on the 12^th of June – this Friday?

Did large players who rode the wave of frontrunning by financial institutions up in the Nasdaq 100 since late March, decide to cash in profits. There is plenty of nervousness surrounding what will take place with SpaceX in the coming months and long-term via outlooks because of its rather inflated valuation which looks like it will be around 1.7+ Trillion plus at share values of $135.00 per share this coming Friday.

Questions surrounding SpaceX’s price per sales rhetoric, this instead of price per earnings (because SpaceX is not making a net profit) is just one example. While denying Elon Musk’s genius and ability to create clamor for his companies has proven to be a losing proposition for many, doubters still remain.

Folks might have cashed out winnings on Friday and decided to now wait on the sidelines to see where behavioral sentiment takes the Nasdaq 100. After two full months of paradise for the Nasdaq 100, a few days of purgatory and seeing which direction U.S indices go may be the right decision by folks who rely on clarity; this as the Middle East gets untangled (or becomes more complicated), the Federal Reserve offers insights on the 17^th of June, and large financial institutions lead the way regarding investment decisions.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

India Insider: Growth without Prosperity, Thoughts and Comparisons

May 28, 2026

by Ben Ezra with No Comment Ben Ezra Business Central Banks Commodities Corporate Data Exclusive Content Featured Highlights India Investing Uncategorized World

Growth and Prosperity Data Meet India and China's Realities

Economic growth is important for generating prosperity. India as well as China has helped millions be lifted out of poverty using separate development trajectories. Still, questions about income distribution remain a difficult topic that policy makers in both nations often are unwilling to look at with deeper persistence because plenty of inequalities still exists and the subject remains potentially divisive.

China’s low income population is extremely large. Professor Li Shi’s research argues that nearly 300 million people in China are earning less than 1000 Yuan ($149 USD) per month in 2021, while nearly 98 million had monthly incomes below 500 Yuan ($75 USD).

The same is true for the majority in India. As per the Pahle Foundation research shows nearly 91% of India’s workforce remains in the informal sector where their annual per capita incomes are below ₹2.5 lakh Rupees or ₹20,800 Rupees per month ($217 USD per month).

Although industrial and wage models are different comparatively, for instance in China the industrial sector includes 32% of the total working age population and produces an estimate of 36 to 37% of the GDP. And 22% of China’s workforce are employed in agriculture and produce close to 7% of GDP. In India a higher share of the people are in agriculture – close to 45%, and generate roughly 15-18% of the nation’s GDP.

However, there are still problems in both countries regarding inequality via wage disparities of citizens. When income growth is stagnated or not growing, fixed assets capital formation is difficult. People save less and invest less, which in turn makes the economic consumption story difficult. This is happening in China and in India.

Regarding growth, Professor Li listed a series of mounting pressures: China’s growth rate has fallen from its high-speed era of 8 to 10% to around 5%. Household income growth has slowed sharply and the weakest gains are among the poorest groups. Urban wage growth has also softened. Consumption remains structurally weak. Fixed-asset investment, especially private investment has lost momentum. Unemployment, particularly among young people remains elevated. These are not separate problems. Taken together they raise a harder question, whether China can still generate the level of growth needed to meet its 2035 and 2050 prosperity targets?

India between 2015–2016 experienced significant growth driven by consumption, investment and services expansion. After Covid-19 its growth has stabilized around 6 to 7%, yet higher levels of prosperity are not clearly visible for many and inequality has widened.

The unemployment rate among those aged 16 to 24 in China has remained around 16% for an extended period, fluctuating during seasonal reasons. Unemployment among other age groups have also risen gradually, indicating clear pressure in the labor markets.

In India the unemployment for youth aged between 16 to 25 of age is 42%, per a Azim Premji University Surveys and State of Working India report in 2023. This unemployment rate is double the ratio of what we are witnessing in China.

While in China the education departments have shifted towards STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Medicine). India still focuses on Social Science curriculums and students who study within these fields often cannot find job opportunities in the labor market.

India for many years hasn’t invested a substantial amount of energy and commitment to build a vibrant manufacturing sector. Yet, studies have shown that every job created by manufacturing exports creates two additional jobs in related sectors like transportation and logistics.

China’s wealth inequality via income has risen sharply, Professor Li Shi estimates the wealth Gini coefficient above 0.7 in 2023. India’s wealth inequality may be even more concentrated. Various estimates place India’s wealth inequality/income distribution per the Gini coefficient above 0.80, indicating an extremely unequal distribution of assets and accumulated capital.

However, the structures of inequality differ between the two economies. In China inequality emerged alongside rapid industrialization, urbanization and export, and led to manufacturing growth. A large industrial economy generated substantial wealth – but distributed it unevenly between labor and capital.

In India inequality is shaped not only by a wealth concentration at the top, but also by the persistence of low productivity via employment, informal labor markets, weak wage growth, and limited human capital investment across large sections of the population. Thus, while China faces the challenge of emphasizing prosperity within a middle income industrial economy, India continues to struggle with the deeper structural problem of trying to create broad based household income growth in the first place. The differential also sheds light on industrial sector based employment and those in agricultural jobs comparatively between the two nations regarding wage context.

Hard questions that China should ask include if their employment force – who are without many social protections and suffer a lack of higher wages, will allow China to attain competitive advantage over the rest of the world? While its manufacturing products are in demand, it doesn’t help the average Chinese person see realized wages go up and nor creates a dignified life. And China’s trading partners do not benefit, because a lack of competitive advantage destroys industries and makes unemployment problems even worse in other nations. It’s not a question about advantage only, it’s also about why this surplus and deficit competitive problem is growing rapidly and makes stable prosperity unachievable over the long term.

In India despite being proclaimed as the fastest growing global economy, if the young population don’t get jobs and cannot create income for their families, then what’s the purpose of this high GDP growth? Yes, the nation gets to show good growth numbers while hoping to achieve additional investment, but problematic results still occur.

Economic growth without wage growth leads to widening inequality, social unrest and sometimes political backlash. For growth to be inclusive, wages need to rise along with GDP. This requires not just distribution, but a transformation like raising the average productivity of every worker and ensuring they receive their fair share of the economic pie.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

The Great Compression Part 1: The End of the Middlemen

May 25, 2026

by Yulia Vaiman with No Comment Assets Business Corporate Equities Exclusive Content Featured Highlights Investing Major Global Equity Indices Risk Management Technology Uncategorized Yulia Viaman

Elevator Boys of GenAI

In the 1920s, every office building had an elevator boy. Although automated elevators already existed, people found the idea of riding in a driverless box dangling by steel cables terrifying, and delegated the role to a uniformed human they trusted, accepting the necessity to pay for the privilege. Over the years, people got used to elevator buttons, but the force of habit and the preference for human touch kept the profession flourishing for years.

The operators were so confident in their indispensability that they went one step too far: in 1945, a New York strike brought the city to a grinding halt, costing it hundreds of millions of dollars. That was the final straw, leading to a massive push to upgrade to automated systems. Within a short while, the job ceased to exist, entering the history books as the only major job category to be completely wiped out from the U.S. Census purely due to automation. The only one so far, that is.

Elevator boys were the cleanest definition of a middleman: someone who exists not because they create value, but because of information asymmetry or transaction friction. The history of modern commerce is largely a history of those “toll booth” trades, and of the technologies that remove them one by one.

Newspapers were once the only viable printed information channel, using their middleman position to bundle content with ads and classifieds, fattening their revenues. People accepted it because nothing else existed – but then the Internet broke their business model. Craigslist alone did more damage to newspaper economics than any editorial failure ever could; Twitter and Facebook finished the job. Today the newspaper is a diminished thing, sustained largely by institutional inertia and nostalgia.

Real estate agents had an informational moat – access to listings, knowledge of comparable sales, relationships with buyers – which was valuable in a world without Zillow. Once that information became freely available, their commission became very hard to justify. The agent survived by clinging to the execution layer, but that too is shrinking.

Here is where the story gets interesting. The companies that dismantled the old middlemen wasted no time building new ones. Uber eliminated the taxi dispatcher and the phone-in booking system, then inserted itself between driver and passenger for a fat slice of every fare. DoorDash did the same between restaurant and customer. Expedia aggregated what travel agents used to know and charged airlines and hotels for access to their own customers. These were genuine technological improvements, but the business model was identical to what they replaced: find a friction point, own it, and extract rent from both sides. The market rewarded them handsomely for this, for a while. Then the next wave arrived.

Generative AI is driving a change of extraordinary scale and speed. We cannot assess the impact of the tsunami from inside it, but we can see the fish floating belly-up, and extrapolate. The agentic economy is eliminating many roles that just a couple of years ago seemed staple of our service-based economy. AI agents will (if they haven’t yet) replace secretaries, clerks of all kinds, brokers, advisors, recruiters, customer service representatives, paralegals – and the buck won’t stop there.

What is happening now to companies like Capgemini, Accenture, and McKinsey is structurally identical to what happened to newspaper classified departments and taxi dispatchers. AI agents do not merely reduce friction – they eliminate the information asymmetry that made the intermediary necessary in the first place. A system embedded inside an enterprise does not need a consultant to explain what it is doing. It does it, iterates, and reports back.

OpenAI and Anthropic understood this early, which is why both recently announced joint ventures – in a parade lockstep – to deploy engineers directly inside corporate clients. OpenAI has built an elite, highly technical consulting wing – a multi-billion dollar venture backed by TPG, Brookfield, Bain Capital and others. Anthropic teamed up with alternative asset titans like Blackstone, Hellman & Friedman, and Goldman Sachs to form a dedicated AI services company. AI labs are moving fast into services and deployment because model commoditization is a risk, and because adoption bottlenecks hurt revenue growth.

The Big Four are seemingly fine for now, touting alliances with the AI leaders, helping them scale AI implementation across their enterprise clients. However, professional consultants are clearly the next elevator boys, hanging by the thread of the “human in the loop” habit. The only chunk of the consulting business that is accelerating involves embedding the AI revolution into enterprises – and very soon, Anthropic and OpenAI will not require the help of PwC or Deloitte for that. They are the owners of the technology: why would they pay a toll for a booth on their own road?

The irony is pointed: the companies building the technology that makes middlemen obsolete are inserting themselves as the new middlemen between the AI model and the enterprise. But even this layer is temporary. Once AI agents can deploy themselves, even that layer compresses. The OpenAI and Anthropic JV story is the last gasp of the middleman era.

The real and durable beneficiaries of the AI economy are not the model builders. Raw intelligence, reasoning, and pattern-matching are no longer rare, expensive breakthroughs – they are becoming cheap, standardized, and universally accessible. Core AI technology is turning into a commodity, just like electricity once did – and the value moves both up and down the stack.

“Up the stack” is a constantly moving target. Right now, it sits in hyper-specific vertical applications – defense, aerospace, finance, and medicine – where proprietary data, regulatory compliance, and domain expertise create durable moats. It also lives in the integration layer: the software plumbing that turns raw AI reasoning into auditable, legally compliant enterprise actions.

In the near term, value will shift further to agentic orchestration – the “Agent Overlords” that coordinate swarms of specialized AI agents, manage workflows, handle exceptions, and maintain oversight across complex business processes. These control planes will become the new scarce and valuable layer, much as operating systems and databases once did. What comes after that is harder to predict, but the pattern is clear: as each layer commoditizes, the economic prize moves to the next bottleneck.

“Down the stack” is the physical layer underpinning everything, and that’s where the true moat is. Every agentic transaction, every automated workflow, every AI-mediated business relationship runs on cloud compute, which runs on power, which runs on tangible assets unlikely to be replaceable for at least the next decade. After a century of disruption, humanity has come full circle: the “boring” material world – acres, bricks, pipes, wires, water, and power – has once again become the real source of scarcity and enduring value.

OpenAI and Anthropic are the last of the middlemen: brilliant, richly capitalized, yet ultimately dependent on infrastructure they do not own. What sits beneath them is not a new intermediary – it is bedrock.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

AMT Top Ten Miscellaneous Insights on the 18th of May, 2026

May 18, 2026

by Staff with No Comment AMT Top Ten Assets Behavioral Sentiment Business Commodities Equities Featured Highlights Forex Investing Risk Management Uncategorized World

Valuations and Drinking, Bad Storms and Politics Amidst the Resilient Nature of People

10. Resilience: The Western Cape of South Africa endured strong storm conditions last week. One of the hardest hit areas was the Cape Winelands District, but electricity and water have been widely restored. And a collective of people have proven working together can produce solid results when needed.

9. Spencer Who: The Los Angeles mayor race is growing intriguing. A reality star turned social influencer threatens to become an influenza for his opponents. This as Spencer Pratt’s campaign gets noticed for its entertaining social media videos. This has caused many folks to ask what has happened to the state of politics and meaningful policy. But if NYC can elect a socialist, why can’t L.A elect an influencer and make some people feel sick?

AMT Top 10 Miscellaneous Insights for the 18th of May, 2026

8. Two Trillion: SpaceX early investors have agreed to allow a five for one stock split, meaning the company (and Elon Musk) are now aiming for a potential doubling of its worth when its IPO is initiated – on Nasdaq – in the second week of June. Some very serious accountants will be kept busy trying to show how SpaceX will produce enough revenue over the next twenty years in order to make a 2 trillion USD valuation palpable to future investors.

7. Drunk: Brown-Forman Corporation will begin its trading near $26.28 on the NYSE today. The company is the majority owner of Jack Daniels and other alcohol related enterprises. The value of Brown-Forman Inc. in June of 2021 was around 80.00 per share. The sobering phase of the public – particularly among young drinkers – to avoid bars and clubs, and instead stay on their mobile phones has hurt share values in many alcohol related companies. There are also concerns that too many drink companies now exists. Before Brown-Forman becomes the life of the party again, it appears some competition will have to go dry.

6. Deals: Prime Minister Modi visited Abu Dhabi a few days ago, and one of the results was an agreement to purchase and store energy reserves on a large scale in the United Arab Emirates. Modi also confirmed India’s strong connection to the UAE politically. While always trying to maintain a non-aligned stature, India appears to be moving closer to an increasingly important alliance with the UAE – which has also aligned with Israel strategically. The potential of these three nations acting together will ruffle feathers in a few noteworthy Middle Eastern and Asian countries.

5. Populists: President Trump’s tendency to say outlandish things and then suddenly turn around and show a willingness to negotiate terms has always been part of his art of the deal composite. However, saying what people want to hear and then turning on a dime and not delivering is also a symptom of populism. Trump isn’t the only politician suffering from this flaw. What do politicians really think, and how differently would they act if a they didn’t need votes for themselves or backers to remain in power?

4. Wall Street: After attaining apex highs early last week, the three major indices have taken a step backwards. Near-term concerns are effecting outlook as financial institutions balance risk averse tactics to long-term belief that sunnier days will prevail. While the Dow 30 didn’t set a record last week, the ability of the index to climb above 50,000 was noticeable. Equity markets appear tentative as this week begins and folks seemingly wait for more thunder and its potential effects.

3. Emirates: The UAE was attacked by drones yet again yesterday, this time at the Barakah nuclear facility. The hit has been downplayed, but highlights that military conflict with Iran remains very possible across the region. It is doubtful conversations are being conducted with polite undertones behind closed doors. The U.S, Israel and other nations are watching Iran – and Iran is watching them. The price of WTI Crude Oil remains a key barometer regarding the markets and concerns about the war igniting in full once more. Prices of oil remain sustained above $101.00 per barrel in the futures markets. The UAE might not want to be a focal point, but it isn’t backing down either.

2. Hawkish: The U.S Federal Reserve may have to actually consider raising interest rates before they can realistically discuss the notion of cutting borrowing costs, particularly if energy prices remain elevated and spark a sustained inflation threat over the mid-term. The USD started to show renewed strength the past few trading sessions in Forex, this as financial institutions compare their near-term anxiousness to growing concerns about mid-term ramifications regarding higher fuel costs.

1. Ego vs. Hubris: The U.S and China summit held largely in Beijing this past Thursday and Friday matched competing politicians and ideologies. In one corner U.S President Trump spoke with a rather inflated sense of himself while he detailed policy objectives and his perspectives. In the other corner Xi Jinping, the President of China, might have displayed some hubris as he warned the U.S about the Thucydides Trap. Xi expressed his belief that China is the emerging super power and that the U.S is a declining nation. However, China’s economy is known to be suffering because of a myriad of complex reasons, and could face more headwinds if energy prices and supplies remain hard-pressed.

Copy and paste the text from AMT that you want to share

India Insider: Rupee Under Pressure as Oil Prices Surge and Import Bills Rise

May 15, 2026

by Ben Ezra with No Comment Assets Ben Ezra Business Central Banks Commodities Exclusive Content Featured Highlights Financial Institutions Forex India Investing Speculators World

Iranian War and Implications for India as Energy Prices Cause Vulnerability

India is currently facing mounting external economic pressures as rising global crude oil prices weaken the Rupee, widen the current account deficit, and increase the risk of imported inflation. As one of the world’s largest energy importing nations, India remains highly vulnerable to fluctuations in global oil markets. The recent surge in energy prices, combined with geopolitical tensions and volatility in currency markets, has intensified concerns among policymakers, economists and investors.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has stepped up its intervention in the foreign exchange market to stabilize the Rupee, while the government is evaluating measures to reduce pressure on import billing. Rising fuel prices, weakening currency conditions and growing external imbalances have combined to create a challenging macroeconomic environment that may test India’s economic resilience in the coming years.

USD/INR Six Month Chart as of 15th March 2026

Gold and consumer electronics imports are increasingly being viewed as non-essential imports, and policymakers may consider restricting these categories in order to reduce stress on the current account deficit. Officials are concerned that a widening trade imbalance could place further downward pressure on the Rupee and increase dependence on foreign capital inflows.

The Rupee on Thursday fell to a record low near ₹95.95 per USD, making it one of Asia’s weakest performing currencies this year. The currency has erased most of the gains achieved following earlier RBI intervention measures aimed at curbing speculation in the Forex market. Analysts expect the Rupee to remain under pressure through 2026, especially if global crude oil prices continue to rise and significantly increase India’s import billings.

The impact of rising crude oil prices is becoming increasingly visible across the Indian economy. Private fuel retailers have either reduced diesel sales or raised prices in response to the rally in global oil markets, leaving state owned refiners to absorb a larger share of domestic demand. Long queues at fuel stations and rising transportation costs have intensified concerns over inflationary pressures.

Earlier today, State-owned fuel retailers raised fuel prices for the first time in nearly four years as New Delhi adjusted domestic pricing to reflect higher international crude prices following escalating tensions in Western Asia. Diesel and gasoline prices increased by more than 3%, even though Brent crude prices had risen by nearly 50% over the same period.

In New Delhi, diesel prices climbed to around ₹90.67 per litre, while gasoline prices rose to approximately ₹97.77 per litre. These are among the highest levels recorded since 2022 and reflect the growing burden of imported energy costs on the Indian economy.

Economists argue that the rise in fuel prices signals a gradual shift toward market based pricing rather than extensive government controls. Policymakers increasingly recognize that artificially suppressing fuel prices could worsen fiscal pressures and create larger external imbalances over time.

Currency Weakness and Monetary Policy Challenges

RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra recently remarked at an event in Switzerland that continued currency weakness may be “only a matter of time” if global energy prices remain elevated and capital flows become increasingly volatile.

Foreign outflows during the year have already exceeded previous levels, while a sustained rise in crude oil prices above $100 per barrel could significantly widen the trade deficit and push India towards another period of pressure on balance of payments.

In this climate, attracting foreign capital via various tax cuts or raising the interest rates is paramount to reduce the pressure on the currency. It’s already been seen that New Delhi is working on reducing taxes for foreigners investing in Indian bonds.

Rise of Inflationary Pressures

Although India’s headline inflation remains relatively contained and below the RBI’s 4% medium term target, imported inflation risks are steadily increasing.

Economists also believe the RBI may eventually be forced to maintain tighter monetary conditions or raise interest rates further if energy prices continue to accelerate.

The central bank has already raised interest rates to around 5.25% this year, but several economists argue that further tightening may still become necessary.

Historical Perspective and Structural Risks

Economic historians often compare the current situation with the oil shocks of the 1970s. During that period, the United States was heavily dependent on imported oil. The oil crises of 1973 and again in 1979 contributed to inflationary pressures, balance of payments stress, and periods of USD weakness.

However, economists note that today’s global environment is significantly different. The United States has become one of the world’s largest oil and gas producers, reducing its dependence on imported energy. As a result, rising oil prices no longer weaken the U.S Dollar in the same way they did during earlier oil shocks.

For countries like India, the impact remains severe. India imports the majority of its crude oil requirements. Higher global oil prices directly increase India’s import billing and create additional demands for USD.

As Economist Philip Verleger was quoted by Bloomberg, “when you are a major oil importing nation, you are not only paying more for crude itself, you are also paying more for the dollars required to purchase it.” India is now facing this realization again.